IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p612-d1019481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermophysiological and Perceptual Responses of Amateur Healthcare Workers: Impacts of Ambient Condition, Inner-Garment Insulation and Personal Cooling Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Yingying Zhao

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Meng Su

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Xin Meng

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Jiying Liu

    (School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Faming Wang

    (Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

While personal protective equipment (PPE) protects healthcare workers from viruses, it also increases the risk of heat stress. In this study, the effects of environmental heat stress, the insulation of the PPE inner-garment layer, and the personal cooling strategy on the physiological and perceptual responses of PPE-clad young college students were evaluated. Three levels of wet bulb globe temperatures (WBGT = 15 °C, 28 °C, and 32 °C) and two types of inner garments (0.37 clo and 0.75 clo) were chosen for this study. In an uncompensable heat stress environment (WBGT = 32 °C), the effects of two commercially available personal cooling systems, including a ventilation cooling system (VCS) and an ice pack cooling system (ICS) on the heat strain mitigation of PPE-clad participants were also assessed. At WBGT = 15 °C with 0.75 clo inner garments, mean skin temperatures were stabilized at 31.2 °C, H skin was 60–65%, and HR was about 75.5 bpm, indicating that the working scenario was on the cooler side. At WBGT = 28 °C, T skin plateaued at approximately 34.7 °C, and the participants reported “hot” thermal sensations. The insulation reduction in inner garments from 0.75 clo to 0.37 clo did not significantly improve the physiological thermal comfort of the participants. At WBGT = 32 °C, T skin was maintained at 35.2–35.7 °C, H skin was nearly 90% RH, T core exceeded 37.1 °C, and the mean HR was 91.9 bpm. These conditions indicated that such a working scenario was uncompensable, and personal cooling to mitigate heat stress was required. Relative to that in NCS (no cooling), the mean skin temperatures in ICS and VCS were reduced by 0.61 °C and 0.22 °C, respectively, and the heart rates were decreased by 10.7 and 8.5 bpm, respectively. Perceptual responses in ICS and VCS improved significantly throughout the entire field trials, with VCS outperforming ICS in the individual cooling effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingying Zhao & Meng Su & Xin Meng & Jiying Liu & Faming Wang, 2022. "Thermophysiological and Perceptual Responses of Amateur Healthcare Workers: Impacts of Ambient Condition, Inner-Garment Insulation and Personal Cooling Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:612-:d:1019481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Messeri & Michela Bonafede & Emma Pietrafesa & Iole Pinto & Francesca de’Donato & Alfonso Crisci & Jason Kai Wei Lee & Alessandro Marinaccio & Miriam Levi & Marco Morabito & on behalf of th, 2021. "A Web Survey to Evaluate the Thermal Stress Associated with Personal Protective Equipment among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Jimmy Lee & Vidhya Venugopal & P K Latha & Sharifah Badriyah Alhadad & Clarence Hong Wei Leow & Nicholas Yong De Goh & Esther Tan & Tord Kjellstrom & Marco Morabito & Jason Kai Wei Lee, 2020. "Heat Stress and Thermal Perception amongst Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in India and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Claudia Westermann & Nika Zielinski & Christiane Altenburg & Madeleine Dulon & Olaf Kleinmüller & Jan Felix Kersten & Albert Nienhaus, 2022. "Prevalence of Adverse Skin Reactions in Nursing Staff Due to Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Mariana Aparicio Betancourt & Andrea Duarte-Díaz & Helena Vall-Roqué & Laura Seils & Carola Orrego & Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez & Jaime Barrio-Cortes & María Teresa Beca-Martínez & Almudena Molina Serr, 2022. "Global Healthcare Needs Related to COVID-19: An Evidence Map of the First Year of the Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Coen C. W. G. Bongers & Johannus Q. de Korte & Mike Zwartkruis & Koen Levels & Boris R. M. Kingma & Thijs M. H. Eijsvogels, 2022. "Heat Strain and Use of Heat Mitigation Strategies among COVID-19 Healthcare Workers Wearing Personal Protective Equipment—A Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily J. Tetzlaff & Nicholas Goulet & Melissa Gorman & Gregory R. A. Richardson & Glen P. Kenny, 2023. "The Intersection of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the 2021 Heat Dome in Canadian Digital News Media: A Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Coen C. W. G. Bongers & Johannus Q. de Korte & Mike Zwartkruis & Koen Levels & Boris R. M. Kingma & Thijs M. H. Eijsvogels, 2022. "Heat Strain and Use of Heat Mitigation Strategies among COVID-19 Healthcare Workers Wearing Personal Protective Equipment—A Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Sheng-Chieh Lee & Ching-Yuan Lin & Ying-Ji Chuang, 2022. "The Study of Alternative Fire Commanders’ Training Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic Situation in New Taipei City, Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Michela Bonafede & Miriam Levi & Emma Pietrafesa & Alessandra Binazzi & Alessandro Marinaccio & Marco Morabito & Iole Pinto & Francesca de’ Donato & Valentina Grasso & Tiziano Costantini & Alessandro , 2022. "Workers’ Perception Heat Stress: Results from a Pilot Study Conducted in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. S Vivek Anand & Yao Kang Shuy & Poay Sian Sabrina Lee & Eng Sing Lee, 2021. "One Year on: An Overview of Singapore’s Response to COVID-19—What We Did, How We Fared, How We Can Move Forward," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-33, August.
    6. Alessandro Messeri & Michela Bonafede & Emma Pietrafesa & Iole Pinto & Francesca de’Donato & Alfonso Crisci & Jason Kai Wei Lee & Alessandro Marinaccio & Miriam Levi & Marco Morabito & on behalf of th, 2021. "A Web Survey to Evaluate the Thermal Stress Associated with Personal Protective Equipment among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Ngqabutho Moyo & Anita D. Bhappu & Moment Bhebhe & Farai Ncube, 2022. "Perceived Risk of COVID-19 and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Claudia Westermann & Nika Zielinski & Christiane Altenburg & Madeleine Dulon & Olaf Kleinmüller & Jan Felix Kersten & Albert Nienhaus, 2022. "Prevalence of Adverse Skin Reactions in Nursing Staff Due to Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Mariana Aparicio Betancourt & Andrea Duarte-Díaz & Helena Vall-Roqué & Laura Seils & Carola Orrego & Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez & Jaime Barrio-Cortes & María Teresa Beca-Martínez & Almudena Molina Serr, 2022. "Global Healthcare Needs Related to COVID-19: An Evidence Map of the First Year of the Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Mahbubur Meenar & Md Shahinoor Rahman & Jason Russack & Sarah Bauer & Kul Kapri, 2023. "“The Urban Poor and Vulnerable Are Hit Hardest by the Heat”: A Heat Equity Lens to Understand Community Perceptions of Climate Change, Urban Heat Islands, and Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:612-:d:1019481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.