IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13180-d941004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth and Associated Factors in Northern West Bank, Palestine

Author

Listed:
  • Ibtesam Medhat Mohamad Dwekat

    (Department of Community Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
    Faculty of Health Professions, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 51000, Palestine)

  • Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail

    (Department of Community Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Ismail Ibrahim

    (Department of Community Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia)

  • Farid Ghrayeb

    (Faculty of Health Professions, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 51000, Palestine)

  • Eatimad Abbas

    (Faculty of Health Professions, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 51000, Palestine)

Abstract

Mistreatment of women during childbirth is a clear breach of women’s rights during childbirth. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of mistreatment of women during childbirth in the north of West Bank, Palestine. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 269 women within the first 16 weeks of their last vaginal childbirth to understand the childbirth events by using proportionate stratified random sampling. An Arabic valid questionnaire was used as a study instrument. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the factors associated with each type of mistreatment. The mean age of the women was 26.5 (SD 4.77) years. The overall prevalence of mistreatment was 97.8%. There were six types of mistreatment. Nine factors were significantly associated with the occurrence of one or more types of mistreatment. Delivery at a public childbirth facility was associated with all of the six types (aAdjOR: 2.17–16.77; p -values < 0.001–0.013). Women who lived in villages (aAdjOR 2.33; p -value = 0.047), had low education (aAdjOR 5.09; p -value = 0.004), underwent induction of labour (aAdjOR 3.03; p -value = 0.001), had a long duration of labour (aAdjOR 1.10; p -value = 0.011), did not receive pain killers (aAdjOR: 2.18–3.63; p -values = 0.010–0.020), or had an episiotomy or tear (aAdjOR 5.98; p -value < 0.001) were more likely to experience one or more types of mistreatment. With every one-hour increase in the duration of labor, women were 1.099 times more likely to experience a failure to meet the professional standard of care. Women were less likely to experience mistreatment with increasing age. Women with increasing age (aAdjOR: 0.91–0.92; p -values = 0.003–0.014) and parity (aAdjOR 0.72; p -value = 0.010) were less likely to experience mistreatment. Awareness of women’s fundamental rights during childbirth, making the childbirth process as normal as possible, and improving the childbirth facilities’ conditions, policies, practices and working environment may decrease mistreatment occurrence.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibtesam Medhat Mohamad Dwekat & Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Farid Ghrayeb & Eatimad Abbas, 2022. "Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth and Associated Factors in Northern West Bank, Palestine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13180-:d:941004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meghan A Bohren & Joshua P Vogel & Erin C Hunter & Olha Lutsiv & Suprita K Makh & João Paulo Souza & Carolina Aguiar & Fernando Saraiva Coneglian & Alex Luíz Araújo Diniz & Özge Tunçalp & Dena Javadi , 2015. "The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Giacaman, Rita & Wick, Laura & Abdul-Rahim, Hanan & Wick, Livia, 2005. "The politics of childbirth in the context of conflict: policies or de facto practices?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 129-139, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D. Sheferaw & Tegbar Yigzaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2020. "Risk Factors for Positive Appraisal of Mistreatment during Childbirth among Ethiopian Midwifery Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Desirée Mena-Tudela & Susana Iglesias-Casás & Víctor Manuel González-Chordá & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón & Laura Andreu-Pejó & Águeda Cervera-Gasch, 2021. "Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part III): Healthcare Professionals, Times, and Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Narayani Paudel Ghimire & Sunil Kumar Joshi & Pranab Dahal & Katarina Swahnberg, 2021. "Women’s Experience of Disrespect and Abuse during Institutional Delivery in Biratnagar, Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Abdul-Rahim, Hanan F. & Abu-Rmeileh, Niveen Mohammad Elias & Wick, Laura, 2009. "Cesarean section deliveries in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt): An analysis of the 2006 Palestinian Family Health Survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(2-3), pages 151-156, December.
    5. Katarina Swahnberg & Anke Zbikowski & Kumudu Wijewardene & Agneta Josephson & Prembarsha Khadka & Dinesh Jeyakumaran & Udari Mambulage & Jennifer J. Infanti, 2019. "Can Forum Play Contribute to Counteracting Abuse in Health Care? A Pilot Intervention Study in Sri Lanka," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D Sheferaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Tegbar Yigzaw & Marlou L A de Kroon, 2020. "Development and use of a scale to assess gender differences in appraisal of mistreatment during childbirth among Ethiopian midwifery students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Elizabeth Zitha & Mathilda M. Mokgatle, 2020. "Women’s Views of and Responses to Maternity Services Rendered during Labor and Childbirth in Maternity Units in a Semi-Rural District in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Emanuelle Pessa Valente & Ilaria Mariani & Benedetta Covi & Marzia Lazzerini, 2022. "Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Janet Lok Chun Lee & Temmy Lee Ting Lo & Rainbow Tin Hung Ho, 2018. "Understanding Outdoor Gyms in Public Open Spaces: A Systematic Review and Integrative Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Georgia Michlig & Nicole Warren & Merry Berhe & Crista Johnson-Agbakwu, 2021. "Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among Somali Women in the U.S. State of Arizona: Evidence of Treatment Access, Health Service Use and Care Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Dinusha Perera & Muzrif Munas & Katarina Swahnberg & Kumudu Wijewardene & Jennifer J. Infanti & on behalf of the ADVANCE Study Group, 2022. "Obstetric Violence Is Prevalent in Routine Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Study of Obstetric Violence and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Sri Lanka’s Colombo District," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Derek Asuman & Ama Pokuaa Fenny & Doreen Nyarko Anyamesem Odame, 2021. "Trends and antecedents of inequalities in maternal healthcare coverage in four African countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 515-544, April.
    13. Varley, Emma, 2010. "Targeted doctors, missing patients: Obstetric health services and sectarian conflict in Northern Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 61-70, January.
    14. Malambo, Nomthandazo, 2021. "“Not from home”: Cancer screening avoidance and the safety of distance in Eswatini," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Bradley, Susan & McCourt, Christine & Rayment, Juliet & Parmar, Divya, 2016. "Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of women's perceptions and experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 157-170.
    16. Catarina Barata, 2022. "“Mix of Races, Bad Uterus”: Obstetric Violence in the Experiences of Afro-Brazilian Migrants in Portugal," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Smit, Anri & Coetzee, Bronwynè Jo’sean & Roomaney, Rizwana & Bradshaw, Melissa & Swartz, Leslie, 2019. "Women's stories of living with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 231-245.
    18. Lange, Isabelle L. & Kanhonou, Lydie & Goufodji, Sourou & Ronsmans, Carine & Filippi, Véronique, 2016. "The costs of ‘free’: Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin's caesarean section exemption policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 53-62.
    19. Dua’ Yousef Al-Maharma & Reema Rafik Safadi & Roberta Durham & Suhaila Naim Halasa & Omayyah Saeed Nassar, 2021. "Mothers’ and Midwives’ and Nurses’ Perception of Caring Behaviors During Childbirth: A Comparative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    20. Firew Tekle Bobo & Habtamu Kebebe Kasaye & Belachew Etana & Mirkuzie Woldie & Tesfaye Regassa Feyissa, 2019. "Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Western Ethiopia: Should women continue to tolerate?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13180-:d:941004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.