IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1442-d324323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Extension of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Hesitant Fuzzy Sets to Assess the Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jalil Heidary Dahooie

    (Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran)

  • Amir Salar Vanaki

    (Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran)

  • Hamid Reza Firoozfar

    (Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran)

  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

    (Institute of Sustainable Construction, Laboratory of Operational Research, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio av. 11, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania)

  • Audrius Čereška

    (Department of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Basanaviciaus str. 28, LT-03324 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The construction industry is considered as one of the most dangerous industries in terms of occupational safety and has a high rate of occupational incidents and risks compared to other industries. Given the importance of identifying and assessing the occupational hazards in this industry, researchers have conducted numerous studies using statistical methods, multi-criteria decision-making methods, expert-based judgments, and so on. Although, these researchers have used linguistic variables, fuzzy sets and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets to overcome challenges such as uncertainty and ambiguity in the risk assessment conducted by experts; the previous models lack in efficiency if the experts are hesitant in their assessment. This leads to the inability to assign a specific membership degree to any risk. Therefore, in this research, it is tried to provide an improved approach to the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method using an Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method based on the hesitant fuzzy set, which can effectively cope with the hesitance of the experts in the evaluation. Also, Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method is applied for risk factor weighing in the proposed approach. This model is applied to a construction industry case study to solve a realistic occupational risk assessment. Moreover, a comparison is made between the results of this model and those obtained by the conventional FMEA and some other aggregation operators. The results indicate that the newly developed approach is useful and flexible to address complex FMEA problems and can generate logical and reliable priority rankings for failure modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Amir Salar Vanaki & Hamid Reza Firoozfar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Audrius Čereška, 2020. "An Extension of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Hesitant Fuzzy Sets to Assess the Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1442-:d:324323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan-juan Peng & Jian-qiang Wang & Xiao-hui Wu & Hong-yu Zhang & Xiao-hong Chen, 2015. "The fuzzy cross-entropy for intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(13), pages 2335-2350, October.
    2. Song-Man Wu & Hu-Chen Liu & Li-En Wang, 2017. "Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4436-4449, August.
    3. Huang, Jia & Li, Zhaojun(Steven) & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 302-309.
    4. Arash Geramian & Ajith Abraham & Mojtaba Ahmadi Nozari, 2019. "Fuzzy logic-based FMEA robust design: a quantitative approach for robustness against groupthink in group/team decision-making," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1331-1344, March.
    5. Sang-Bing Tsai & Jie Zhou & Yang Gao & Jiangtao Wang & Guodong Li & Yuxiang Zheng & Peng Ren & Wei Xu, 2017. "Combining FMEA with DEMATEL models to solve production process problems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Hu-Chen Liu & Jian-Xin You & Shouming Chen & Yi-Zeng Chen, 2016. "An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1027-1042, November.
    7. Seyed-Hosseini, S.M. & Safaei, N. & Asgharpour, M.J., 2006. "Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(8), pages 872-881.
    8. Sukran Seker & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2017. "Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Analyzing Occupational Risks on Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. B Zhu & Z S Xu, 2013. "Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(12), pages 1831-1840, December.
    10. A. V. Thomas & Satyanarayana Kalidindi & L. S. Ganesh, 2006. "Modelling and assessment of critical risks in BOT road projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 407-424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    2. Sahin, Aleyna & Imamoglu, Gul & Murat, Mirac & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2024. "A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Salvador Garcia-Ayllon & Eloy Hontoria & Nolberto Munier, 2021. "The Contribution of MCDM to SUMP: The Case of Spanish Cities during 2006–2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Jia, Yuning & Song, Wenyan, 2021. "A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Huang, Jia & You, Jian-Xin & Liu, Hu-Chen & Song, Ming-Shun, 2020. "Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Jianghong Zhu & Bin Shuai & Rui Wang & Kwai-Sang Chin, 2019. "Risk Assessment for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using the Bonferroni Mean and TODIM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Chao Song & Jian-Qiang Wang & Jun-Bo Li, 2020. "New Framework for Quality Function Deployment Using Linguistic Z-Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Faghih-Roohi, Shahrzad & Akcay, Alp & Zhang, Yingqian & Shekarian, Ehsan & de Jong, Eelco, 2020. "A group risk assessment approach for the selection of pharmaceutical product shipping lanes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Zhen Wang & Rongxi Wang & Wei Deng & Yong Zhao, 2022. "An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Xiao, Jing & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2021. "Consensus and opinion evolution-based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Liu, Hu-Chen & Li, Zhaojun & Zhang, Jian-Qing & You, Xiao-Yue, 2018. "A large group decision making approach for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 135-144.
    10. Li, Ying & Liu, Peide & Li, Gang, 2023. "An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Feifei Jin & Chang Li & Jinpei Liu & Ligang Zhou, 2021. "Distribution Linguistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making Based on Consistency and Consensus Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Shuli Liu & Xinwang Liu, 2016. "A Sample Survey Based Linguistic MADM Method with Prospect Theory for Online Shopping Problems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 749-774, July.
    13. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    14. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Failure mode and effect analysis considering the fairness-oriented consensus of a large group with core-periphery structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Certa, Antonella & Hopps, Fabrizio & Inghilleri, Roberta & La Fata, Concetta Manuela, 2017. "A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 69-79.
    16. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Song, Wenyan, 2022. "Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: A method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 456-470.
    18. Sheng Liu & Xiaojie Guo & Lanyong Zhang, 2019. "An Improved Assessment Method for FMEA for a Shipboard Integrated Electric Propulsion System Using Fuzzy Logic and DEMATEL Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Binay Prakash Pandey & Devi Prasad Mishra, 2023. "Developing an Alternate Mineral Transportation System by Evaluating Risk of Truck Accidents in the Mining Industry—A Critical Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Myeongji Oh & Hyejin Jang & Sunhye Kim & Byungun Yoon, 2023. "Main path analysis for technological development using SAO structure and DEMATEL based on keyword causality," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2079-2104, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1442-:d:324323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.