IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v106y2024ics0149718924000673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive risk assessment for identifying suitable residential zones in Manavgat, Mediterranean Region

Author

Listed:
  • Dogan, Sedat
  • Kilicoglu, Cem
  • Akinci, Halil
  • Sevik, Hakan
  • Cetin, Mehmet
  • Kocan, Nurhan

Abstract

The absence of comprehensive risk analysis in residential development within certain regions often leads to substantial human and material losses during natural disasters. The Mediterranean region, particularly susceptible to the impacts of climate change, is projected to witness an upsurge in the frequency of natural calamities like floods, landslides, and forest fires. Consequently, meticulous risk assessment during the selection of residential areas becomes paramount in this context. This study is dedicated to the evaluation of suitable residential zones in Manavgat, a pivotal location in the Mediterranean region with a progressively growing population. The findings indicate that approximately 4.26 % of the research area is deemed appropriate for residential establishment. The identification of these locations is crucial for ensuring human and material safety, as well as enhancing overall biocomfort. Moreover, this study provides a foundation for long-term planning initiatives within the region and makes a significant contribution to the international evaluation literature by demonstrating the application of integrated risk assessment methodologies in urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Dogan, Sedat & Kilicoglu, Cem & Akinci, Halil & Sevik, Hakan & Cetin, Mehmet & Kocan, Nurhan, 2024. "Comprehensive risk assessment for identifying suitable residential zones in Manavgat, Mediterranean Region," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borzacchiello, Maria Teresa & Torrieri, Vincenzo & Nijkamp, Peter, 2009. "An operational information systems architecture for assessing sustainable transportation planning: principles and design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 381-389, November.
    2. Koschinsky, Julia, 2013. "The case for spatial analysis in evaluation to reduce health inequities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 172-176.
    3. Granderson, Ainka A., 2011. "Enabling multi-faceted measures of success for protected area management in Trinidad and Tobago," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 185-195, August.
    4. Baig, Kamran & Shaw-Ridley, Mary & Munoz, Oscar J., 2016. "Applying geo-spatial analysis in community needs assessment: Implications for planning and prioritizing based on data," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 42-48.
    5. Gu, Zhouyi & Chen, Xihui & Parziale, Anna & Tang, Zhuoyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of primary-level credit environment, indicator system and empirical analysis: A case study of credit construction in China county and district," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Fernández-Díaz, Mª. Jose & Rodríguez-Mantilla, Jesús Miguel & Jover-Olmeda, Gonzalo, 2017. "Evaluation of the impact of intervention programmes on education organisations: Application to a Quality Management System," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 116-122.
    7. Ha, Kyoo-Man, 2019. "Integrating the resources of Korean disaster management research via the Johari window," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Lee, Jun Gon & Park, Min Jae, 2020. "Evaluation of technological competence and operations efficiency in the defense industry: The strategic planning of South Korea," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Bonfiglio, A. & Camaioni, B. & Carta, V. & Cristiano, S., 2023. "Estimating the common agricultural policy milestones and targets by neural networks," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marynia Kolak & Luc Anselin, 2020. "A Spatial Perspective on the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(1-2), pages 128-153, January.
    2. Zhang, Ganggang & Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Performance evaluation and enrollment quota allocation for higher education institutions in China," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Vladimir Jakovljevic & Mališa Zizovic & Dragan Pamucar & Željko Stević & Miloljub Albijanic, 2021. "Evaluation of Human Resources in Transportation Companies Using Multi-Criteria Model for Ranking Alternatives by Defining Relations between Ideal and Anti-Ideal Alternative (RADERIA)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Mendes, Juliana Veiga & Suyama, Suzi Sanae, 2016. "Shippers and freight operators perceptions of sustainable initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 173-181.
    5. Dipanwita De & Chandan Surabhi Das, 2021. "Measuring Livelihood Sustainability by PCA in Indian Sundarban," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18424-18442, December.
    6. Cerian Gibbes & Allison L. Hopkins & Armando Inurreta Díaz & Juan Jimenez-Osornio, 2020. "Defining and measuring sustainability: a systematic review of studies in rural Latin America and the Caribbean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 447-468, January.
    7. Eugenia Țigan & Radu Lucian Blaga & Florin-Lucian Isac & Monica Lungu & Ioana Anda Milin & Florin Tripa & Simona Gavrilaș, 2022. "Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Volker Frehe & Frank Teuteberg, 2017. "Information and communication technology in green logistics: status quo and research gaps," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 65-96, April.
    9. Liyin Shen & Lei Du & Xining Yang & Xiaoyun Du & Jinhuan Wang & Jianli Hao, 2018. "Sustainable Strategies for Transportation Development in Emerging Cities in China: A Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Moura e Sá, Patrícia & Fernandes, Carolina, 2020. "An assessment of a municipal physical activity programme for seniors based on the EFQM model: Integrating the views of internal and external stakeholders," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Reinhart Buenk & Sara S (Saartjie) Grobbelaar & Isabel Meyer, 2019. "A Framework for the Sustainability Assessment of (Micro)transit Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Miller, Harvey J., 2013. "Beyond sharing: cultivating cooperative transportation systems through geographic information science," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 296-308.
    13. Kooli, Chokri, 2019. "Governing and managing higher education institutions: The quality audit contributions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.