IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11386-d911491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indoor Mobility, Frailty, and Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Riccardo Brustio

    (NeuroMuscularFunction, Research Group, School of Exercise & Sport Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
    Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy
    Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anna Mulasso

    (NeuroMuscularFunction, Research Group, School of Exercise & Sport Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
    Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Samuel D’Emanuele

    (Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy)

  • Gianluca Zia

    (Bluecompanion Ltd., London NW8 9DD, UK)

  • Luca Feletti

    (Caretek s.r.l., 10127 Torino, Italy)

  • Susanna Del Signore

    (Bluecompanion Ltd., London NW8 9DD, UK)

  • Alberto Rainoldi

    (NeuroMuscularFunction, Research Group, School of Exercise & Sport Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
    Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

The general population, but especially older adults, were forced or encouraged to stay home during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, indoor mobility (IM, the number of steps performed daily at home) may be informative about the general health status of older adults. The present study aimed at evaluating the relationship between IM, frailty (loss of functional reserve including both physical and psychosocial domains), and disability (loss of autonomy measured as activities of daily life, ADLs) in a sample of community-dwelling Italian older adults. Specifically, the primary objective was to investigate IM and disability differences between robust and frail older adults. The secondary objective was to test if frailty is in the causal sequence between IM and disability, i.e., as a mediator in their relationship. Thirty-two participants (mean age = 70 ± 6 years; 56.2% women) were recruited. Frailty and disability were evaluated using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale, respectively. IM at home was measured via an Adamo wristwatch (a connected accelerometer). One-way analyses of covariance, controlling for age and gender, showed that robust participants, classified according to a score higher than five points in the Tilburg Frailty Indicator, performed significantly more IM (F 1,28 = 4.639; p = 0.04) and presented lower disability grade than frail ones (F 1,28 = 4.342; p =0.046). Only physical frailty was a mediator in the relationship between IM and disability (F 2,29 = 8.538, p < 0.001), with a fully mediated model (z = −2.073, p < 0.04). Conversely, the total frailty score was not a mediator in the same relationship, but with IM accounted for the variance in disability (F 2,29 = 8.538, p < 0.001; R 2 = 33.7%). Our results suggested that frail older adults restricted their IM more and presented a higher level of disability compared to robust older adults. Moreover, data suggest that IM reduction may have a negative impact on physical frailty and indirectly increase disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Riccardo Brustio & Anna Mulasso & Samuel D’Emanuele & Gianluca Zia & Luca Feletti & Susanna Del Signore & Alberto Rainoldi, 2022. "Indoor Mobility, Frailty, and Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11386-:d:911491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kempen, G. I. J. M. & Miedema, I. & Ormel, J. & Molenaar, W., 1996. "The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(11), pages 1601-1610, December.
    2. Wolfgang Lutz & Warren Sanderson & Sergei Scherbov, 2008. "The coming acceleration of global population ageing," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7179), pages 716-719, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Yun-Sook Jung & Taejun Park & Eun-Kyong Kim & Seong-Hwa Jeong & Young-Eun Lee & Min-Jeong Cho & Keun-Bae Song & Youn-Hee Choi, 2022. "Influence of Chewing Ability on Elderly Adults’ Cognitive Functioning: The Mediating Effects of the Ability to Perform Daily Life Activities and Nutritional Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Pilar García-Gómez & Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Judit Vall Castelló, 2014. "Financial Incentives, Health, and Retirement in Spain," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Disability Insurance Programs and Retirement, pages 455-495, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Hugo Benítez-Silva & Eva Cárceles-Poveda & Selçuk Eren, 2011. "Effects of Legal and Unauthorized Immigration on the U.S. Social Security System," Working Papers wp250, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    5. Yixuan Liu & Liumeng Li & Guomei Miao & Xinyan Yang & Yinghui Wu & Yanling Xu & Yonghong Gao & Yongzhi Zhan & Yiwei Zhong & Shujuan Yang, 2021. "Relationship between Children’s Intergenerational Emotional Support and Subjective Well-Being among Middle-Aged and Elderly People in China: The Mediation Role of the Sense of Social Fairness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Mihajlo (Michael) Jakovljevic & Laura Romeu-Gordo & Mira Vukovic & Maja Krstic, 2017. "Gender-Specific Health-Seeking Behavior and Income Status among the Elderly Citizens of Serbia," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 3(1), pages 67-86.
    7. Lingzhi Li & Jingfeng Yuan & Kathy O. Roper & Zhipeng Zhou, 2017. "A Multi-Stakeholder Delphi Study to Determine Key Space Management Components for Elderly Facilities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Feifei Bu & Alasdair Rutherford, 2019. "Dementia, home care and institutionalisation from hospitals in older people," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 283-291, September.
    9. Felipe Vásquez & Gibran Vita & Daniel B. Müller, 2018. "Food Security for an Aging and Heavier Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Andreas Irmen, 2021. "Automation, growth, and factor shares in the era of population aging," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 415-453, December.
    11. Hugo Benítez-Silva & Richard Disney & Sergi Jiménez-Martín, 2010. "Disability, capacity for work and the business cycle: an international perspective [Has the boom in incapacity benefit claimant numbers passed its peak?]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 25(63), pages 483-536.
    12. Katarzyna Maj-Waśniowska & Tomasz Jedynak, 2020. "The Issues and Challenges of Local Government Units in the Era of Population Ageing," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Hugo Benítez-Silva & J. Ignacio García-Pérez & Sergi Jiménez-Martín, 2011. "The effects of employment uncertainty and wealth shocks on the labor supply and claiming behavior of older American workers," Economics Working Papers 1275, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    14. Raisa Țăruș & Ștefan Dezsi & Florin Pop, 2021. "Ageing Urban Population Prognostic between 2020 and 2050 in Transylvania Region (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Jing Luo & Guangping Chen & Chang Li & Bingyan Xia & Xuan Sun & Siyun Chen, 2018. "Use of an E2SFCA Method to Measure and Analyse Spatial Accessibility to Medical Services for Elderly People in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Warren C. Sanderson, 2010. "Comment on "Adjusting Government Policies for Age Inflation"," NBER Chapters, in: Demography and the Economy, pages 162-168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Andrew J. Wiltshire & Gillian Kay & Jemma L. Gornall & Richard A. Betts, 2013. "The Impact of Climate, CO 2 and Population on Regional Food and Water Resources in the 2050s," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Satish Chand & Michael Clemens & Helen Dempster, 2022. "Wage arbitrage through skilled emigration: Evidence from the Pacific Islands," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 430-446, September.
    19. Yang Yu & Yijin Wu & Xin Xu & Yun Chen & Xiaobo Tian & Li Wang & Siyun Chen, 2021. "Spatial Disparities and Correlated Variables of Community Care Facility Accessibility in Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Xiaer Xiahou & Yuchun Tang & Jingfeng Yuan & Tengyuan Chang & Ping Liu & Qiming Li, 2018. "Evaluating Social Performance of Construction Projects: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11386-:d:911491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.