IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10692-d654316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Knowledge Management of Construction Safety Standards Based on Knowledge Graphs: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yukun Jiang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xin Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Wenxin Su

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jinrong Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Construction safety standards (CSS) have knowledge characteristics, but few studies have introduced knowledge graphs (KG) as a tool into CSS management. In order to improve CSS knowledge management, this paper first analyzed the knowledge structure of 218 standards and obtained three knowledge levels of CSS. Second, a concept layer was designed which consisted of five levels of concepts and eight types of relationships. Third, an entity layer containing 147 entities was constructed via entity identification, attribute extraction and entity extraction. Finally, 177 nodes and 11 types of attributes were collected and the construction of a knowledge graph of construction safety standard (KGCSS) was completed using knowledge storage. Furthermore, we implemented knowledge inference and obtained CSS planning, i.e., the list of standard work plans used to guide the development and revision of CSS. In addition, we conducted CSS knowledge retrieval; a process which supports interrogative input. The construction of KGCSS thus facilitates the analysis, querying, and sharing of safety standards knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukun Jiang & Xin Gao & Wenxin Su & Jinrong Li, 2021. "Systematic Knowledge Management of Construction Safety Standards Based on Knowledge Graphs: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10692-:d:654316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianzhuo Yan & Tiantian Lv & Yongchuan Yu, 2018. "Construction and Recommendation of a Water Affair Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Zhang, Chuan & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Zhou, Li & Kraft, Markus, 2017. "Knowledge management of eco-industrial park for efficient energy utilization through ontology-based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1412-1421.
    3. Qi Zhang & Yuanqiao Wen & Chunhui Zhou & Hai Long & Dong Han & Fan Zhang & Changshi Xiao, 2019. "Construction of Knowledge Graphs for Maritime Dangerous Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Ziwei Xiao & Chunxiao Zhang, 2021. "Construction of Meteorological Simulation Knowledge Graph Based on Deep Learning Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Malerba, Franco & Orsenigo, Luigi, 1996. "Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 451-478, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danling Yuan & Keping Zhou & Chun Yang, 2023. "Architecture and Application of Traffic Safety Management Knowledge Graph Based on Neo4j," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Wenling Liu & Yuexiang Yang & Xinyu Tu & Wan Wang, 2022. "ERSDMM: A Standard Digitalization Modeling Method for Emergency Response Based on Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Akeem Pedro & Anh-Tuan Pham-Hang & Phong Thanh Nguyen & Hai Chien Pham, 2022. "Data-Driven Construction Safety Information Sharing System Based on Linked Data, Ontologies, and Knowledge Graph Technologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenling Liu & Yuexiang Yang & Xinyu Tu & Wan Wang, 2022. "ERSDMM: A Standard Digitalization Modeling Method for Emergency Response Based on Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Qi He & Chenyang Yu & Wei Song & Xiaoyi Jiang & Lili Song & Jian Wang, 2023. "ISLKG: The Construction of Island Knowledge Graph and Knowledge Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Qi Zhang & Yuanqiao Wen & Chunhui Zhou & Hai Long & Dong Han & Fan Zhang & Changshi Xiao, 2019. "Construction of Knowledge Graphs for Maritime Dangerous Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Michael Peneder, 2003. "Industry Classifications: Aim, Scope and Techniques," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 109-129, March.
    5. Laihao Ma & Xiaoxue Ma & Jingwen Zhang & Qing Yang & Kai Wei, 2021. "Identifying the Weaker Function Links in the Hazardous Chemicals Road Transportation System in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Andrej David & Peter Mako & Jan Lizbetin & Patrik Bohm, 2021. "The Impact of an Environmental Way of Customer’s Thinking on a Range of Choice from Transport Routes in Maritime Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Consoli, Davide & Elche-Hortelano, Dioni, 2010. "Variety in the knowledge base of Knowledge Intensive Business Services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1303-1310, December.
    8. Montresor, Sandro & Vezzani, Antonio, 2015. "The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 381-393.
    9. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2018. "Barriers to innovation in young and mature firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 181-206, January.
    10. Terranova, Roberta & Turco, Enrico M., 2022. "Concentration, stagnation and inequality: An agent-based approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 569-595.
    11. Fulvio Castellacci, 2007. "Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth ," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(6), pages 1105-1145, December.
    12. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Marsili, Orietta, 2006. "The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 213-229, March.
    13. Chatzistamoulou, Nikos & Kounetas, Kostas & Tsekouras, Kostas, 2022. "Technological hierarchies and learning: Spillovers, complexity, relatedness, and the moderating role of absorptive capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Natália Barbosa, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and exporting performance:Firm-level evidence from Portugal," GEE Papers 183, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Sep 2024.
    15. Melissa Haller & David L. Rigby, 2020. "The geographic evolution of optics technologies in the United States, 1976–2010," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    16. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson, 2024. "To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 104-140, January.
    17. Epicoco, Marianna, 2016. "Patterns of innovation and organizational demography in emerging sustainable fields: An analysis of the chemical sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 427-441.
    18. Gabriele Pellegrino & Mariacristina Piva & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "How do new entrepreneurs innovate?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 42(3), pages 323-341, September.
    19. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Paola Giuri, 2000. "Industry Life Cycle and the Evolution of an Industry Network," LEM Papers Series 2000/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Albert Faber & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 08-15, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Apr 2008.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10692-:d:654316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.