IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9230-d627343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health and Protective Measures for Seniors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Opinion of Polish Society

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Podhorecka

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Toruń, Poland)

  • Anna Pyszora

    (Department of Palliative Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Toruń, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Woźniewicz

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Toruń, Poland)

  • Jakub Husejko

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Toruń, Poland)

  • Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska

    (Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Toruń, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the opinion of society on the individual care and protection measures towards seniors during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the relationship of opinions with demographic data, knowledge about aging and own experience in contacts with the elderly was examined. The study involved 923 attendees from Poland. The tools used to assess the research problem were: demographic characteristics, a Facts on Aging Quiz (FAQ), the author’s questionnaire about preventive and protective measures for seniors during the COVID-19 pandemic. We observed that over 50% of participants were against designating shopping hours for seniors. The analysis showed that negative attitudes were more often expressed by women than by men; younger people and those declaring that they do not spend too much time with the elderly. In the matter of vaccination priority for the elderly, over 70% participants replied “rather yes” or “definitely yes”. The use of the age criterion in situations of limited access to medications and ventilators was supported mainly by learners, with high results of the FAQ, and professionals dealing with seniors. Finally, almost 56% of participants declared that their contacts with seniors were the same as before the pandemic, while merely 1.6% indicated that they avoid contact with them entirely.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Podhorecka & Anna Pyszora & Agnieszka Woźniewicz & Jakub Husejko & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska, 2021. "Health and Protective Measures for Seniors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Opinion of Polish Society," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9230-:d:627343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liat Ayalon & Alison Chasteen & Manfred Diehl & Becca R Levy & Shevaun D Neupert & Klaus Rothermund & Clemens Tesch-Römer & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2021. "Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(2), pages 49-52.
    2. Sibila Marques & João Mariano & Joana Mendonça & Wouter De Tavernier & Moritz Hess & Laura Naegele & Filomena Peixeiro & Daniel Martins, 2020. "Determinants of Ageism against Older Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mo Hu & Zhiyuan Hao & Yinrui Yin, 2022. "Promoting the Integration of Elderly Healthcare and Elderly Nursing: Evidence from the Chinese Government," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Emilio Paolo Visintin & Alessandra Tasso, 2022. "Are You Willing to Protect the Health of Older People? Intergenerational Contact and Ageism as Predictors of Attitudes toward the COVID-19 Vaccination Passport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alison L. Chasteen & Sali A. Tagliamonte & Katharina Pabst & Samantha Brunet, 2022. "Ageist Communication Experienced by Middle-Aged and Older Canadians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Johanna Cresswell-Smith & Kristian Wahlbeck & Jorid Kalseth, 2022. "Life Conditions as Mediators of Welfare State Effect on Mental Wellbeing among Oldest Old in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Keisuke Kokubun, 2024. "Relationships between six cultural scales and ten ageism dimensions: Correlation analysis using data from 31 countries," Papers 2408.04781, arXiv.org.
    4. Anna Sofia Bratt & Ann-Christine Petersson Hjelm & Matilda Wurm & Richard Huntley & Yoshihisa Hirakawa & Tsukasa Muraya, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research Literature and a Thematic Synthesis of Older LGBTQ People’s Experiences of Quality of Life, Minority Joy, Resilience, Minority Stress, Discrimination, and S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Justyna Wiktorowicz & Izabela Warwas & Dariusz Turek & Iwa Kuchciak, 2022. "Does generativity matter? A meta-analysis on individual work outcomes," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 977-995, December.
    6. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Heather Brown & Kate Reid, 2021. "Navigating Infodemics, Unlocking Social Capital and Maintaining Food Security during the COVID-19 First Wave in the UK: Older Adults’ Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. David Gold & Stuart Hughes & David Thomas, 2021. "Perceptions, experiences and opportunities for occupational safety and health professionals arising out of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Anna Schlomann & Mareike Bünning & Lena Hipp & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2022. "Aging during COVID-19 in Germany: a longitudinal analysis of psychosocial adaptation," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1077-1086, December.
    10. Ryszard J. Koziel & Jack C. Friedrich & Cort W. Rudolph & Hannes Zacher, 2021. "Age-Differentiated Leadership and Healthy Aging at Work: Evidence from the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Emilio Paolo Visintin & Alessandra Tasso, 2022. "Are You Willing to Protect the Health of Older People? Intergenerational Contact and Ageism as Predictors of Attitudes toward the COVID-19 Vaccination Passport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Stefania Pascut & Susanna Feruglio & Cristiano Crescentini & Alessio Matiz, 2022. "Predictive Factors of Anxiety, Depression, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling and Institutionalized Elderly during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Vânia de la Fuente-Núñez & Ella Cohn-Schwartz & Senjooti Roy & Liat Ayalon, 2021. "Scoping Review on Ageism against Younger Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-24, April.
    14. van Hoof, Joost & van Staalduinen, Willeke H. & Dikken, Jeroen, 2024. "A multi-year quantitative study of the experienced age-friendliness in The Hague: A tale of four personas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    15. Fu, Mingqi & Guo, Jing & Chen, Xi & Han, Boxun & Ahmed, Farooq & Shahid, Muhammad & Zhang, Qilin, 2022. "American Older Adults in the Time of COVID-19: Vulnerability Types, Aging Attitudes, and Emotional Responses," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1054, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Ulrike Bechtold & Natalie Stauder & Martin Fieder, 2024. "Attitudes towards Technology: Insights on Rarely Discussed Influences on Older Adults’ Willingness to Adopt Active Assisted Living (AAL)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Marco Socci & Andrea Principi & Mirko Di Rosa & Sabrina Quattrini & Davide Lucantoni, 2023. "Motivations, Relationships, Health and Quality of Life of Older Volunteers in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Ella Cohn-Schwartz & Markus H. Schafer & Liat Ayalon, 2022. "Age integration in later life social networks and self-perceptions of aging: examining their reciprocal associations," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1145-1153, December.
    19. Lisa Hollis‐Sawyer, 2021. "Differential Treatment of Older Workers Due to COVID‐19 Accommodations: Potential Issues of Ageism and Age Discrimination," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 155-174, September.
    20. N. Keating, 2022. "A research framework for the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021–2030)," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-787, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9230-:d:627343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.