IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11285-d665972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age-Related Digital Divide during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Song

    (XIPU Institution, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China
    Department of China Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Chenfei Qian

    (Department of China Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Susan Pickard

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK)

Abstract

China has adopted a variety of digital technologies to effectively combat the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. The massive utilisation of digital technologies, however, to a great extent, magnifies the age-related digital divide. This paper aims to examine the impacts of the age-related digital divide on older adults in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cases of three age-related digital divide scenarios, including older people taking public transportation, seeking medical care, as well as conducting digital transactions, are collected from Chinese official news outlets. The results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerates the pace of digital technology utilisation but exacerbates the age-related digital divide. Such an age-related digital divide has largely excluded older adults from both the real society and the virtual society. Older adults’ personal attitudes and motivations, as well as education and income, governmental policies, and family and social supports, are all major contributors to the severe impacts of the age-related digital divide on old adults during the pandemic. More measures should be adopted to bridge the age-related digital divide and build a senior-friendly e-society.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Song & Chenfei Qian & Susan Pickard, 2021. "Age-Related Digital Divide during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11285-:d:665972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torben M. Andersen & Giuseppe Bertola & Cecilia Garcia-Peñalosa & Clemens Fuest & Harold James & Jan-Egbert Sturm & Branko Uroševic, 2020. "Chapter 2: Digital and Technical Transformation," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 38-55, March.
    2. Oliver Huxhold & Elena Hees & Noah J. Webster, 2020. "Towards bridging the grey digital divide: changes in internet access and its predictors from 2002 to 2014 in Germany," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 271-280, September.
    3. Essien D. Essien, 2018. "Ethical Implications of the Digital Divide and Social Exclusion: Imperative for Cyber-Security Culture in Africa," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 14-25, January.
    4. Oecd, 2020. "Going Digital integrated policy framework," OECD Digital Economy Papers 292, OECD Publishing.
    5. Choudrie, Jyoti & Junior, Chike-Obuekwe & McKenna, Brad & Richter, Shahper, 2018. "Understanding and conceptualising the adoption, use and diffusion of mobile banking in older adults: A research agenda and conceptual framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 449-465.
    6. Bora LY, 2020. "Challenge and perspective for Digital Silk Road," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1804180-180, January.
    7. Sang-Eon Han, 2020. "Fixed Point Sets of Digital Curves and Digital Surfaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    9. Chetty, Krish & Qigui, Liu & Gcora, Nozibele & Josie, Jaya & Wenwei, Li & Fang, Chen, 2018. "Bridging the digital divide: Measuring digital literacy," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-20.
    10. Theo G van Tilburg & Stephanie Steinmetz & Elske Stolte & Henriëtte van der Roest & Daniel H de Vries & Deborah Carr, 2021. "Loneliness and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study Among Dutch Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(7), pages 249-255.
    11. Woochun Jun, 2020. "A Study on the Current Status and Improvement of the Digital Divide among Older People in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Balandina D. M., 2020. "Advantages And Disadvantages Of Digital Economy," Annals of marketing-mba, Department of Marketing, Marketing MBA (RSconsult), vol. 2, May.
    13. Parmar, Rashik & Leiponen, Aija & Thomas, Llewellyn D.W., 2020. "Building an organizational digital twin," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 725-736.
    14. Iancu, Ioana & Iancu, Bogdan, 2020. "Designing mobile technology for elderly. A theoretical overview," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Ramona Alice Bran & Gabriela Grosseck, 2020. "Press RESET: Digitalising Education in Disruptive Times," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup2), pages 39-48, June.
    16. Kwok-Kee Wei & Hock-Hai Teo & Hock Chuan Chan & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-187, March.
    17. Kristin Biesenbender & Christian Breuer & Cora Wacker-Theodorakopoulos, 2020. "Digitale Potenziale nutzen und gestalten [Using and shaping digital potential]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(1), pages 2-3, April.
    18. Blix, Mårten, 2020. "Money for Nothin’ – Digitalization and Fluid Tax Bases," Working Paper Series 1316, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    19. Muhammed Gul, 2020. "Digital business strategies and competitive superiority," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 2(1), pages 17-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siyu Zhou & Ziling Ni & Atsushi Ogihara & Xiaohe Wang, 2022. "Behavioral Patterns of Supply and Demand Sides of Health Services for the Elderly in Sustainable Digital Transformation: A Mixed Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Lourdes E. Barón-Miras & Antoni Sisó-Almirall & Belchin Kostov & Encarna Sánchez & Silvia Roura & Jaume Benavent-Àreu & Luis González-de Paz, 2022. "Face-to-Face and Tele-Consults: A Study of the Effects on Diagnostic Activity and Patient Demand in Primary Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Alicia Murciano-Hueso & Antonio-Víctor Martín-García & Ana Paula Cardoso, 2022. "Technology and Quality of Life of Older People in Times of COVID: A Qualitative Study on Their Changed Digital Profile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Ting Zhang & Rosalam Che Me & Hassan Alli, 2023. "The Usability Issues Encountered in the Design Features of Intelligent Products for Older Adults in China: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Yi Xue Fang & Sarjit S. Gill & Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran & Mohd Roslan Rosnon & Ahmad Tarmizi Talib & Azureen Abd Aziz, 2022. "Digital Divide: An Inquiry on the Native Communities of Sabah," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Yanglin Li & Yuezheng Yang & Shuyao Shi & Bin Wang & Guangquan Chen, 2024. "Seniors’ Knowledge-Based Digital Marginalization in the Era of Information Technology Advancements," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12622-12650, September.
    7. Ren, Wei & Zhu, Xiaowen, 2024. "The age-based digital divides in China: Trends and socioeconomic differentials (2010–2020)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tandon, Anushree & Dhir, Amandeep & Islam, Nazrul & Talwar, Shalini & Mäntymäki, Matti, 2021. "Psychological and behavioral outcomes of social media-induced fear of missing out at the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 186-197.
    2. Sörries, Bernd & Franken, Matthias & Baischew, Dajan & Lucidi, Stefano, 2020. "Einfluss von Versorgungsauflagen auf die Mobilfunkabdeckung in der EU," WIK Discussion Papers 470, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    3. Paolo Franco, 2023. "Older consumers and technology: A critical systematic literature review," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 92-121, June.
    4. Shao, Qinglong & Kostka, Genia, 2023. "The COVID-19 pandemic and deepening digital inequalities in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    5. Serrano-Cinca, C. & Muñoz-Soro, J.F. & Brusca-Alijarde, I., 2015. "A multivariate study of the digital divide and digital exclusion," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127178, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Leavens, Laura & Bauchet, Jonathan & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob, 2021. "After the project is over: Measuring longer-term impacts of a food safety intervention in Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Gregorio Gimenez & Luis Vargas-Montoya, 2021. "ICT Use and Successful Learning: The Role of the Stock of Human Capital," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Yoshida, Masayuki & James, Jeffrey D. & Cronin, J. Joseph, 2013. "Sport event innovativeness: Conceptualization, measurement, and its impact on consumer behavior," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 68-84.
    9. Brenda Mak & Paul Beckman & Nicole Bohn, 2016. "Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction of Mobile Phone for Users with Disabilities," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Waqas Shair & Muhammad Tayyab & Sumaira Nawaz & Kanza Amjad, 2023. "Digital Divide In Pakistan: Barriers To Ict Adoption," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(2), pages 243-252.
    11. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    12. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Oleksandr Humennyi & Oleksandr Radkevych & Valentyna Radkevych, 2021. "An environmental approach to developing and applying smart complexes of academic disciplines in professional training of future specialists," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 516-539, July.
    14. Dan Ma & Hao Yuan, 2021. "Neighborhood Environment, Internet Use and Mental Distress among Older Adults: The Case of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Suzie Noten & Annerieke Stoop & Jasper De Witte & Elleke Landeweer & Floor Vinckers & Nina Hovenga & Leonieke C. van Boekel & Katrien G. Luijkx, 2022. "“Precious Time Together Was Taken Away”: Impact of COVID-19 Restrictive Measures on Social Needs and Loneliness from the Perspective of Residents of Nursing Homes, Close Relatives, and Volunteers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Kai-Lung Hui & I. P. L. Png, 2015. "Research Note—Migration of Service to the Internet: Evidence from a Federal Natural Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 606-618, September.
    17. Andrii Karkach & Tetyana Semigina, 2021. "Цифрові Компетентності Соціальних Працівників Як Передумова Готовності До Навчання Літніх Людей [Social Workers’ Digital Competencies as a Prerequisite of their Readyness for Education of Elderly P," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 7(05), pages 5008-5018, May.
    18. Vásáry, Viktória & Szabolcs, Biró, 2020. "Long-term vision of rural areas in Hungary, focusing on foresights," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 17.
    19. Sanal Kumar Velayudhan, 2019. "Factors influencing online shopping in rural India: A review," Working papers 314, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    20. Yuanren Zhou & Menggen Chen & Xiaojie Liu & Yun Chen, 2024. "A New Framework, Measurement, and Determinants of the Digital Divide in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-30, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11285-:d:665972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.