IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v92y2024ics0038012124000119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Sahin, Aleyna
  • Imamoglu, Gul
  • Murat, Mirac
  • Ayyildiz, Ertugrul

Abstract

Service quality in universities significantly impacts student satisfaction, enrollment, and institutional reputation. This study presents a comprehensive methodology for evaluating university service quality by integrating political, economic, social, technological, and environmental (PESTE) factors with sub-criteria aligned with the dimensions of service quality (SERVQUAL): tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The primary objective of this study is to establish a robust evaluation framework that considers both internal and external factors. Initially, a hierarchy of criteria is constructed based on PESTE factors, providing a holistic view of university service quality. Subsequently, sub-criteria are identified within each PESTE factor to correspond to the SERVQUAL dimensions. To address the inherent ambiguity in expert opinions, this study introduces a novel Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Simple Additive Weighted Ratio Assessment (IVN-SWARA) method for criteria and sub-criteria weighting. The Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Complex Proportional Assessment with Distance from Average Solution (IVN-CODAS) method is employed to rank universities based on service quality. This methodology is applied to evaluate eight Turkish universities, revealing the multifaceted nature of service quality. Notably, competent academic staff, robust technological infrastructure, and vibrant social activities emerged as key contributors. These findings emphasize the effectiveness of the integrated PESTE-SERVQUAL framework in assessing university service quality and offering recommendations. By introducing a novel holistic decision-making model, this study makes a significant methodological contribution to the evaluation of service quality in higher education. Policymakers and university administrators can leverage these insights to enhance their services, thus gaining a competitive edge.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahin, Aleyna & Imamoglu, Gul & Murat, Mirac & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2024. "A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124000119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ouissal GOUMAIRI & Es-Saâdia AOULA & Souad BEN SOUDA, 2020. "Application of the SERVQUAL Model for the Evaluation of the Service Quality in Moroccan Higher Education: Public Engineering School as a Case Study," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(5), pages 223-223, October.
    2. Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Mirac Murat & Gul Imamoglu & Yildiz Kose, 2023. "A novel hybrid MCDM approach to evaluate universities based on student perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 55-86, January.
    3. Montserrat Díaz-Méndez & Mario R. Paredes & Michael Saren, 2019. "Improving Society by Improving Education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the Role of Students in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Amir Salar Vanaki & Hamid Reza Firoozfar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Audrius Čereška, 2020. "An Extension of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Hesitant Fuzzy Sets to Assess the Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Ismail Hussein Amzat & Abdul Hakeem Alade Najimdeen & Lynne M. Walters & Byabazaire Yusuf & Nena Padilla-Valdez, 2023. "Determining Service Quality Indicators to Recruit and Retain International Students in Malaysia Higher Education Institutions: Global Issues and Local Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Xiaoya Wang & Yuanyang Gao & Sumei Li & Naeem Jan, 2022. "A Study on Students’ Satisfaction with Classroom Teaching of Independent Adult Universities Based on SERVQUAL and IPA Models, Taking Beijing Haidian Adult University as an Example," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-9, January.
    7. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    9. Yalcin Kavus, Bahar & Gulum Tas, Pelin & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul & Taskin, Alev, 2022. "A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Ali S. Gargoum, 2019. "Determinants of Student Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Case of the UAE University," International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management (IJCRMM), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 15-24, October.
    11. Nojavan, Majid & Heidari, Atefeh & Mohammaditabar, Davood, 2021. "A fuzzy service quality based approach for performance evaluation of educational units," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Kiran Pandey & Abbas Mardani & Justas Streimikis & Dalia Streimikiene & Melfi Alrasheedi, 2020. "Novel Multi-Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy SWARA–COPRAS Approach for Sustainability Evaluation of the Bioenergy Production Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Mehdi KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Zenonas TURSKIS & Jurgita ANTUCHEVICIENE, 2016. "A New Combinative Distance-Based Assessment(Codas) Method For Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(3), pages 25-44.
    14. Albana Berisha Qehaja & Enver Kutllovci & Justina Shiroka Pula, 2017. "Strategic Management Tools and Techniques Usage: a Qualitative Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 585-600.
    15. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Audrius Čereška & Jonas Matijošius & Alfredas Rimkus & Romualdas Bausys, 2019. "Internal Combustion Engine Analysis of Energy Ecological Parameters by Neutrosophic MULTIMOORA and SWARA Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    2. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Kavitha, S. & Satheeshkumar, J. & Amudha, T., 2024. "Multi-label feature selection using q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach extended to CODAS," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-173.
    5. Dorokhov, V.V. & Kuznetsov, G.V. & Vershinina, K.Yu. & Strizhak, P.A., 2021. "Relative energy efficiency indicators calculated for high-moisture waste-based fuel blends using multiple-criteria decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Ahmed, Fawad & Zhu, Shunmin & Yu, Guoyao & Luo, Ercang, 2022. "A potent numerical model coupled with multi-objective NSGA-II algorithm for the optimal design of Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Seyed Morteza Hatefi & Hamideh Asadi & Gholamreza Shams & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Zenonas Turskis, 2021. "Model for the Sustainable Material Selection by Applying Integrated Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Yurii Gutarevych & Vasyl Mateichyk & Jonas Matijošius & Alfredas Rimkus & Igor Gritsuk & Oleksander Syrota & Yevheniy Shuba, 2020. "Improving Fuel Economy of Spark Ignition Engines Applying the Combined Method of Power Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Ridha, Hussein Mohammed & Gomes, Chandima & Hizam, Hashim & Ahmadipour, Masoud & Heidari, Ali Asghar & Chen, Huiling, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods for optimal design of standalone photovoltaic system: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Mirac Murat & Gul Imamoglu & Yildiz Kose, 2023. "A novel hybrid MCDM approach to evaluate universities based on student perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 55-86, January.
    11. Mahmut Baydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2022. "Determining Objective Characteristics of MCDM Methods under Uncertainty: An Exploration Study with Financial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Dragan Pamučar & Ibrahim Badi & Korica Sanja & Radojko Obradović, 2018. "A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, September.
    13. He, Jun & Huang, Zilong & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Pier Paolo Miglietta, 2023. "A Novel Axial-Distance-Based Aggregated Measurement (ADAM) Method for the Evaluation of Agri-Food Circular-Economy-Based Business Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Sandro V. Soares & Giovana R. Smania & Carlos R. M. Lima & Thiago C. Soares & Clarissa C. Mussi, 2024. "Relationship between Student Expectations, Perceptions, and Personal Characteristics in Integrated Technical Courses," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 1-52, January.
    16. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Mehtab Alam & Fu-Ren Lin, 2022. "Internalizing Sustainability into Research Practices of Higher Education Institutions: Case of a Research University in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    18. Željko Stević & Dragan Pamučar & Marko Subotić & Jurgita Antuchevičiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2018. "The Location Selection for Roundabout Construction Using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS Approach Based on a New Rough Hamy Aggregator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, August.
    19. K. Koppiahraj & S. Bathrinath & V. G. Venkatesh & Venkatesh Mani & Yangyan Shi, 2023. "Optimal sustainability assessment method selection: a practitioner perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 629-662, May.
    20. Raslavičius, Laurencas & Felneris, Mantas & Pukalskas, Saugirdas & Rimkus, Alfredas & Melaika, Mindaugas, 2019. "Evaluation of P. moriformis oil and its blends with diesel fuel as promising contributors to transportation energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.