IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1247-d320909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses of Influenza Vaccination for Prisoners in Thailand: An Application of System Dynamic Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Rapeepong Suphanchaimat

    (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
    International Health Policy Program (IHPP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Pawinee Doung-ngern

    (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Kritchavat Ploddi

    (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Suthanun Suthachana

    (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Mathudara Phaiyarom

    (International Health Policy Program (IHPP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Kumaree Pachanee

    (International Health Policy Program (IHPP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Walairat Chaifoo

    (Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Sopon Iamsirithaworn

    (Division of Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

Abstract

Influenza outbreaks in Thai prisons were increasing in number every year and to address this, the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) initiated a policy to promote vaccination for prisoners. The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness and budget impact of the influenza vaccination policy for prisoners in Thailand. The study obtained data from the Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control (DDC), MOPH. Deterministic system dynamic modelling was exercised to estimate the financial implication of the vaccination programme in comparison with routine outbreak control. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated via a DDC perspective. The reproductive number was estimated at 1.4. A total of 143 prisons across the country (375,763 prisoners) were analysed. In non-vaccination circumstances, the total healthcare cost amounted to 174.8 million Baht (US$ 5.6 million). Should all prisoners be vaccinated, the total healthcare cost would reduce to 90.9 million Baht (US$ 2.9 million), and 46.8 million Baht (US$ 1.5 million) of this is related to the vaccination. The ICER of vaccination (compared with routine outbreak control) varied between 39,738.0 to 61,688.3 Baht per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted (US$ 1281.9–1989.9). Should the vaccination cover 30% of the prisoners, the ICER would be equal to 46,866.8 Baht (US$ 1511.8) per DALY averted with the budget burden amounted to Baht (US$ 4.8 million). The vaccination programme would become more cost-effective if the routine outbreak control was intensified. In summary, the vaccination programme was a cost-effective measure to halt influenza outbreak amongst prisoners. Further primary studies that aim to assess the actual impact of the programme are recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Rapeepong Suphanchaimat & Pawinee Doung-ngern & Kritchavat Ploddi & Suthanun Suthachana & Mathudara Phaiyarom & Kumaree Pachanee & Walairat Chaifoo & Sopon Iamsirithaworn, 2020. "Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses of Influenza Vaccination for Prisoners in Thailand: An Application of System Dynamic Modelling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1247-:d:320909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1247/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1247/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aronrag Meeyai & Naiyana Praditsitthikorn & Surachai Kotirum & Wantanee Kulpeng & Weerasak Putthasri & Ben S Cooper & Yot Teerawattananon, 2015. "Seasonal Influenza Vaccination for Children in Thailand: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    3. Maruschak, L.M. & Sabol, W.J. & Potter, R.H. & Reid, L.C. & Cramer, E.W., 2009. "Pandemic influenza and jail facilities and populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(S2), pages 339-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Susło & Piotr Pobrotyn & Lidia Brydak & Łukasz Rypicz & Urszula Grata-Borkowska & Jarosław Drobnik, 2021. "Seasonal Influenza and Low Flu Vaccination Coverage as Important Factors Modifying the Costs and Availability of Hospital Services in Poland: A Retrospective Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meimei Wang & Steffen Flessa, 2020. "Modelling Covid-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(5), pages 665-668, July.
    2. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    3. Erika Palmer, 2018. "The Heavy Cost of Care: Systemic Challenges in Norwegian Work Absenteeism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    5. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    6. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Daniel Chamberlain & Jessica Jacob & Sonia Wutzke, 2021. "A Systems Thinking Methodology for Studying Prevention Efforts in Communities," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 555-573, October.
    7. Zhe Zhao & Xin Xuan & Fan Zhang & Ying Cai & Xiaoyu Wang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Renewable Energy Development and Carbon Emission in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    9. Bidhan Bhuson Roy & Qingshi Tu, 2022. "A review of system dynamics modeling for the sustainability assessment of biorefineries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1450-1459, August.
    10. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    11. Elizabeth Bruch & Jon Atwell, 2015. "Agent-Based Models in Empirical Social Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(2), pages 186-221, May.
    12. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    13. Anaely Aguiar, 2020. "The role of systematic reviews in the system dynamics modelling process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 892-895, November.
    14. Karl M Rich & Matthew J Denwood & Alistair W Stott & Dominic J Mellor & Stuart W J Reid & George J Gunn, 2013. "Systems Approaches to Animal Disease Surveillance and Resource Allocation: Methodological Frameworks for Behavioral Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    15. Cristian Mahulea & Liliana Mahulea & Juan Manuel García Soriano & José Manuel Colom, 2018. "Modular Petri net modeling of healthcare systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 329-357, June.
    16. Neil S. Grigg, 2019. "Water–Health Nexus: Modeling the Pathways and Barriers to Water-Related Diseases," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(1), pages 319-335, January.
    17. Mahamoud, Aziza & Roche, Brenda & Homer, Jack, 2013. "Modelling the social determinants of health and simulating short-term and long-term intervention impacts for the city of Toronto, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 247-255.
    18. Tiago França Melo De Lima & Raquel Martins Lana & Tiago Garcia De Senna Carneiro & Cláudia Torres Codeço & Gabriel Souza Machado & Lucas Saraiva Ferreira & Líliam César De Castro Medeiros & Clodoveu A, 2016. "DengueME: A Tool for the Modeling and Simulation of Dengue Spatiotemporal Dynamics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Eduardo Tapia, 2022. "Groups' contribution to shaping ethnic residential segregation: a dynamic approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 565-589, May.
    20. Halia Melnyk & Gennaro Di Tosto & Jonathan Powell & Ashish R. Panchal & Ann Scheck McAlearney, 2023. "Conflict in the EMS Workforce: An Analysis of an Open-Ended Survey Question Reveals a Complex Assemblage of Stress, Burnout, and Pandemic-Related Factors Influencing Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1247-:d:320909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.