IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1086-d487294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phenological Response in the Trophic Levels to Climate Change in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Minkyung Kim

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea)

  • Sojeong Lee

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea)

  • Hakyung Lee

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea)

  • Sangdon Lee

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea)

Abstract

The response of the phenological events of individual species to climate change is not isolated, but is connected through interaction with other species at the same or adjacent trophic level. Using long-term phenological data observed since 1976 in Korea, whose temperature has risen more steeply than the average global temperature, this study conducted phenological analysis (differ-ences in the phenology of groups, differences in phenological shifts due to climate change, differ-ences in phenological sensitivity to climate by groups, and the change of phenological day differ-ences among interacting groups). The phenological shift of the producer group (plants) was found to be negative in all researched species, which means that it blooms quickly over the years. The regression slope of consumers (primary consumers and secondary consumers) was generally posi-tive which means that the phenological events of these species tended to be later during the study period. The inter-regional deviation of phenological events was not large for any plant except for plum tree and Black locust. In addition, regional variations in high trophic levels of secondary consumers tended to be greater than that of producers and primary consumers. Among the studied species, plum was the most sensitive to temperature, and when the temperature rose by 1 °C, the flowering time of plum decreased by 7.20 days. As a result of checking the day differences in the phenological events of the interacting species, the phenological events of species were reversed, and butterflies have appeared earlier than plum, Korean forsythia, and Korean rosebay since 1990. Using long-term data from Korea, this study investigated differences in phenological reactions among trophic groups. There is a possibility of a phenological mismatch between trophic groups in the future if global warming continues due to differences in sensitivity to climate and phenological shifts between trophic levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Minkyung Kim & Sojeong Lee & Hakyung Lee & Sangdon Lee, 2021. "Phenological Response in the Trophic Levels to Climate Change in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1086-:d:487294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris D. Thomas & Alison Cameron & Rhys E. Green & Michel Bakkenes & Linda J. Beaumont & Yvonne C. Collingham & Barend F. N. Erasmus & Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira & Alan Grainger & Lee Hannah & Lesle, 2004. "Extinction risk from climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6970), pages 145-148, January.
    2. Stephen J. Thackeray & Peter A. Henrys & Deborah Hemming & James R. Bell & Marc S. Botham & Sarah Burthe & Pierre Helaouet & David G. Johns & Ian D. Jones & David I. Leech & Eleanor B. Mackay & Dario , 2016. "Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7611), pages 241-245, July.
    3. Sang-Don Lee, 2017. "Global Warming Leading to Phenological Responses in the Process of Urbanization, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-27, November.
    4. E. M. Wolkovich & B. I. Cook & J. M. Allen & T. M. Crimmins & J. L. Betancourt & S. E. Travers & S. Pau & J. Regetz & T. J. Davies & N. J. B. Kraft & T. R. Ault & K. Bolmgren & S. J. Mazer & G. J. McC, 2012. "Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7399), pages 494-497, May.
    5. Marcel E. Visser, 2016. "Interactions of climate change and species," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7611), pages 236-237, July.
    6. Heather M. Kharouba & Elizabeth M. Wolkovich, 2020. "Disconnects between ecological theory and data in phenological mismatch research," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(5), pages 406-415, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liam D. Bailey & Martijn Pol & Frank Adriaensen & Aneta Arct & Emilio Barba & Paul E. Bellamy & Suzanne Bonamour & Jean-Charles Bouvier & Malcolm D. Burgess & Anne Charmantier & Camillo Cusimano & Bla, 2022. "Bird populations most exposed to climate change are less sensitive to climatic variation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    3. Carlos Sanz-Lazaro, 2019. "A Framework to Advance the Understanding of the Ecological Effects of Extreme Climate Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Iara da Silva & Caroline Fernanda Hei Wikuats & Elizabeth Mie Hashimoto & Leila Droprinchinski Martins, 2022. "Effects of Environmental and Socioeconomic Inequalities on Health Outcomes: A Multi-Region Time-Series Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Omolola M. Adisa & Joel O. Botai & Abubeker Hassen & Daniel Darkey & Abiodun M. Adeola & Eyob Tesfamariam & Christina M. Botai & Abidemi T. Adisa, 2018. "Variability of Satellite Derived Phenological Parameters across Maize Producing Areas of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    8. Pearce, Joshua M. & Johnson, Sara J. & Grant, Gabriel B., 2007. "3D-mapping optimization of embodied energy of transportation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 435-453.
    9. Henzler, Julia & Weise, Hanna & Enright, Neal J. & Zander, Susanne & Tietjen, Britta, 2018. "A squeeze in the suitable fire interval: Simulating the persistence of fire-killed plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem under drier conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 389(C), pages 41-49.
    10. Andrew John & Avril Horne & Rory Nathan & Michael Stewardson & J. Angus Webb & Jun Wang & N. LeRoy Poff, 2021. "Climate change and freshwater ecology: Hydrological and ecological methods of comparable complexity are needed to predict risk," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), March.
    11. John H Matthews & Bart AJ Wickel & Sarah Freeman, 2011. "Converging Currents in Climate-Relevant Conservation: Water, Infrastructure, and Institutions," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-4, September.
    12. Brandt, Laura A. & Benscoter, Allison M. & Harvey, Rebecca & Speroterra, Carolina & Bucklin, David & Romañach, Stephanie S. & Watling, James I. & Mazzotti, Frank J., 2017. "Comparison of climate envelope models developed using expert-selected variables versus statistical selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 345(C), pages 10-20.
    13. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    14. Jorge Velásquez-Tibatá & María H Olaya-Rodríguez & Daniel López-Lozano & César Gutiérrez & Iván González & María C Londoño-Murcia, 2019. "BioModelos: A collaborative online system to map species distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Tasmin L. Rymer & Neville Pillay & Carsten Schradin, 2013. "Extinction or Survival? Behavioral Flexibility in Response to Environmental Change in the African Striped Mouse Rhabdomys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Feng, Zhiying & Tang, Wenhu & Niu, Zhewen & Wu, Qinghua, 2018. "Bi-level allocation of carbon emission permits based on clustering analysis and weighted voting: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1122-1135.
    17. Konrad Prandecki & Edyta Gajos, 2018. "Reductin of greenhouse gases emission and sustainability: The multi-criteria approach," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 7, pages 46-54.
    18. Alexander S Anderson & Collin J Storlie & Luke P Shoo & Richard G Pearson & Stephen E Williams, 2013. "Current Analogues of Future Climate Indicate the Likely Response of a Sensitive Montane Tropical Avifauna to a Warming World," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Di Traglia, Mario & Attorre, Fabio & Francesconi, Fabio & Valenti, Roberto & Vitale, Marcello, 2011. "Is cellular automata algorithm able to predict the future dynamical shifts of tree species in Italy under climate change scenarios? A methodological approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 925-934.
    20. Liu, Zhu & Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Liang, Sai & Anadon, Laura Diaz & Zhang, Chao & Guan, Dabo, 2015. "Four system boundaries for carbon accounts," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 118-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1086-:d:487294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.