IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6694-d413508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Physical Activity Intervention Strategy for Pregnant Women in Buffalo City Municipality, South Africa: A Study Protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Uchenna Benedine Okafor

    (Department of Nursing Sciences, University of Fort Hare, 50 Church Street, East London 5201, South Africa)

  • Daniel Ter Goon

    (Department of Public Health, University of Fort Hare, 5 Oxford Street, East London 5201, South Africa)

Abstract

Despite global awareness about the importance and health benefits of physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, several studies have reported a low prevalence of PA participation among pregnant women in both developed and developing countries. This means that most pregnant women do not meet the current PA recommended guideline of 150 min of moderate intensity PA per week. The global call to prioritise PA participation levels in the general population necessitates evaluating the factors affecting PA practice. Seemingly, pregnant women mostly from low-to-middle income countries like South Africa are often predisposed to adverse pregnancy outcomes, possibly because of limited access to, and knowledge of, improved pregnancy and health outcomes as a result of PA participation. Physical activity has been sparsely studied among pregnant South African women, and specifically, there is no known study that assesses the PA levels, patterns, beliefs, sources of information, perceived benefits, barriers, attitudes of pregnant women concerning PA and exercise participation; nor one that explores the perspectives of healthcare providers regarding prenatal PA in the Eastern Cape Province. In addition, no PA intervention strategy exists to promote PA participation in the region. This study, in attempting to fill these gaps in knowledge, adopts two phases. In Phase I, a concurrent mixed-method (quantitative and qualitative) approach assesses the following factors related to PA participation in pregnant women: participation levels, beliefs, attitudes, perceived benefits, barriers to uptake and sources of information. It further ascertains if healthcare professionals are sufficiently informed about PA and if they are advising pregnant women about the need for PA participation during pregnancy. Data will be collected through a structured questionnaire, interviews and focus group discussions. Information on socio-demographic and maternal characteristics will be obtained, and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) will assess PA during pregnancy. A sample size of 384 pregnant women is the required minimum sample for an infinite population at a confidence level of 95%, a precision level of ± 5% and at a prevalence of PA or exercise during pregnancy of 50% ( p < 0.05); however, a sample size larger than the minimum number necessary will be recruited to account for possible attrition and to protect against possible data loss. Data will be analysed using a multiple logistic regression to determine the factors that predict sedentary or moderate PA levels and chi-squared analysis to determine the associations between the PA levels of the participants and socio-demographic and clinical variables. The study will assess the data collected on the above-mentioned variables and draw conclusions based on patterns and themes that emerge during analysis. Phase II of the study focuses on strategy development and validation to facilitate the promotion of PA during pregnancy. The developed strategy will be validated through the application of the Delphi technique and the administration of a checklist to selected key stakeholders through organised workshops. Understanding the level and correlates of PA participation among this special population is fundamental to designing intervention strategies to enhance their understanding of, and participation in, PA and exercise. Furthermore, this study’s findings will inform facility-based healthcare providers about the need to integrate health education on PA and pregnancy into antenatal and postnatal care visits in the setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Uchenna Benedine Okafor & Daniel Ter Goon, 2020. "Developing a Physical Activity Intervention Strategy for Pregnant Women in Buffalo City Municipality, South Africa: A Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6694-:d:413508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera & María Gallardo-Bravo & Joseba Aingerun Rabanales-Sotos & Ana Isabel Cobo-Cuenca & Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres, 2020. "Physical Activity Programs during Pregnancy Are Effective for the Control of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Isabelle Sinclair & Myriane St-Pierre & Guillaume Elgbeili & Paquito Bernard & Cathy Vaillancourt & Sonia Gagnon & Kelsey Needham Dancause, 2019. "Psychosocial Stress, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity during Pregnancy among Canadian Women: Relationships in a Diverse Cohort and a Nationwide Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Jovana Todorovic & Zorica Terzic-Supic & Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic & Pavle Piperac & Stefan Dugalic & Miroslava Gojnic-Dugalic, 2020. "Factors Associated with the Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA) during the First Trimester of the Pregnancy: The Cross-Sectional Study among Pregnant Women in Serbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Phung Thi Hoang Nguyen & Colin W. Binns & Cong Luat Nguyen & Anh Vo Van Ha & Khac Tan Chu & Dat Van Duong & Dung Van Do & Andy H. Lee, 2019. "Physical Activity During Pregnancy is Associated with Improved Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Ana Mendinueta & Haritz Esnal & Haritz Arrieta & Miren Arrue & Nerea Urbieta & Itziar Ubillos & Kristina W. Whitworth & Xavier Delclòs-Alió & Guillem Vich & Jesus Ibarluzea, 2020. "What Accounts for Physical Activity during Pregnancy? A Study on the Sociodemographic Predictors of Self-Reported and Objectively Assessed Physical Activity during the 1st and 2nd Trimesters of Pregna," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Izabela Walasik & Katarzyna Kwiatkowska & Katarzyna Kosińska Kaczyńska & Iwona Szymusik, 2020. "Physical Activity Patterns among 9000 Pregnant Women in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Mendinueta & Haritz Esnal & Haritz Arrieta & Miren Arrue & Nerea Urbieta & Itziar Ubillos & Kristina W. Whitworth & Xavier Delclòs-Alió & Guillem Vich & Jesus Ibarluzea, 2020. "What Accounts for Physical Activity during Pregnancy? A Study on the Sociodemographic Predictors of Self-Reported and Objectively Assessed Physical Activity during the 1st and 2nd Trimesters of Pregna," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Sávio F. Camargo & Juliana D. Camargo & Daniel Schwade & Raíssa M. Silva & Maria da Conceição M. Cornetta & Ricardo N. Cobucci & Eduardo C. Costa, 2021. "Movement Behavior during Pregnancy and Adverse Maternal–Fetal Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Pilot Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Uchenna Benedine Okafor & Daniel Ter Goon, 2020. "Physical Activity Level during Pregnancy in South Africa: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Asier Anabitarte & Mikel Subiza-Pérez & Jesús Ibarluzea & Kepa Azkona & Gonzalo García-Baquero & Carme Miralles-Guasch & Jon Irazusta & Kristina W. Whitworth & Guillem Vich & Aitana Lertxundi, 2020. "Testing the Multiple Pathways of Residential Greenness to Pregnancy Outcomes Model in a Sample of Pregnant Women in the Metropolitan Area of Donostia-San Sebastián," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Agnieszka Bień & Agnieszka Pieczykolan & Magdalena Korżyńska-Piętas & Joanna Grzesik-Gąsior, 2023. "Body Esteem and Self-Efficacy of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Yanbing Zhou & Xian Guo & Jinhao Mu & Jingying Liu & Hongying Yang & Chenxi Cai, 2022. "Current Research Trends, Hotspots, and Frontiers of Physical Activity during Pregnancy: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Victor Hugo Vazquez & Jesus III Loera & Juan David Camarillo & Humberto Martínez Bautista, "undated". "Risk factors associated with gestational diabetes in the northern region of Mexico," Mexican Stata Conference 2023 13, Stata Users Group.
    8. Gema Cabrera-Domínguez & María de la Calle & Gloria Herranz Carrillo & Santiago Ruvira & Pilar Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Silvia M. Arribas & David Ramiro-Cortijo, 2022. "Women during Lactation Reduce Their Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Compared to Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Katarzyna Kwiatkowska & Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska & Izabela Walasik & Agnieszka Osińska & Iwona Szymusik, 2021. "Physical Activity Patterns of Women with a Twin Pregnancy—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Madeleine France-Ratcliffe & Nicola D. Hopkins & David A. Low & Matthew S. Cocks & Helen Jones & Kayleigh S. Sheen & Victoria S. Sprung, 2022. "Perceptions of Antenatal Exercise in Pregnant Females and the Impact of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    11. José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera & María Gallardo-Bravo & Joseba Aingerun Rabanales-Sotos & Ana Isabel Cobo-Cuenca & Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres, 2020. "Physical Activity Programs during Pregnancy Are Effective for the Control of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6694-:d:413508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.