IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8384-d610511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress among Emergency Health Care Workers on Nuclear or Radiation Disaster: A Preliminary State Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois

    (Emergency Department, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

  • Vincent Roux

    (CNRS, LaPSCo, Université Clermont Auvergne, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

  • Bruno Pereira

    (Clinical Research and Innovation Direction, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

  • Mara Flannery

    (Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA)

  • Carole Pelissier

    (Service de Santé au Travail, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France. Univ Lyon 1, Univ St Etienne, 42005 Saint-Étienne, France)

  • Céline Occelli

    (CHU Nice, Emergency Department, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France)

  • Jeannot Schmidt

    (Emergency Department, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

  • Valentin Navel

    (Translational Approach to Epithelial Injury and Repair, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, INSERM, GReD., 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Ophthalmology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

  • Frédéric Dutheil

    (CNRS, LaPSCo, Université Clermont Auvergne, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Occupational and Environmental Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, WittyFit, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France)

Abstract

Background: The nuclear or radiation disaster risk within the French Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes state is low (but not absent) due to its proximity to four Nuclear Power Generation Centers and two regional cancer control centers. This study aims to compare subjective stress ratings for emergency health care workers regarding nuclear and radiation disasters between two locations: at work versus at home. Materials and Methods: We distributed an anonymous online questionnaire via RedCap ® to all emergency health care workers who could be involved in patient care after a nuclear or radiation disaster. It comprised 18 questions divided into three parts—theoretical knowledge and practical assessment, stress assessment, and sociodemographic criteria. Results: We analyzed 107 responses. There was a significant 11-point increase in stress levels between work and home regarding nuclear or radiation disaster risks ( p = 0.01). Less than 25% of emergency health care workers surveyed benefited from annual training. Conclusion: The stress levels of emergency health care workers regarding nuclear or radiation disaster were higher at work than at home and increased without annual training. It is important to increase knowledge about these protocols and to mandate yearly training for all workers potentially involved in these disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois & Vincent Roux & Bruno Pereira & Mara Flannery & Carole Pelissier & Céline Occelli & Jeannot Schmidt & Valentin Navel & Frédéric Dutheil, 2021. "Stress among Emergency Health Care Workers on Nuclear or Radiation Disaster: A Preliminary State Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-9, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8384-:d:610511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frédéric Dutheil & Bruno Pereira & Farès Moustafa & Geraldine Naughton & François-Xavier Lesage & Céline Lambert, 2017. "At-risk and intervention thresholds of occupational stress using a visual analogue scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Beatriz Crespo-Ruiz & Shai Rivas-Galan & Cristina Fernandez-Vega & Carmen Crespo-Ruiz & Luis Maicas-Perez, 2018. "Executive Stress Management: Physiological Load of Stress and Recovery in Executives on Workdays," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois & Marion Trousselard & Bruno Pereira & Jeannot Schmidt & Maelys Clinchamps & David Thivel & Ukadike Chris Ugbolue & Farès Moustafa & Céline Occelli & Guillaume Vallet & F, 2021. "Protocol of the Study on Emergency Health Care Workers’ Responses Evaluated by Karasek Questionnaire: The SEEK-Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Hayashi, Masatsugu & Hughes, Larry, 2013. "The policy responses to the Fukushima nuclear accident and their effect on Japanese energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 86-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rémi Colin-Chevalier & Bruno Pereira & Amanda Clare Benson & Samuel Dewavrin & Thomas Cornet & Frédéric Dutheil, 2022. "The Protective Role of Job Control/Autonomy on Mental Strain of Managers: A Cross-Sectional Study among Wittyfit’s Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Lam, J. & Cheung, L. & Han, Y. & Wang, S., 2018. "China’s Response to Nuclear Safety Post-Fukushima: Genuine or Rhetoric?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1866, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Ruixiaoxiao Zhang & Geoffrey QP Shen & Meng Ni & Johnny Wong, 2020. "The relationship between energy consumption and gross domestic product in Hong Kong (1992–2015): Evidence from sectoral analysis and implications on future energy policy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 215-236, March.
    4. HaeRan Shin, 2017. "Risk politics and the pro-nuclear growth coalition in Japan in relation to the Fukushima," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(4), pages 518-529, June.
    5. Li, Aitong & Xu, Yuan & Shiroyama, Hideaki, 2019. "Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Natasha Li & Sarah R. Martin & Theodore W. Heyming & Chloe Knudsen-Robbins & Terence Sanger & Zeev N. Kain, 2022. "Recurrent SARS-CoV-2 Serology Testing and Pandemic Anxiety: A Study of Pediatric Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, August.
    7. Maria Marin-Farrona & Manuel Leon-Jimenez & Jorge Garcia-Unanue & Leonor Gallardo & Carmen Crespo-Ruiz & Beatriz Crespo-Ruiz, 2020. "Transtheoretical Model Is Better Predictor of Physiological Stress than Perceived Stress Scale and Work Ability Index among Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Niematallah Elamin & Mototsugu Fukushige, 2017. "The 2011 Japanese energy crisis: Effects on the magnitude and pattern of load demand," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 17-19, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    9. Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna, 2014. "Measuring the impact of nuclear accidents on energy policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 121-129.
    10. Zhu, Bo & Deng, Yuanyue & Hu, Xin, 2023. "Global energy security: Do internal and external risk spillovers matter? A multilayer network method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Heshmati, Almas & Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Sun, Kai, 2014. "Estimation of productivity in Korean electric power plants: A semiparametric smooth coefficient model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 491-500.
    12. Hsiao, Cody Yu-Ling & Chen, Hsing Hung, 2018. "The contagious effects on economic development after resuming construction policy for nuclear power plants in Coastal China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 291-302.
    13. Richter, Philipp M. & Holz, Franziska, 2015. "All quiet on the eastern front? Disruption scenarios of Russian natural gas supply to Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 177-189.
    14. Zimmermann, Florian & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "State or market: Investments in new nuclear power plants in France and their domestic and cross-border effects," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 64, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    15. Contu, Davide & Strazzera, Elisabetta, 2022. "Testing for saliency-led choice behavior in discrete choice modeling: An application in the context of preferences towards nuclear energy in Italy," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    16. Contu, Davide & Strazzera, Elisabetta & Mourato, Susana, 2016. "Modeling individual preferences for energy sources: The case of IV generation nuclear energy in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 37-58.
    17. Ikegami, Masako & Wang, Zijian, 2016. "The long-run causal relationship between electricity consumption and real GDP: Evidence from Japan and Germany," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 767-784.
    18. Honma, Satoshi & Ushifusa, Yoshiaki & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Okamura, Soyoka & Vandercammee, Lilu, 2024. "Environmental efficiency of Japanese regions before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake," MPRA Paper 120945, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Nachatter Singh Garha & Ricardo Garcia Mira & Fernando González-Laxe, 2022. "Energy Transition Narratives in Spain: A Case Study of As Pontes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Woo, C.K. & Ho, T. & Zarnikau, J. & Olson, A. & Jones, R. & Chait, M. & Horowitz, I. & Wang, J., 2014. "Electricity-market price and nuclear power plant shutdown: Evidence from California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 234-244.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8384-:d:610511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.