IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8235-d856676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Iron Tailings Suitable for Constructing the Soil Profile Configuration of Reclaimed Farmland? A Soil Quality Evaluation Based on Chronosequences

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjuan Jin

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Trinity Protection and Monitoring of Cultivated Land, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Han Wu

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Trinity Protection and Monitoring of Cultivated Land, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Zhongyi Wei

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Trinity Protection and Monitoring of Cultivated Land, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Chunlan Han

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Trinity Protection and Monitoring of Cultivated Land, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Zhenxing Bian

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Trinity Protection and Monitoring of Cultivated Land, Shenyang 110161, China)

  • Xufeng Zhang

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China)

Abstract

Iron tailings used as soil substitute materials to construct reclaimed farmland soil can effectively realize the large-scale resource utilization of iron tailings and reduce environmental risks. It is vital to understand the mechanisms affecting reclaimed soil quality and determine the appropriate pattern for reclamation with iron tailings. Thus, a soil quality index (SQI) was developed to evaluate the soil quality of reclaimed farmland with iron tailings in a semi-arid region. Soil samples were collected from two reclamation measures (20 cm subsoil + 20 cm iron tailings + 30 cm topsoil and 20 cm subsoil + 20 cm iron tailings + 50 cm topsoil) with reclamation years of 3 (R3), 5 (R5), and 10 (R10) at three soil depths (0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm) to measure 13 soil physicochemical properties in western Liaoning, China. Adjacent normal farmland (NF) acted as a reference. Results indicated that iron tailings were suitable for constructing the soil profile configuration of reclaimed farmland. SQI of reclaimed soil increased with the reclamation year, but it has not reached the NF level after 3 years, while it was better than NF after 5 years. The nutrient content of reclaimed soil increased with the reclamation year, but it still did not reach the NF level after 10 years. SQI of R10 (with 50 cm topsoil) was also better than NF but slightly lower than R5 (with 30 cm topsoil). For the semi-arid region with sticky soil texture, the topsoil thickness of reclamation was not the thicker the better, and 30 cm topsoil covered on iron tailings in western Liaoning could achieve a better reclamation effect than 50 cm.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjuan Jin & Han Wu & Zhongyi Wei & Chunlan Han & Zhenxing Bian & Xufeng Zhang, 2022. "Are Iron Tailings Suitable for Constructing the Soil Profile Configuration of Reclaimed Farmland? A Soil Quality Evaluation Based on Chronosequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8235-:d:856676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuai Li & Lifeng Yu & Wanjun Jiang & Haoxuan Yu & Xinmin Wang, 2022. "The Recent Progress China Has Made in Green Mine Construction, Part I: Mining Groundwater Pollution and Sustainable Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Linghua Duo & Zhenqi Hu, 2018. "Soil Quality Change after Reclaiming Subsidence Land with Yellow River Sediments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Javier Cortes-Ramirez & Darren Wraith & Peter D. Sly & Paul Jagals, 2022. "Mapping the Morbidity Risk Associated with Coal Mining in Queensland, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Wen Song & Wei Song & Haihong Gu & Fuping Li, 2020. "Progress in the Remote Sensing Monitoring of the Ecological Environment in Mining Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Leidy Marcela Ulloa-Murillo & Lina María Villegas & Alejandra Rocío Rodríguez-Ortiz & Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García, 2022. "Management of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste in the Context of a Sustainable and Circular Model: Analysis of Trends in Latin America and the Caribbean," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Zhenqi Hu & Shuguang Liu & Yuling Gong, 2021. "Evaluation of Soil Quality and Maize Growth in Different Profiles of Reclaimed Land with Coal Gangue Filling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gholami, Alireza & Tokac, Batur & Zhang, Qian, 2024. "Knowledge synthesis on the mine life cycle and the mining value chain to address climate change," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Yang Chen & Zhenqi Hu & Pengyu Li & Gensheng Li & Dongzhu Yuan & Jiaxin Guo, 2022. "Assessment and Effect of Mining Subsidence on Farmland in Coal–Crop Overlapped Areas: A Case of Shandong Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2022. "The Economic Situation of Polish Cities in Post-Mining Regions. Long-Term Analysis on the Example of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Liu, Quanlong & Qiu, Zunxiang & Li, Ma & Shang, Jianping & Niu, Weichao, 2023. "Evaluation and empirical research on green mine construction in coal industry based on the AHP-SPA model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Min Zhang & Yan Qiu & Chunling Li & Tao Cui & Mingxing Yang & Jun Yan & Wu Yang, 2023. "A Habitable Earth and Carbon Neutrality: Mission and Challenges Facing Resources and the Environment in China—An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-35, January.
    6. Guan, Yanjun & Wang, Juan & Zhou, Wei & Bai, Zhongke & Cao, Yingui, 2023. "Delimiting supervision zones to inform the revision of land reclamation management modes in coal mining areas: A perspective from the succession characteristics of rehabilitated vegetation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. He Gao & Wei Song, 2022. "Assessing the Landscape Ecological Risks of Land-Use Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Lei Zhang & Wei Song & Wen Song, 2020. "Assessment of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Lancang-Mekong Region, South East Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Niu, Juanjuan & He, Jun & He, Yiqun, 2024. "Harnessing FinTech for sustainable mineral development with innovative financing strategies in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Yueming Sun & Yanling Zhao & He Ren & Zhibin Li & Yanjie Tang, 2024. "Waterlogging Stability Identification: Ray-Based Model Application in Mining Areas with High Groundwater Levels—A Case Study of Huainan Coal Field," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Haoxuan Yu & Izni Zahidi, 2023. "Tailings Pond Classification Based on Satellite Images and Machine Learning: An Exploration of Microsoft ML.Net," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Song, Changji & Song, Jingru & Wu, Qiang & Shen, Xiaojun & Hu, Yawei & Hu, Caihong & Li, Wenhao & Wang, Zhenhua, 2023. "Effects of applying river sediment with irrigation water on salinity leaching during wheat-maize rotation in the Yellow River Delta," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023. "Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Oimahmad Rahmonov & Jacek Różkowski & Grzegorz Klys, 2022. "The Managing and Restoring of Degraded Land in Post-Mining Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3, February.
    15. Yuxia Zhao & Yang Wang & Zifan Zhang & Yi Zhou & Haoqing Huang & Ming Chang, 2023. "The Evolution of Landscape Patterns and Its Ecological Effects of Open-Pit Mining: A Case Study in the Heidaigou Mining Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Lingaitienė Olga & Burinskienė Aurelija, 2023. "Formation the links between circularity and sustainability in the circular economy," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Haoxuan Yu & Shuai Li & Lifeng Yu & Xinmin Wang, 2022. "The Recent Progress China Has Made in Green Mine Construction, Part II: Typical Examples of Green Mines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Chengqiang Li & Junxiao Wang & Liang Ge & Yujie Zhou & Shenglu Zhou, 2022. "Optimization of Sample Construction Based on NDVI for Cultivated Land Quality Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Xinbei Huang & Chengming Ye & Hongyu Tao & Junjie Zou & Yuzhan Zhou & Shufan Zheng, 2024. "Integrating Future Multi-Scenarios to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Li, Gensheng & Hu, Zhenqi & Li, Pengyu & Yuan, Dongzhu & Wang, Wenjuan & Yang, Kun, 2021. "The optimal framework and model to balance underground coal mining and cropland protection in Jining, eastern China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8235-:d:856676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.