IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6246-d571849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Capability Assessment for Diet and Activity (CADA) Questionnaire in Saudi University Employed Women

Author

Listed:
  • Jwaher Haji Alhaji

    (Department of Health Sciences, College of Applied Studies and Community Service, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. BOX 145111 ZIP 4545, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ghareeb O. Alshuwaier

    (Department of Exercise Physiology, College of Sport Sciences and Physical Activity, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. BOX 145111 ZIP 4545, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nouf Sahal Alharbi

    (Department of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. BOX 145111 ZIP 4545, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulrahman I. Alaqil

    (Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa P.O. BOX 31982 ZIP 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nora Majed BinSultan

    (Department of English Language and Translation, College of Languages and Translation, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. BOX 145111 ZIP 4545, Saudi Arabia)

  • Wadi B. Alonazi

    (Department of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. BOX 145111 ZIP 4545, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background: The Capability Assessment for Diet and Activity (CADA) is a questionnaire that was developed in English and designed to measure the practical barriers and opportunities for diet and physical activity. Objective: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the CADA questionnaire for the Arabic context in a sample of Saudi women employed at a university. Methods: The CADA was translated into Arabic using the forward and backward translation process. The Arabic version was then validated with a sample of 125 female Saudi participants. In order to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic version, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was assessed, and a principal component analysis was performed. Results: The translated CADA had good psychometric quality. The content validity analysis revealed a representativeness score of 99.3% and a degree of clarity of 98.6%, indicating excellent compatibility. The principal component analysis showed a single-factor structure. Conclusions: The Arabic version of the CADA questionnaire is now available to assess opportunities to achieve a healthy diet and physical activity level as part of health behavior management, which can lead to more effective interventions for improving people’s health in Arabic-speaking countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jwaher Haji Alhaji & Ghareeb O. Alshuwaier & Nouf Sahal Alharbi & Abdulrahman I. Alaqil & Nora Majed BinSultan & Wadi B. Alonazi, 2021. "Translation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Capability Assessment for Diet and Activity (CADA) Questionnaire in Saudi University Employed Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-9, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6246-:d:571849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aggarwal, A. & Cook, A.J. & Jiao, J. & Seguin, R.A. & Moudon, A.V. & Hurvitz, P.M. & Drewnowski, A., 2014. "Access to supermarkets and fruit and vegetable consumption," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(5), pages 917-923.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catalina Cruz-Piedrahita & Francisco-Javier Martinez-Carranza & Maria Mar Delgado-Serrano, 2024. "A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding Food Deserts in Vulnerable Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Rudkin, Simon, 2015. "Supermarket Interventions and Diet in areas of Limited Retail Access: Policy Suggestions from the Seacroft Intervention Study," MPRA Paper 62434, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Pemjean, Isabel & Hernández, Paula & Mediano, Fernanda & Corvalán, Camila, 2024. "How are intra-household dynamics, gender roles and time availability related to food access and children's diet quality during the Covid-19 lockdown?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    4. Katarzyna Mazur-Włodarczyk & Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska, 2022. "Conventional or Organic? Motives and Trends in Polish Vegetable Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. David Frisvold & Joseph Price, 2019. "The Contribution of the School Environment to the Overall Food Environment Experienced by Children," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(1), pages 106-123, July.
    6. Miwa Yamaguchi & Katsuya Takahashi & Masamichi Hanazato & Norimichi Suzuki & Katsunori Kondo & Naoki Kondo, 2019. "Comparison of Objective and Perceived Access to Food Stores Associated with Intake Frequencies of Vegetables/Fruits and Meat/Fish among Community-Dwelling Older Japanese," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Gregory S. Macfarlane & Emma Stucki & Alisha H. Redelfs & Lori Andersen Spruance, 2022. "Beyond Proximity: Utility-Based Access from Location-Based Services Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Kristen Cooksey Stowers & Qianxia Jiang & Abiodun T. Atoloye & Sean Lucan & Kim Gans, 2020. "Racial Differences in Perceived Food Swamp and Food Desert Exposure and Disparities in Self-Reported Dietary Habits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Xiaowei Cai & Richard Volpe & Christiane Schroeter & Lisa Mancino, 2018. "Food retail market structure and produce purchases in the United States," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 756-770, October.
    10. Yasamin Shaker & Sara E. Grineski & Timothy W. Collins & Aaron B. Flores, 2023. "Redlining, racism and food access in US urban cores," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 101-112, March.
    11. Freire, Tiago & Rudkin, Simon, 2019. "Healthy food diversity and supermarket interventions: Evidence from the Seacroft Intervention Study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 125-138.
    12. Taiyang Zhong & Zhenzhong Si & Jonathan Crush & Zhiying Xu & Xianjin Huang & Steffanie Scott & Shuangshuang Tang & Xiang Zhang, 2018. "The Impact of Proximity to Wet Markets and Supermarkets on Household Dietary Diversity in Nanjing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Everitt, Haley & van der Werf, Paul & Seabrook, Jamie A. & Wray, Alexander & Gilliland, Jason A., 2022. "The quantity and composition of household food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic: A direct measurement study in Canada," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    14. Paul van der Werf & Kristian Larsen & Jamie A. Seabrook & Jason Gilliland, 2020. "How Neighbourhood Food Environments and a Pay-as-You-Throw (PAYT) Waste Program Impact Household Food Waste Disposal in the City of Toronto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Haoyang Ping & Zhuocheng Li & Xizhu Shen & Haizhen Sun, 2024. "Optimization of Vegetable Restocking and Pricing Strategies for Innovating Supermarket Operations Utilizing a Combination of ARIMA, LSTM, and FP-Growth Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Jiao, Junfeng & Azimian, Amin, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to grocery stores using radiation model and survival analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Mohammad Javad Koohsari & Andrew T. Kaczynski & Tomoya Hanibuchi & Ai Shibata & Kaori Ishii & Akitomo Yasunaga & Tomoki Nakaya & Koichiro Oka, 2018. "Physical Activity Environment and Japanese Adults’ Body Mass Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, March.
    18. Gwen M Chodur & Ye Shen & Stephen Kodish & Vanessa M Oddo & Daniel A Antiporta & Brittany Jock & Jessica C Jones-Smith, 2016. "Food Environments around American Indian Reservations: A Mixed Methods Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Jackie Yenerall & Wen You & Jennie Hill, 2017. "Investigating the Spatial Dimension of Food Access," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Alessandro Bonanno & Francesco Bimbo & Elena Castellari & Paolo Sckokai, 2017. "Five-a-Day, Fruit and Vegetables Portions, and the Food Environment: The Italian Case," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(4), pages 682-709.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6246-:d:571849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.