IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p592-d478976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Benefits Analysis of Buildings Based on Different Renewal Strategies: The Emergy-Lca Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjing Cui

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Jingke Hong

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Guiwen Liu

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Kaijian Li

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Yuanyuan Huang

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Lin Zhang

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

Many cities have encountered challenges associated with rapid urban development, population growth and aging, in which urban renewal has become a promising option. Different renewal strategies, such as redevelopment, refurbishment and conservation, not only contributes to quality improvement and energy consumption reduction of dilapidated urban area, but also to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation. Such integrated benefits are often termed as co-benefits. However, choosing the most co-benefits strategy to adopt requires a holistic understanding of social-economic and environmental aspects, which has been less reported in the existing literature. Under such circumstance, this article aims to shed light on the co-benefits of different renewal strategies by adopting the Emergy-Life cycle assessment method. Then, the method is applied to one case study of the refurbishment of an educational building located in Chongqing, China. Resource allocation, CO 2 emissions and emergy-based indicators are calculated to assess the co-benefits during a 60-year research period, to compare the impacts of the complete demolition followed by a new one (rebuilding strategy) and the refurbishing of the existing building (refurbishment strategy). The case study shows that the annual emergy in the O&M phase of rebuilding strategy and refurbishment strategy were lower than existing building. Rebuilding and refurbishment strategies released approximately 59.1% and 80.6%, respectively, of the total CO 2 emissions that would be produced by the existing building. The results reveal that substantial environmental benefits can be obtained in both the refurbishment and rebuilding strategies. On the other hand, it can be concluded that the emergy yield ratio (EYR) for the rebuilding strategy is higher than refurbishment strategy, which demonstrate the better performance of refurbishment considering that less resources are required to generate greater benefits. In addition, the value of environmental loading ratio (ELR) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) also suggests that the refurbishment strategy performs better from the perspective of the environment. Thereby, the refurbishment strategy is more suitable than the rebuilding strategy. Findings from this study can be useful to urban planners and decision-makers in choosing the most suitable strategy to improve the quality of existing buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjing Cui & Jingke Hong & Guiwen Liu & Kaijian Li & Yuanyuan Huang & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Co-Benefits Analysis of Buildings Based on Different Renewal Strategies: The Emergy-Lca Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:592-:d:478976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubois, Maarten & Allacker, Karen, 2015. "Energy savings from housing: Ineffective renovation subsidies vs efficient demolition and reconstruction incentives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 697-704.
    2. Morelli, Martin & Harrestrup, Maria & Svendsen, Svend, 2014. "Method for a component-based economic optimisation in design of whole building renovation versus demolishing and rebuilding," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 305-314.
    3. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Le Truong, Nguyen, 2018. "Primary energy benefits of cost-effective energy renovation of a district heated multi-family building under different energy supply systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 69-90.
    4. He, K. & Lei, Y. & Pan, X. & Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Q. & Chen, D., 2010. "Co-benefits from energy policies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 4265-4272.
    5. Chau, C.K. & Leung, T.M. & Ng, W.Y., 2015. "A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 395-413.
    6. Power, Anne, 2008. "Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4487-4501, December.
    7. Mateus, Ricardo & Silva, Sandra Monteiro & de Almeida, Manuela Guedes, 2019. "Environmental and cost life cycle analysis of the impact of using solar systems in energy renovation of Southern European single-family buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 82-92.
    8. Lina La Fleur & Patrik Rohdin & Bahram Moshfegh, 2019. "Energy Renovation versus Demolition and Construction of a New Building—A Comparative Analysis of a Swedish Multi-Family Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Pan, Wei & Li, Kaijian & Teng, Yue, 2018. "Rethinking system boundaries of the life cycle carbon emissions of buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 379-390.
    10. Lee, Jae Min & Braham, William W., 2017. "Building emergy analysis of Manhattan: Density parameters for high-density and high-rise developments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 157-171.
    11. Dong, Huijuan & Dai, Hancheng & Dong, Liang & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Klimont, Zbigniew & Inoue, Tsuyoshi & Bunya, Shintaro & Fujii, Minoru & Masui, Toshihiko, 2015. "Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 165-174.
    12. He, Bao-Jie & Zhu, Jin & Zhao, Dong-Xue & Gou, Zhong-Hua & Qi, Jin-Da & Wang, Junsong, 2019. "Co-benefits approach: Opportunities for implementing sponge city and urban heat island mitigation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 147-157.
    13. Liu, Yilun & Zhu, A-Xing & Wang, Jingli & Li, Wenkai & Hu, Guohua & Hu, Yueming, 2019. "Land-use decision support in brownfield redevelopment for urban renewal based on crowdsourced data and a presence-and-background learning (PBL) method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoru Zheng & Chunling Sun & Jingjing Liu, 2024. "Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village renovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Hechi Wang & Zerong Yan & Junxue Zhang & Hongying Wang & Zhaoyi Yan & Xinxin Chen & Xinyi He & Jianwei Ge & Qi Zhou, 2023. "A Study on Ecological Emergy and Carbon-Emissions-Coupling Sustainability of Building Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhongyao Cai & Xiaohui Yang & Huaxing Lin & Xinyu Yang & Ping Jiang, 2022. "Study on the Co-Benefits of Air Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin: An Assessment Based on a Spatial Econometric Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Yanfang Dong & Caihang Liang & Lili Guo & Xiaoliang Cai & Weipeng Hu, 2023. "Life Cycle Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Sensitivity Analysis of Elevators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Wei, Xinyang & Tong, Qing & Magill, Iain & Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & Betz, Regina, 2020. "Evaluation of potential co-benefits of air pollution control and climate mitigation policies for China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Pan, W. & Teng, Y., 2021. "A systematic investigation into the methodological variables of embodied carbon assessment of buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Wang, Lining & Patel, Pralit L. & Yu, Sha & Liu, Bo & McLeod, Jeff & Clarke, Leon E. & Chen, Wenying, 2016. "Win–Win strategies to promote air pollutant control policies and non-fossil energy target regulation in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 244-253.
    6. Kong, Minjin & Hong, Taehoon & Ji, Changyoon & Kang, Hyuna & Lee, Minhyun, 2020. "Development of building driven-energy payback time for energy transition of building with renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Li, Clyde Zhengdao & Lai, Xulu & Xiao, Bing & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Guo, Shan & Zhao, Yiyu, 2020. "A holistic review on life cycle energy of buildings: An analysis from 2009 to 2019," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Josef Navrátil & Petr Klusáček & Stanislav Martinát & Petr Dvořák, 2021. "Emergence of Centralized (Collective) and Decentralized (Individual) Environmentally Friendly Solutions during the Regeneration of a Residential Building in a Post-Socialist City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Lina La Fleur & Patrik Rohdin & Bahram Moshfegh, 2019. "Energy Renovation versus Demolition and Construction of a New Building—A Comparative Analysis of a Swedish Multi-Family Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Dubois, Maarten & Allacker, Karen, 2015. "Energy savings from housing: Ineffective renovation subsidies vs efficient demolition and reconstruction incentives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 697-704.
    11. Li, Wenjia & Hao, Yong & Wang, Hongsheng & Liu, Hao & Sui, Jun, 2017. "Efficient and low-carbon heat and power cogeneration with photovoltaics and thermochemical storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1523-1531.
    12. Burek, Jasmina & Nutter, Darin W., 2019. "A life cycle assessment-based multi-objective optimization of the purchased, solar, and wind energy for the grocery, perishables, and general merchandise multi-facility distribution center network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1427-1446.
    13. Yang Yang & Ji-Qin Ni & Weiqing Bao & Lei Zhao & Guang Hui Xie, 2019. "Potential Reductions in Greenhouse Gas and Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Using Corn Stover for Ethanol Production in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Kiriyama, Eriko & Kajikawa, Yuya & Fujita, Katsuhide & Iwata, Shuichi, 2013. "A lead for transvaluation of global nuclear energy research and funded projects in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 145-153.
    15. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Optimal carbon taxes for China and implications for power generation, welfare, and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Meng, Ming & Niu, Dongxiao, 2011. "Modeling CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion using the logistic equation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3355-3359.
    17. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    18. Yuanxin Liu & FengYun Li & Yi Wang & Xinhua Yu & Jiahai Yuan & Yuwei Wang, 2018. "Assessing the Environmental Impact Caused by Power Grid Projects in High Altitude Areas Based on BWM and Vague Sets Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Xi Yang & Xiaoqian Xi & Shan Guo & Wanqi Lin & Xiangzhao Feng, 2018. "Carbon Mitigation Pathway Evaluation and Environmental Benefit Analysis of Mitigation Technologies in China’s Petrochemical and Chemical Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Yang, Jin & Song, Dan & Wu, Feng, 2017. "Regional variations of environmental co-benefits of wind power generation in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1267-1281.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:592-:d:478976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.