IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12061-d923456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal Experiences with Discussing Complementary Feeding in Primary Care

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Lynn Bouchard

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Diana S. Grigsby-Toussaint

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA)

  • Katelyn Fox

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Sarah Amin

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Maya Vadiveloo

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Mary L. Greaney

    (Department of Health Studies, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Alison Tovar

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA)

Abstract

Complementary feeding practices promote healthy eating habits and food preferences later in life. Little is known about how US pediatricians communicate infant feeding practices to caregivers or how caregivers respond to this information. The purpose of this study is to explore mothers’ experiences and perceptions of the complementary feeding recommendations they receive in primary care settings. English- and Spanish-speaking mothers of infants were recruited from Special Supplemental Nutrition for Women, Infants, and Children offices in Rhode Island, US, and snowball sampling. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted to investigate mothers’ discussions with pediatricians about complementary feeding and their overall impressions of wellness visits. Thematic analysis was informed by the Fundamentals of Care theoretical framework. The mean age of the sample ( n = 13) was 30.5 years and 62% self-identified as Latina. Four themes emerged from the analysis: (1) wellness visits are mostly positive experiences, (2) not all infant feeding recommendations are easy to follow, (3) alternative sources of infant feeding recommendations can be just as helpful, and (4) there is room for improvement at wellness visits. Improving the content, delivery, and cultural relevance of infant feeding recommendations in primary care settings with more specific and tailored information may promote adherence to evidence-based practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Lynn Bouchard & Diana S. Grigsby-Toussaint & Katelyn Fox & Sarah Amin & Maya Vadiveloo & Mary L. Greaney & Alison Tovar, 2022. "Maternal Experiences with Discussing Complementary Feeding in Primary Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12061-:d:923456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Begley & Kyla Ringrose & Roslyn Giglia & Jane Scott, 2019. "Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    3. Sophie Nicklaus, 2016. "Complementary Feeding Strategies to Facilitate Acceptance of Fruits and Vegetables: A Narrative Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.
    4. Enza D’Auria & Barbara Borsani & Erica Pendezza & Alessandra Bosetti & Laura Paradiso & Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti & Elvira Verduci, 2020. "Complementary Feeding: Pitfalls for Health Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trish Dearlove & Andrea Begley & Jane Anne Scott & Gemma Devenish-Coleman, 2021. "Digital Marketing of Commercial Complementary Foods in Australia: An Analysis of Brand Messaging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Gülüm Özer & İdil Işık & Jordi Escartín, 2024. "Is There Somebody Looking out for Me? A Qualitative Analysis of Bullying Experiences of Individuals Diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Júlio Belo Fernandes & Diana Vareta & Sónia Fernandes & Ana Silva Almeida & Dina Peças & Noélia Ferreira & Liliana Roldão, 2022. "Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Daniel Muir & Cristiana Orlando & Becci Newton, 2024. "Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or ‘at risk’ young people: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    6. Yu, Jiazhou & Dong, Dong & Sumerlin, Timothy S. & Kim, Jean H., 2023. "Feasibility of introducing effective alcohol harms reduction strategies in a low regulation region: A qualitative study from Hong Kong," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Hall, Julie & Hawkins, Olivia & Montgomery, Amy & Singh, Saniya & Mullan, Judy & Degeling, Chris, 2022. "Dismantling antibiotic infrastructures in residential aged care: The invisible work of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    8. Hossam Mohamed Elhamy & Maha Abdulmajeed, 2023. "Arab Media Researchers’ Perceptions of Factors Affecting Their Research Problem Selection," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    9. Wesley Darling & Jacquelyn Broader & Adam Cohen & Susan Shaheen, 2023. "Going My Way? Understanding Curb Management and Incentive Policies to Increase Pooling Service Use and Public Transit Linkages in the San Francisco Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Michal Beňo, 2023. "Re-Establishing Home and Work Boundaries by Pseudo-Commuting Whilst Working from Home," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 123-134.
    11. Izudi, Jonathan & Cattamanchi, Adithya & Castelnuovo, Barbara & King, Rachel, 2024. "Barriers and facilitators to viral load suppression among people living with HIV following intensive adherence counseling in Kampala, Uganda: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    12. Dario Krpan & Jonathan E. Booth & Andreea Damien, 2023. "The positive–negative–competence (PNC) model of psychological responses to representations of robots," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1933-1954, November.
    13. Elena Commodari & Valentina Lucia La Rosa & Giuseppina Susanna Nania, 2022. "Pregnancy, Motherhood and Partner Support in Visually Impaired Women: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Elizabeth L. Adams & Amanda Edgar & Peyton Mosher & Bridget Armstrong & Sarah Burkart & R. Glenn Weaver & Michael W. Beets & E. Rebekah Siceloff & Ronald J. Prinz, 2023. "Barriers to Optimal Child Sleep among Families with Low Income: A Mixed-Methods Study to Inform Intervention Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Tafel Maximilian & Szolnoki Gergely & Jedicke Eckhard, 2023. "Do German winegrowers see a connection between biodiversity and wine tourism?," Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 321-333, October.
    16. Enza D’Auria & Barbara Borsani & Erica Pendezza & Alessandra Bosetti & Laura Paradiso & Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti & Elvira Verduci, 2020. "Complementary Feeding: Pitfalls for Health Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Pojani, Dorina, 2024. "The effect of fuel price fluctuations on utilitarian cycling rates: A survey of cyclists in Vietnam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Silvia Novelli & Francesca Moino & Patrizia Borsotto, 2022. "External Benefits of Irrigation in Mountain Areas: Stakeholder Perceptions and Water Policy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Michelle Klerks & Sergio Roman & Maria Jose Bernal & Juan Francisco Haro-Vicente & Luis Manuel Sanchez-Siles, 2021. "Complementary Feeding Practices and Parental Pressure to Eat among Spanish Infants and Toddlers: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Abdul‐Rahim Mohammed, 2024. "The hidden costs of austerity for social programmes in the Global South: Qualitative insights from two complementary services in Ghana's Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Programme," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 1965-1981, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12061-:d:923456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.