IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11363-d911352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Factors Influencing Public Satisfaction with Community Services for COVID-19: Evidence from a Highly Educated Community in Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Qihui Xie

    (Department of Public Administration, School of Law and Humanities, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xun Xie

    (Department of Public Administration, School of Law and Humanities, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Siwei Guo

    (Department of Public Administration, School of Law and Humanities, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The satisfaction of highly educated citizens with community services for COVID-19 represents the attitude of the middle class and plays an important role in both the social and political stability of a country. The aim of this paper was to determine which factors influence public satisfaction with COVID-19 services in a highly educated community. Through a literature review and using the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) model, this paper constructed a public satisfaction model of community services for COVID-19 and proposed relevant research hypotheses. A community with many highly educated residents in Beijing was selected as the case study, where 450 official questionnaires were distributed based on the age ratio of residents, with 372 valid questionnaires being collected from May 2021 to July 2021. The study results obtained by a structural equation model (SEM) show that: (1) public satisfaction is significantly and positively influenced by quality perception (0.305 **), public demand (0.295 **), and service maturity (0.465 ***); (2) public satisfaction has a significantly positive effect on service image (0.346 ***) and public trust (0.232 **), and service image significantly affects public trust (0.140 *); (3) service maturity is positively influenced by public demand (0.460 ***) and quality perception (0.323 *); and (4) public demand is positively influenced by quality perception (0.693 ***) (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.00). The conclusions of the study can provide suggestions and recommendations to improve the satisfaction of highly educated residents with community healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Qihui Xie & Xun Xie & Siwei Guo, 2022. "The Factors Influencing Public Satisfaction with Community Services for COVID-19: Evidence from a Highly Educated Community in Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11363-:d:911352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Noda, 2019. "Citizen expectations and satisfaction of service performance: lessons from subnational governments in Japan," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 142-156, July.
    2. Oliver James & Carolyn Petersen, 2018. "International rankings of government performance and source credibility for citizens: experiments about e-government rankings in the UK and the Netherlands," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 469-484, April.
    3. Thang V. Nguyen & Canh Q. Le & Bich T. Tran & Scott E. Bryant, 2015. "Citizen Participation in City Governance: Experiences From Vietnam," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(1), pages 34-45, February.
    4. S. Venus Jin & Ehri Ryu, 2022. "“The greedy I that gives”—The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations ," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 414-448, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Wang & Lingling Yue, 2024. "Optimizing Business-to-Business Customer Satisfaction Analysis through Advanced Two-Stage Clustering: Insights from Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lily - Trinh Hoang Hong Hue, 2019. "Gender Differences of Citizen Participation in Local Government: The Case of Vietnam," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 225-238, December.
    2. Elizabeth A. Minton, 2022. "Pandemics and consumers' mental well‐being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 5-14, March.
    3. Manh-Toan Ho & Ngoc-Thang B. Le & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "A bibliometric review on development economics research in Vietnam from 2008 to 2020," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 2939-2969, October.
    4. Carlitz, Ruth D. & Povitkina, Marina, 2021. "Local interest group activity and environmental degradation in authoritarian regimes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Yasutoshi Moteki, 2023. "Customer Satisfaction with Branch Office Services in Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima Prefecture," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 805-823, June.
    6. Ciesielska, Magdalena & Rizun, Nina & Chabik, Jakub, 2022. "Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: A framework and case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    7. , Aisdl, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," OSF Preprints 9nbyr, Center for Open Science.
    8. Lakshmi P. Rajendran & Christopher T. Boyko & Claire J. Coulton & James D. Hale & Rachel F. D. Cooper, 2020. "A Socio-Spatial Approach to Enable Inclusive Well-Being in Cities: A Case Study of Birmingham, UK," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Indra Maslukah & Martaleni & Umi Muawanah, 2023. "The Influence of Work Discipline and Ease of Administrativeness on Community Satisfaction Through Service Quality," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 1661-1670, July.
    10. Rui Nan & Yongjiao Yang, 2022. "Who Is Willing to Participate in Local Governance? Modernization of Shared Governance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Alba Mohedano Roldán, 2017. "Political Regime and Learning Outcomes of Stakeholder Participation: Cross-National Study of 81 Biosphere Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    12. A. H. M. Kamrul Ahsan & Peter Walters & Md. Adil Khan, 2021. "Service Delivery and Accountability of Urban Officials: Evidence from Urban-based Local Government in Bangladesh," South Asian Survey, , vol. 28(2), pages 222-242, September.
    13. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2020. "The rise of research on development economics in Vietnam: Analyses and implications for the public and policymakers from SSHPA 2008-2020 dataset," Thesis Commons msy6e, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11363-:d:911352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.