IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i24p9203-d459342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared Situational Awareness in a Professional Soccer Team: An Explorative Analysis of Post-Performance Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Gaute S. Schei

    (Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway)

  • Rune Giske

    (Department of Education and Sports Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

Sport science research has done little to elaborate on the cognitive factors that turn a collection of individual players into a coordinated elite team. The purpose of this paper is to clarify if the players and coach of an elite soccer team express shared situational awareness. Ten players and one coach were exposed to twelve video pictures from a previous soccer match, and their statements for each picture were recorded and analyzed using a qualitative approach. Two of five game situations were with ball possession and three out of seven were without ball possession; the player statements are contradictory, with a high threat for inadequate coordination. In seven of the twelve game situations, the players’ statements coincided and expressed a shared situational awareness, with good opportunities for adequate defensive and offensive coordination. In two of the game situations, there was a high threat for inadequate coordination. There was consensus among 9 out of 10 players, but the player with the divergent statement was central in the situation. The procedure followed in the study could be used to elucidate if a team has shared situational awareness and clarify in which situations there exists discrepancies and data that can be used to improve team coordination on and off the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaute S. Schei & Rune Giske, 2020. "Shared Situational Awareness in a Professional Soccer Team: An Explorative Analysis of Post-Performance Interviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9203-:d:459342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Klein, 2009. "Streetlights and Shadows: Searching for the Keys to Adaptive Decision Making," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262013398, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moshe Farjoun & Christopher Ansell & Arjen Boin, 2015. "PERSPECTIVE—Pragmatism in Organization Studies: Meeting the Challenges of a Dynamic and Complex World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1787-1804, December.
    2. Sarah Maslen & Jan Hayes, 2014. "Experts under the microscope: the Wivenhoe Dam case," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 183-193, June.
    3. Jan Hayes & Sarah Maslen, 2015. "Knowing stories that matter: learning for effective safety decision-making," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 714-726, June.
    4. Hartnett, Elizabeth J. & Daniel, Elizabeth M. & Holti, Richard, 2012. "Client and consultant engagement in public sector IS projects," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 307-317.
    5. Arjen Boin & Sanneke Kuipers & Werner Overdijk, 2013. "Leadership in Times of Crisis: A Framework for Assessment," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 79-91, April.
    6. Dew, Nicholas & Read, Stuart & Sarasvathy, Saras D. & Wiltbank, Robert, 2015. "Entrepreneurial expertise and the use of control," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 30-37.
    7. Yolande Piris & Nathalie Guibert, 2014. "Intuitive judgments effects when evaluating a product assortment," Post-Print hal-01726503, HAL.
    8. Sarah Maslen, 2015. "Organisational factors for learning in the Australian gas pipeline industry," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 896-909, August.
    9. Magnus Tuvendal & Johan Elmberg, 2015. "A Handshake between Markets and Hierarchies: Geese as an Example of Successful Collaborative Management of Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Jagannathan, Radha & Camasso, Michael J., 2017. "Social outrage and organizational behavior: A national study of child protective service decisions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 153-163.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9203-:d:459342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.