IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11215-d664701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Bayesian Spatial Models for HIV Mapping in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kassahun Abere Ayalew

    (School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

  • Samuel Manda

    (School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
    Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
    Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)

  • Bo Cai

    (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

Abstract

Despite making significant progress in tackling its HIV epidemic, South Africa, with 7.7 million people living with HIV, still has the biggest HIV epidemic in the world. The Government, in collaboration with developmental partners and agencies, has been strengthening its responses to the HIV epidemic to better target the delivery of HIV care, treatment strategies and prevention services. Population-based household HIV surveys have, over time, contributed to the country’s efforts in monitoring and understanding the magnitude and heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic. Local-level monitoring of progress made against HIV and AIDS is increasingly needed for decision making. Previous studies have provided evidence of substantial subnational variation in the HIV epidemic. Using HIV prevalence data from the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey, we compare three spatial smoothing models, namely, the intrinsically conditionally autoregressive normal, Laplace and skew-t (ICAR-normal, ICAR-Laplace and ICAR-skew-t) in the estimation of the HIV prevalence across 52 districts in South Africa. The parameters of the resulting models are estimated using Bayesian approaches. The skewness parameter for the ICAR-skew-t model was not statistically significant, suggesting the absence of skewness in the HIV prevalence data. Based on the deviance information criterion (DIC) model selection, the ICAR-normal and ICAR-Laplace had DIC values of 291.3 and 315, respectively, which were lower than that of the ICAR-skewed t (348.1). However, based on the model adequacy criterion using the conditional predictive ordinates (CPO), the ICAR-skew-t distribution had the lowest CPO value. Thus, the ICAR-skew-t was the best spatial smoothing model for the estimation of HIV prevalence in our study.

Suggested Citation

  • Kassahun Abere Ayalew & Samuel Manda & Bo Cai, 2021. "A Comparison of Bayesian Spatial Models for HIV Mapping in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11215-:d:664701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Azzalini & A. Capitanio, 1999. "Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distribution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(3), pages 579-602.
    2. Palacios, M. Blanca & Steel, Mark F.J., 2006. "Non-Gaussian Bayesian Geostatistical Modeling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 604-618, June.
    3. Leonhard Knorr‐Held & Nicola G. Best, 2001. "A shared component model for detecting joint and selective clustering of two diseases," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 164(1), pages 73-85.
    4. Julian Besag & Jeremy York & Annie Mollié, 1991. "Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20, March.
    5. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    6. R.B. Arellano-Valle & H. Bolfarine & V.H. Lachos, 2007. "Bayesian Inference for Skew-normal Linear Mixed Models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 663-682.
    7. Zareifard, Hamid & Jafari Khaledi, Majid, 2013. "Non-Gaussian modeling of spatial data using scale mixing of a unified skew Gaussian process," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 16-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Teimourian & T. Baghfalaki & M. Ganjali & D. Berridge, 2015. "Joint modeling of mixed skewed continuous and ordinal longitudinal responses: a Bayesian approach," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 2233-2256, October.
    2. Massimo Bilancia & Giacomo Demarinis, 2014. "Bayesian scanning of spatial disease rates with integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA)," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(1), pages 71-94, March.
    3. Douglas R. M. Azevedo & Marcos O. Prates & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2021. "MSPOCK: Alleviating Spatial Confounding in Multivariate Disease Mapping Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 464-491, September.
    4. Li Xu & Qingshan Jiang & David R. Lairson, 2019. "Spatio-Temporal Variation of Gender-Specific Hypertension Risk: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Jane Law & Christopher Perlman, 2018. "Exploring Geographic Variation of Mental Health Risk and Service Utilization of Doctors and Hospitals in Toronto: A Shared Component Spatial Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Huang Yangxin & Chen Jiaqing & Yan Chunning, 2012. "Mixed-Effects Joint Models with Skew-Normal Distribution for HIV Dynamic Response with Missing and Mismeasured Time-Varying Covariate," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, November.
    7. Qingyun Du & Mingxiao Zhang & Yayan Li & Hui Luan & Shi Liang & Fu Ren, 2016. "Spatial Patterns of Ischemic Heart Disease in Shenzhen, China: A Bayesian Multi-Disease Modelling Approach to Inform Health Planning Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Ping Yin & Lan Mu & Marguerite Madden & John Vena, 2014. "Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of spatio-temporal patterns of lung cancer incidence risk in Georgia, USA: 2000–2007," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 387-407, October.
    9. Rodrigues, E.C. & Assunção, R., 2012. "Bayesian spatial models with a mixture neighborhood structure," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 88-102.
    10. Hanze Zhang & Yangxin Huang, 2020. "Quantile regression-based Bayesian joint modeling analysis of longitudinal–survival data, with application to an AIDS cohort study," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 339-368, April.
    11. Xiaoping Jin & Sudipto Banerjee & Bradley P. Carlin, 2007. "Order‐free co‐regionalized areal data models with application to multiple‐disease mapping," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 817-838, November.
    12. Azzalini, Adelchi, 2022. "An overview on the progeny of the skew-normal family— A personal perspective," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Quick, Matthew & Li, Guangquan & Brunton-Smith, Ian, 2018. "Crime-general and crime-specific spatial patterns: A multivariate spatial analysis of four crime types at the small-area scale," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 22-32.
    14. Oludare Samuel Ariyo & Matthew Adekunle Adeleke, 2022. "Simultaneous Bayesian modelling of skew-normal longitudinal measurements with non-ignorable dropout," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 303-325, March.
    15. Lin, Tsung I. & Ho, Hsiu J. & Chen, Chiang L., 2009. "Analysis of multivariate skew normal models with incomplete data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(10), pages 2337-2351, November.
    16. Padilla, Juan L. & Azevedo, Caio L.N. & Lachos, Victor H., 2018. "Multidimensional multiple group IRT models with skew normal latent trait distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 250-268.
    17. Eibich, Peter & Ziebarth, Nicolas, 2014. "Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects in Germany Using Hierarchical Bayes Models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49, pages 305-320.
    18. Mayer Alvo & Jingrui Mu, 2023. "COVID-19 Data Analysis Using Bayesian Models and Nonparametric Geostatistical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Ying C. MacNab, 2018. "Some recent work on multivariate Gaussian Markov random fields," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 497-541, September.
    20. Francisca Corpas-Burgos & Miguel A. Martinez-Beneito, 2021. "An Autoregressive Disease Mapping Model for Spatio-Temporal Forecasting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11215-:d:664701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.