IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9796-d883847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenia Țigan

    (Faculty of Food Engineering, Tourism and Environmental Protection, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 2-4 Elena Drăgoi Str., 310330 Arad, Romania)

  • Radu Lucian Blaga

    (Faculty of Economics, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 77 Revoluției Bdl., 310032 Arad, Romania)

  • Florin-Lucian Isac

    (Faculty of Economics, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 77 Revoluției Bdl., 310032 Arad, Romania)

  • Monica Lungu

    (Faculty of Food Engineering, Tourism and Environmental Protection, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 2-4 Elena Drăgoi Str., 310330 Arad, Romania)

  • Ioana Anda Milin

    (Faculty of Management and Rural Tourism, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Calea Aradului Street No. 119, 300645 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Florin Tripa

    (Faculty of Economics, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 77 Revoluției Bdl., 310032 Arad, Romania)

  • Simona Gavrilaș

    (Faculty of Food Engineering, Tourism and Environmental Protection, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 2-4 Elena Drăgoi Str., 310330 Arad, Romania)

Abstract

The research was conducted in a particular context, the recent pandemic. It is a comparative study of the methods and quality of communication in global companies between 2021 and 2022. The corporations involved in the research are important providers of flexible production, quality, and logistics solutions that cover customers’ real needs. They are active in the automotive industry and units involved in mass production in the electronics industry, household appliances, and cosmetics industries. In their case, it was noted that to achieve operational objectives such as developing employee skills, using advanced technologies, and exceeding customer expectations, it is important to use innovative methods and tools such as single platforms, which allow access to the most important information from a distance, anywhere, anytime. It is significant that, according to the research, the preferred method of communication by employees, regardless of the existing conditions, is face-to-face. Primarily, this method is chosen because it provides an open area of interpersonal interaction. The participants observe non-verbal attitudes or can perceive emotions and feelings. Their personality can be identified through unintentional contact to obtain constructive feedback through guidance and counseling. Moreover, it can be formed and develop productive, intentional connections. Stakeholders’ efficient and effective open dialogs are encouraged in this sense.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenia Țigan & Radu Lucian Blaga & Florin-Lucian Isac & Monica Lungu & Ioana Anda Milin & Florin Tripa & Simona Gavrilaș, 2022. "Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9796-:d:883847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongrok Choi & Yanni Yu, 2014. "The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Maja Rožman & Polona Tominc & Borut Milfelner, 2020. "A Comparative Study Using Two SEM Techniques on Different Samples Sizes for Determining Factors of Older Employee’s Motivation and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Ha, Kyoo-Man, 2019. "Integrating the resources of Korean disaster management research via the Johari window," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Mark Brown, 2013. "A Methodology for Mapping Meanings in Text-Based Sustainability Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Sofie Bjärntoft & David M. Hallman & Camilla Zetterberg & Johan Larsson & Johanna Edvinsson & Helena Jahncke, 2021. "A Participatory Approach to Identify Key Areas for Sustainable Work Environment and Health in Employees with Flexible Work Arrangements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Zhou, Qingqing & Zhang, Chengzhi, 2021. "Breaking community boundary: Comparing academic and social communication preferences regarding global pandemics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    7. Martina Sukitsch & Sabrina Engert & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2015. "The Implementation of Corporate Sustainability in the European Automotive Industry: An Analysis of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Anne-Sophie Maillot & Thierry Meyer & Sophie Prunier-Poulmaire & Emilie Vayre, 2022. "A Qualitative and Longitudinal Study on the Impact of Telework in Times of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Andrea Micangeli & Vincenzo Naso & Emanuele Michelangeli & Apollonia Matrisciano & Francesca Farioli & Nicola P. Belfiore, 2014. "Attitudes toward Sustainability and Green Economy Issues Related to Some Students Learning Their Characteristics: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Perrigo, Judith L. & Samek, Anya & Hurlburt, Michael, 2022. "Minority and low-SES families’ experiences during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: A qualitative study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Gisela Redondo-Sama & Virginia Matulic & Ariadna Munté-Pascual & Irene de Vicente, 2020. "Social Work during the COVID-19 Crisis: Responding to Urgent Social Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cuc Lavinia Denisia & Rad Dana & Hațegan Camelia Daniela & Trifan Vanina Adoriana & Ardeleanu Titus, 2024. "The Mediating Role of the Financial Recommender System Advising Acceptance in the Relationship between Investments Trust and Decision-Making Behavior," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2260-2273.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Karmen Erjavec & Marjan Janžekovič & Milena Kovač & Mojca Simčič & Andrej Mergeduš & Dušan Terčič & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "Changes in Use of Communication Channels by Livestock Farmers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Yongrok Choi & Di Gao, 2014. "The Role of Intermediation in the Governance of Sustainable Chinese Web Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Alvaro Guitart Martín & Ricardo J. Palomo Zurdo, 2021. "Digital Inability and Social Sustainability in the Face of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Proposal of New Non-Financial Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Sonia Khawand & Matina Ghasemi & Seyed Arash Sahranavard, 2022. "Employee Involvement and Socialization as an Example of Sustainable Marketing Strategy and Organization’s Citizenship Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Beirut Hotel Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Ergün Kara & Melda Akbaba & Emre Yakut & Makbule Hürmet Çetinel & Mehmet Mert Pasli, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of Green Human Resources Management on the Relationship between Organizational Sustainability and Innovative Behavior: An Application in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Thurasamy Ramayah & Mohammad Falahat & Pedro Soto‐Acosta, 2022. "Effects of corporate social responsibility on employee commitment and corporate reputation: Evidence from a transitional economy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2006-2015, November.
    9. Simona Sternad Zabukovšek & Samo Bobek & Uroš Zabukovšek & Zoran Kalinić & Polona Tominc, 2022. "Enhancing PLS-SEM-Enabled Research with ANN and IPMA: Research Study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems’ Acceptance Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Zanellato Gianluca, 2021. "Quality of Information Disclosed in Integrated Reports, in the Extracting Sector: Insights from Europe," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Yu, Houqiang & Li, Longfei & Cao, Xueting & Chen, Tao, 2022. "Exploring country's preference over news mentions to academic papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    12. Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez & Ainhoa Garayar, 2015. "The Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the United Nations Global Compact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Yongan Zhang & Umair Khan & Seoyeon Lee & Madiha Salik, 2019. "The Influence of Management Innovation and Technological Innovation on Organization Performance. A Mediating Role of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Muhammad Mubushar & Shahid Rasool & Muhammad Imtiaz Haider & Roberto Cerchione, 2021. "The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on stakeholders' value co‐creation behaviour," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1906-1920, November.
    15. Qianqian Hu & Tianlun Zhu & Chien-Liang Lin & Tiejun Chen & Tachia Chin, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in China’s Manufacturing: A Global Perspective of Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2023. "A Configurational Evaluation of Spanish Teleworkers’ Perception and Nonperception of Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Salvatore Zappalà & Luca Radassao & Ferdinando Toscano, 2023. "Greening Organizations: The Relationship between Employee Environmental Concern, Perception of Advantages of Eco-Innovations, and Support for Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.
    19. Dhahri, Sabrine & Omri, Anis, 2020. "Foreign capital towards SDGs 1 & 2—Ending Poverty and hunger: The role of agricultural production," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 208-221.
    20. Stacy H. Lee & Jung Ha-Brookshire, 2017. "Ethical Climate and Job Attitude in Fashion Retail Employees’ Turnover Intention, and Perceived Organizational Sustainability Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9796-:d:883847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.