IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p8196-d855676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workers’ Perception Heat Stress: Results from a Pilot Study Conducted in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Bonafede

    (Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Miriam Levi

    (Epidemiology Unit, Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority Tuscany Centre, 50135 Florence, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Emma Pietrafesa

    (Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Alessandra Binazzi

    (Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Alessandro Marinaccio

    (Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Marco Morabito

    (Institute of Bioeconomy, National Research Council (IBE-CNR), 50019 Florence, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Iole Pinto

    (Physical Agents Sector, Regional Public Health Laboratory, 53100 Siena, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Francesca de’ Donato

    (Department of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service, ASL ROMA 1, 00147 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Valentina Grasso

    (LaMMA Consortium—Weather Forecaster and Researcher at Laboratory of Monitoring and Environmental Modelling for Sustainable Development, 50019 Florence, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Tiziano Costantini

    (Department of Epidemiology Lazio Regional Health Service, ASL ROMA 1, 00147 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

  • Alessandro Messeri

    (LaMMA Consortium—Weather Forecaster and Researcher at Laboratory of Monitoring and Environmental Modelling for Sustainable Development, 50019 Florence, Italy
    Climate and Sustainability Foundation, 50100 Florence, Italy
    AMPRO—Professional Weather Association, 00142 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the WORKLIMATE Collaborative Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

Abstract

Many workers are exposed to the effects of heat and often to extreme temperatures. Heat stress has been further aggravated during the COVID-19 pandemic by the use of personal protective equipment to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, workers’ risk perception of heat stress is often low, with negative effects on their health and productivity. The study aims to identify workers’ needs and gaps in knowledge, suggesting the adaptation of measures that best comply with the needs of both workers and employers. A cross-sectional online questionnaire survey was conducted in Italy in the hottest months of 2020 (June–October) through different multimedia channels. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics; analytical tests and analysis of variance were used to evaluate differences between groups of workers. In total, 345 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. The whole sample of respondents declared that heat is an important contributor to productivity loss and 83% of workers did not receive heat warnings from their employer. In this context, the internet is considered as the main source of information about heat-related illness in the workplace. Results highlight the need to increase workers’ perception of heat stress in the workplace to safeguard their health and productivity. About two-thirds of the sample stated that working in the sun without access to shaded areas, working indoors without adequate ventilation, and nearby fire, steam, and hot surfaces, represent the main injuries’ risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Bonafede & Miriam Levi & Emma Pietrafesa & Alessandra Binazzi & Alessandro Marinaccio & Marco Morabito & Iole Pinto & Francesca de’ Donato & Valentina Grasso & Tiziano Costantini & Alessandro , 2022. "Workers’ Perception Heat Stress: Results from a Pilot Study Conducted in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8196-:d:855676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nanda Kaji Budhathoki & Kerstin K. Zander, 2019. "Socio-Economic Impact of and Adaptation to Extreme Heat and Cold of Farmers in the Food Bowl of Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Michael Siegrist & Carmen Keller & Henk A. L. Kiers, 2005. "A New Look at the Psychometric Paradigm of Perception of Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 211-222, February.
    3. Alessandro Messeri & Michela Bonafede & Emma Pietrafesa & Iole Pinto & Francesca de’Donato & Alfonso Crisci & Jason Kai Wei Lee & Alessandro Marinaccio & Miriam Levi & Marco Morabito & on behalf of th, 2021. "A Web Survey to Evaluate the Thermal Stress Associated with Personal Protective Equipment among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Sabrina K. Beckmann & Michael Hiete, 2020. "Predictors Associated with Health-Related Heat Risk Perception of Urban Citizens in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byoung Joon Kim & Seoyong Kim & Sunhee Kim, 2020. "Searching for New Directions for Energy Policy: Testing Three Causal Models of Risk Perception, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Energy Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Xiaoqin Zhu & Xiaofei Xie, 2015. "Effects of Knowledge on Attitude Formation and Change Toward Genetically Modified Foods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 790-810, May.
    3. Michael Siegrist & Philipp Hübner & Christina Hartmann, 2018. "Risk Prioritization in the Food Domain Using Deliberative and Survey Methods: Differences between Experts and Laypeople," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 504-524, March.
    4. Sachse, Katharina & Jungermann, Helmut & Belting, Julia M., 2012. "Investment risk – The perspective of individual investors," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 437-447.
    5. Myoungsoon You & Youngkee Ju, 2020. "The Outrage Effect of Personal Stake, Familiarity, Effects on Children, and Fairness on Climate Change Risk Perception Moderated by Political Orientation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Fadly Syah Arsad & Rozita Hod & Norfazilah Ahmad & Mazni Baharom & Fredolin Tangang, 2022. "The Malay-Version Knowledge, Risk Perception, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire on Heatwaves: Development and Construct Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Yingying Zhao & Meng Su & Xin Meng & Jiying Liu & Faming Wang, 2022. "Thermophysiological and Perceptual Responses of Amateur Healthcare Workers: Impacts of Ambient Condition, Inner-Garment Insulation and Personal Cooling Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Xizheng Xu & Ying Fan & Yunpeng Wu & Senlin Zhou, 2022. "Authenticity Mediates the Relationship between Risk Perception of COVID-19 and Subjective Well-Being: A Daily Diary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Kayode Ajewole & Elliott Dennis & Ted C. Schroeder & Jason Bergtold, 2021. "Relative valuation of food and non‐food risks with a comparison to actuarial values: A best–worst approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 927-943, November.
    10. Meredith Frances Dobbie & Rebekah Ruth Brown, 2014. "A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 294-308, February.
    11. Henry H. Willis & Michael L. DeKay, 2007. "The Roles of Group Membership, Beliefs, and Norms in Ecological Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 1365-1380, October.
    12. Sander C. S. Clahsen & Irene van Kamp & Betty C. Hakkert & Theo G. Vermeire & Aldert H. Piersma & Erik Lebret, 2019. "Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 439-461, February.
    13. Litao Feng & Zhuo Li & Zhihui Zhao, 2021. "Extreme Climate Shocks and Green Agricultural Development: Evidence from the 2008 Snow Disaster in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Erika Austhof & Heidi E. Brown, 2022. "Global Warming’s Six MTurks: A Secondary Analysis of a US-Based Online Crowdsourcing Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    15. Jagadeesh Puvvula & Azar M. Abadi & Kathryn C. Conlon & Jared J. Rennie & Hunter Jones & Jesse E. Bell, 2022. "Evaluating the Sensitivity of Heat Wave Definitions among North Carolina Physiographic Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Robert Coles & Gerard P. Hodgkinson, 2008. "A Psychometric Study of Information Technology Risks in the Workplace," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 81-93, February.
    17. Siegrist, Michael & Visschers, Vivianne H.M., 2013. "Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 112-119.
    18. Juan Ignacio Aragonés & César Tapia-Fonllem & Lucía Poggio & Blanca Fraijo-Sing, 2017. "Perception on the Risk of the Sonora River Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    19. Seda Erdem & Dan Rigby, 2013. "Investigating Heterogeneity in the Characterization of Risks Using Best Worst Scaling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1728-1748, September.
    20. Raquel Camprubi, 2024. "Residents’ Risk Perception in Developing Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8196-:d:855676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.