IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i7p2541-d342708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) in China: Evidence from Citywide Representative Surveys from Five Chinese Cities in 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Jidong Huang

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Zongshuan Duan

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Yu Wang

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Pamela B. Redmon

    (Global Health Institutes, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Michael P. Eriksen

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

Abstract

China is the largest cigarette consuming country in the world. The emergence of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in China may have important implications for the Chinese tobacco market. Unfortunately, research on ENDS in China, while growing, is still limited. This study was designed to examine the awareness and use of ENDS among adult urban residents in China. Data from five citywide representative surveys conducted in 2017–2018 were used. Percentages of residents who had ever heard of, ever used, or used ENDS in the past 30 days among all residents and smokers were estimated, in total and by demographic characteristics. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted associations between awareness and use of ENDS and individual-level demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES). Overall, 51.3% had ever heard, 4.8% ever used, and 0.9% used ENDS in the past 30 days. Men, young adults, those with high levels of education, and current smokers were more likely to be aware of and use ENDS. Among smokers, 67.8% had ever heard, 17.1% ever used, and 3.9% used ENDS in the past 30 days, respectively. Young adult smokers and smokers with high levels of education were more likely to be aware of and use ENDS. Our study results on ENDS awareness and use patterns and associated factors in China provide important evidence to inform research and policies related to ENDS manufacture, marketing, and sales in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jidong Huang & Zongshuan Duan & Yu Wang & Pamela B. Redmon & Michael P. Eriksen, 2020. "Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) in China: Evidence from Citywide Representative Surveys from Five Chinese Cities in 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2541-:d:342708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nigar Nargis & Rong Zheng & Steve S. Xu & Geoffrey T. Fong & Guoze Feng & Yuan Jiang & Yang Wang & Xiao Hu, 2019. "Cigarette Affordability in China, 2006–2015: Findings from International Tobacco Control China Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Xiao Hu & Yang Wang & Jidong Huang & Rong Zheng, 2019. "Cigarette Affordability and Cigarette Consumption among Adult and Elderly Chinese Smokers: Evidence from A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    3. S. Khoudigian & T. Devji & L. Lytvyn & K. Campbell & R. Hopkins & D. O’Reilly, 2016. "The efficacy and short-term effects of electronic cigarettes as a method for smoking cessation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(2), pages 257-267, March.
    4. Muhammad Aziz Rahman & Nicholas Hann & Andrew Wilson & George Mnatzaganian & Linda Worrall-Carter, 2015. "E-Cigarettes and Smoking Cessation: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Socrates Yong-da Wu & Man Ping Wang & William H. Li & Antonio C. Kwong & Vienna W. Lai & Tai Hing Lam, 2018. "Does Electronic Cigarette Use Predict Abstinence from Conventional Cigarettes among Smokers in Hong Kong?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Nino Künzli & Milo A. Puhan & L. Suzanne Suggs, 2019. "Will the Swiss pavilion at Expo 2020 Dubai damage your health?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(8), pages 1125-1126, November.
    3. Reny Yuliati & Billy Koernianti Sarwono & Abdillah Ahsan & I Gusti Lanang Agung Kharisma Wibhisono & Dian Kusuma, 2021. "Effect of Message Approach and Image Size on Pictorial Health Warning Effectiveness on Cigarette Pack in Indonesia: A Mixed Factorial Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Jose Angelo Divino & Philipp Ehrl & Osvaldo Candido & Marcos Aurelio Pereira Valadao, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of a Tobacco Tax Reform on the Industry Price-Setting Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Ahmed M. Al Rajeh & Ilias Mahmud & Mahmudul Hassan Al Imam & Muhammad Aziz Rahman & Fariss Al Shehri & Salman Alomayrin & Nawaf Alfazae & Yousif Mohammed Elmosaad & Ibrahim Alasqah, 2022. "E-Cigarette Use among Male Smokers in Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Xiao Hu & Yang Wang & Jidong Huang & Rong Zheng, 2019. "Cigarette Affordability and Cigarette Consumption among Adult and Elderly Chinese Smokers: Evidence from A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Olatokunbo Osibogun & Zoran Bursac & Martin Mckee & Tan Li & Wasim Maziak, 2020. "Cessation outcomes in adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes: the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health cohort study, USA, 2013–2016," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(6), pages 923-936, July.
    8. Khishigsuren Davagdorj & Van Huy Pham & Nipon Theera-Umpon & Keun Ho Ryu, 2020. "XGBoost-Based Framework for Smoking-Induced Noncommunicable Disease Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Tomoyasu Hirano & Takahiro Tabuchi & Rika Nakahara & Naoki Kunugita & Yumiko Mochizuki-Kobayashi, 2017. "Electronic Cigarette Use and Smoking Abstinence in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study of Quitting Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Pete Driezen & Nigar Nargis & Mary E. Thompson & K. Michael Cummings & Geoffrey T. Fong & Frank J. Chaloupka & Ce Shang & Kai-Wen Cheng, 2019. "State-Level Affordability of Factory-Made Cigarettes among Current US Smokers: Findings from the ITC US Survey, 2003–2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Kim AGJ Romijnders & Erna JZ Krüsemann & Sanne Boesveldt & Kees de Graaf & Hein de Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2019. "E-Liquid Flavor Preferences and Individual Factors Related to Vaping: A Survey among Dutch Never-Users, Smokers, Dual Users, and Exclusive Vapers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Su Hyun Park & Lily Lee & Jenni A Shearston & Michael Weitzman, 2017. "Patterns of electronic cigarette use and level of psychological distress," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Adele Caldarelli & Rosanna Span? & Luca Ferri & Raffaela Casciello, 2020. "L?accounting change nel settore pubblico: primi spunti per una riflessione integrata," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(1), pages 11-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2541-:d:342708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.