IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12968-d698076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influential Factors for Sustainable Intention to Visit a National Park during COVID-19: The Extended Theory of Planned Behavior with Perception of Risk and Coping Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Bo-Hyun Seong

    (Department of Co-Prosperity Research, Chungbuk Research Institute, Cheongju 28517, Korea)

  • Youngseok Choi

    (Department of Strategic Planning, Incheon Tourism Organization, Gaetbeol-ro 12, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21999, Korea)

  • Hyojin Kim

    (Department of Tourism Management, Mokpo National University, Yeongsan-ro 1666, Cheonggye-myeon, Muan-gun 58554, Korea)

Abstract

Despite the danger of the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, visits to natural tourism destinations such as national parks are continuing, though people are using less congested trails or minimizing personal contact. Given the danger from COVID-19, the purpose of our study was to use an expanded theory of planned behavior to analyze whether tourists intend to continue to visit national parks. Another purpose for our study was to compare an extant research model based on the theory of planned behavior with the extended model we developed. Frequency analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and other statistical techniques, such as correlation analysis, parsimonious fit index, and squared multiple correlations were employed according to the appropriate objectives. Additionally, the number of 351 participants joined the survey. Our study found that perception of risk of COVID-19 negatively affected attitude and perceived behavioral control in both models. Moreover, the perceived behavioral control had a positive effect on coping behavior. Given the analytical results, our study presents not only theoretical implications for understanding the behavior of those who visit national parks, but also practical implications for operation and management of national parks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo-Hyun Seong & Youngseok Choi & Hyojin Kim, 2021. "Influential Factors for Sustainable Intention to Visit a National Park during COVID-19: The Extended Theory of Planned Behavior with Perception of Risk and Coping Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12968-:d:698076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Yipeng Liu & Jong Min Lee & Celia Lee, 2020. "The challenges and opportunities of a global health crisis: the management and business implications of COVID-19 from an Asian perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 277-297, July.
    3. Barua, Suborna, 2020. "Understanding Coronanomics: The economic implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic," MPRA Paper 99693, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Myong Jae Lee & Heesup Han, 2020. "Smart Hotels and Sustainable Consumer Behavior: Testing the Effect of Perceived Performance, Attitude, and Technology Readiness on Word-of-Mouth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Mitchell, Vincent-Wayne & Davies, Fiona & Moutinho, Luiz & Vassos, Vassiliades, 1999. "Using Neural Networks to Understand Service Risk in the Holiday Product," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 167-180, October.
    6. Paul Slovic & Baruch Fischhoff & Sarah Lichtenstein, 1982. "Why Study Risk Perception?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 83-93, June.
    7. Tunner, John Jr. & Day, Ellen & Crask, Melvin R., 1989. "Protection motivation theory : An extension of fear appeals theory in communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 267-276, December.
    8. Yung-Jaan Lee, 2018. "Relationships among Environmental Attitudes, Risk Perceptions, and Coping Behavior: A Case Study of Four Environmentally Sensitive Townships in Yunlin County, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Quintal, Vanessa Ann & Lee, Julie Anne & Soutar, Geoffrey N., 2010. "Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 797-805.
    10. Mary Monica Jiony & Tek Yew Lew & Daria Gom & Geoffrey Harvey Tanakinjal & Stephen Sondoh, 2021. "Influence of Cultural Intelligence and Psychological Capital on Service Quality: A Study of the Hotel Industry in Sabah, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soyoung An & Jinkyung Choi & Thomas Eck & Huirang Yim, 2023. "Perceived Risk and Food Tourism: Pursuing Sustainable Food Tourism Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2021. "Does Risk Awareness of COVID-19 Affect Visits to National Parks? Analyzing the Tourist Decision-Making Process Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Md. Kamrul Hasan & Ahmed Rageh Ismail & MD. Faridul Islam, 2017. "Tourist risk perceptions and revisit intention: A critical review of literature," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1412874-141, January.
    3. Bo-Kyeong Kim & Kyoung-Ok Kim, 2020. "Relationship between Viewing Motivation, Presence, Viewing Satisfaction, and Attitude toward Tourism Destinations Based on TV Travel Reality Variety Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Jennifer Heiny & Icek Ajzen & Ingrid-Ute Leonhäuser & Peter Schmidt, 2019. "Intentions to Enhance Tourism in Private Households: Explanation and Mediated Effects of Entrepreneurial Experience," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 5(2), pages 128-148, July.
    5. Peng Shi & Frank Vanclay & Jin Yu, 2022. "Post-Resettlement Support Policies, Psychological Factors, and Farmers’ Homestead Exit Intention and Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    7. Eugene Song & Jae-Eun Lee & Seola Kwon, 2021. "Effect of Public Empathy with Infection-Control Guidelines on Infection-Prevention Attitudes and Behaviors: Based on the Case of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Jun Hwan Kim & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2019. "Understanding the Repurchase Intention of Premium Economy Passengers Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Jenni Soo-Hee Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "The Determinants of Visit Intention for Chinese Residents in the Michigan, United States: An Empirical Analysis Performed Through PLS-SEM," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    10. Meredith Frances Dobbie & Rebekah Ruth Brown, 2014. "A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 294-308, February.
    11. Salman Majeed & Changbao Lu & Mahwash Majeed & Muahmmad Naeem Shahid, 2018. "Health Resorts and Multi-Textured Perceptions of International Health Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Han, Heesup & Yu, Jongsik & Kim, Wansoo, 2019. "An electric airplane: Assessing the effect of travelers' perceived risk, attitude, and new product knowledge," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 33-42.
    13. Lin, Li-Pin (Lynn) & Yu, Chia-Yuan & Chang, Fu-Chen, 2018. "Determinants of CSER practices for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: From the perspectives of administrative managers in tour operators," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    15. Byoung Joon Kim & Seoyong Kim & Youngcheoul Kang & Sohee Kim, 2022. "Searching for the New Behavioral Model in Energy Transition Age: Analyzing the Forward and Reverse Causal Relationships between Belief, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Policy across Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, June.
    16. Ying Teng & Zhenzhong Ma & Lei Jing, 2021. "Explore the World Responsibly: The Antecedents of Ethical Tourism Behaviors in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Wang, Jie & Ritchie, Brent W., 2012. "Understanding accommodation managers’ crisis planning intention: An application of the theory of planned behaviour," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1057-1067.
    18. Quintal, Vanessa Ann & Thomas, Ben & Phau, Ian, 2015. "Incorporating the winescape into the theory of planned behaviour: Examining ‘new world’ wineries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 596-609.
    19. Mohd Azhar & Ruksar Ali & Sheeba Hamid & Mohd Junaid Akhtar & Mohd Nayyer Rahman, 2022. "Demystifying the effect of social media eWOM on revisit intention post-COVID-19: an extension of theory of planned behavior," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Hyunae Lee & Namho Chung, 2020. "Relationships among Beliefs, Attitudes, Time Resources, Subjective Norms, and Intentions to Use Wearable Augmented Reality in Art Galleries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12968-:d:698076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.