IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i24p9247-d459986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Pedestrian Street-Crossing Decision-Making Based on Vehicle Deceleration-Safety Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Hongjia Zhang

    (School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yingshi Guo

    (School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yunxing Chen

    (School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Qinyu Sun

    (School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Chang Wang

    (School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

Numerous traffic crashes occur every year on zebra crossings in China. Pedestrians are vulnerable road users who are usually injured severely or fatally during human-vehicle collisions. The development of an effective pedestrian street-crossing decision-making model is essential to improving pedestrian street-crossing safety. For this purpose, this paper carried out a naturalistic field experiment to collect a large number of vehicle and pedestrian motion data. Through interviewed with many pedestrians, it is found that they pay more attention to whether the driver can safely brake the vehicle before reaching the zebra crossing. Therefore, this work established a novel decision-making model based on the vehicle deceleration-safety gap (VD-SGM). The deceleration threshold of VD-SGM was determined based on signal detection theory (SDT). To verify the performance of VD-SGM proposed in this work, the model was compared with the Raff model. The results show that the VD-SGM performs better and the false alarm rate is lower. The VD-SGM proposed in this work is of great significance to improve pedestrians’ safety. Meanwhile, the model can also increase the efficiency of autonomous vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongjia Zhang & Yingshi Guo & Yunxing Chen & Qinyu Sun & Chang Wang, 2020. "Analysis of Pedestrian Street-Crossing Decision-Making Based on Vehicle Deceleration-Safety Gap," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9247-:d:459986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9247/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9247/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hughes, R.L., 2000. "The flow of large crowds of pedestrians," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 367-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziyu Chen & Xiufeng Chen & Ruicong Wang & Mengyuan Gao, 2022. "Characterization of Pedestrian Crossing Spatial Violations and Safety Impact Analysis in Advance Right-Turn Lane," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinghong Wang & Siuming Lo & Qingsong Wang & Jinhua Sun & Honglin Mu, 2013. "Risk of Large‐Scale Evacuation Based on the Effectiveness of Rescue Strategies Under Different Crowd Densities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1553-1563, August.
    2. Milad Haghani & Majid Sarvi & Zahra Shahhoseini & Maik Boltes, 2016. "How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans’ Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    4. Zhang, J. & Seyfried, A., 2014. "Comparison of intersecting pedestrian flows based on experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 316-325.
    5. Reppas, Andreas I. & Spiliotis, Konstantinos & Siettos, Constantinos I., 2015. "Tuning the average path length of complex networks and its influence to the emergent dynamics of the majority-rule model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 186-196.
    6. He, Mengchen & Wang, Qiao & Chen, Juan & Xu, Shiwei & Ma, Jian, 2023. "Modeling pedestrian walking behavior in the flow field with moving walkways," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 619(C).
    7. Zhang, Yijing & Lu, Linjun & Liu, Qiujia & Hu, Miaoqing, 2023. "Modeling of low-risk behavior of pedestrian movement based on dynamic data analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Li, Xiao-Yang & Lin, Zhi-Yang & Zhang, Peng & Zhang, Xiao-Ning, 2023. "Reconstruction of density and cost potential field of Eikonal equation: Applications to discrete pedestrian flow models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 629(C).
    9. Subaih, Rudina & Tordeux, Antoine, 2024. "Modeling pedestrian single-file movement: Extending the interaction to the follower," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
    10. Fu, Zhijian & Zhou, Xiaodong & Zhu, Kongjin & Chen, Yanqiu & Zhuang, Yifan & Hu, Yuqi & Yang, Lizhong & Chen, Changkun & Li, Jian, 2015. "A floor field cellular automaton for crowd evacuation considering different walking abilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 294-303.
    11. Lee, Ris S.C. & Hughes, Roger L., 2007. "Minimisation of the risk of trampling in a crowd," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 29-37.
    12. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    13. Fu, Zhijian & Yang, Lizhong & Chen, Yanqiu & Zhu, Kongjin & Zhu, Shi, 2013. "The effect of individual tendency on crowd evacuation efficiency under inhomogeneous exit attraction using a static field modified FFCA model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(23), pages 6090-6099.
    14. Li-ya Yao & Li-shan Sun & Wu-hong Wang & Hui Xiong, 2012. "Concept Layout Model of Transportation Terminals," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-8, December.
    15. Srinivasan, Aravinda Ramakrishnan & Karan, Farshad Salimi Naneh & Chakraborty, Subhadeep, 2017. "Pedestrian dynamics with explicit sharing of exit choice during egress through a long corridor," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 770-782.
    16. Fu, Zhijian & Luo, Lin & Yang, Yue & Zhuang, Yifan & Zhang, Peitong & Yang, Lizhong & Yang, Hongtai & Ma, Jian & Zhu, Kongjin & Li, Yanlai, 2016. "Effect of speed matching on fundamental diagram of pedestrian flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 458(C), pages 31-42.
    17. Shi, Yihan & Xu, Jie & Zhang, Hui & Jia, Limin & Qin, Yong, 2022. "Walking model on passenger in merging passage of subway station considering overtaking behavior," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    18. Adriano Festa & Paola Goatin & Fabio Vicini, 2023. "Navigation System-Based Routing Strategies in Traffic Flows on Networks," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 930-957, September.
    19. Xiaohong Li & Jianan Zhou & Feng Chen & Zan Zhang, 2018. "Cluster Risk of Walking Scenarios Based on Macroscopic Flow Model and Crowding Force Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9247-:d:459986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.