IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7928-d436541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Activity Level during Pregnancy in South Africa: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Uchenna Benedine Okafor

    (Department of Nursing Science, University of Fort Hare, 50 Church Street, East London, 5201, South Africa)

  • Daniel Ter Goon

    (Department of Public Health, University of Fort Hare, 5 Oxford Street, East London 5201, South Africa)

Abstract

Physical activity participation during pregnancy confers many maternal and foetal health benefits to the woman and her infant and is recommended by various health bodies and institutions. However, in South Africa, scant information exists about the physical activity status and its determinants among pregnant women. The aim of this study was to assess the physical activity level and associated factors among pregnant women. This cross-sectional study enrolled 1082 pregnant women attending public health facilities in Buffalo City Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Information on socio-demographic and maternal characteristics were obtained, and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess physical activity during pregnancy. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between physical activity and the predictor variables during pregnancy. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were applied to estimate factors associated with physical activity levels. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Only 278 of the women (25.7%) met recommendations for prenatal activity (≥150 min moderate intensity exercise per week). The average time spent in moderate–vigorous physical activity was 151.6 min (95% CI: 147.2–156.0). Most of the women participated in light exercises with a mean of 65.9% (95% CI: 64.8–67.0), and 47.6% (95% CI: 46.3–48.9) participated in household activities. The majority of the women did not receive physical activity advice during prenatal care sessions (64.7%). Factors negatively associated with prenatal physical activity were lower age (<19 years) (adjusted odd ratio (AOR) = 0.3; CI: 0.16–0.76), semi-urban residence (AOR = 0.8; CI: 0.55–1.03), lower educational level (AOR = 0.5; CI: 0.20–0.71), unemployment (AOR = 0.5; CI: 0.29–0.77) and nulliparity (AOR = 0.6; CI: 0.28–1.31). However, prenatal physical activity was positively associated with starting physical activity in the first trimester (AOR = 1.9; CI: 1.06–3.31) compared to other trimesters. The findings of this study demonstrated low levels of physical activity during pregnancy in South Africa. The majority of women did not meet the recommendation of 150 min of moderate intensity activity per week. Light intensity and household activities were the most preferred form of activity. The factors affecting physical activity of women in this present study include lower age, semi-urban setting, low educational level, unemployment and nulliparity. In order to increase activity levels, future work should seek to improve knowledge, access and support for physical activity in pregnant women in South Africa. This should include education and advocacy regarding physical activity for professionals involved in maternal health provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Uchenna Benedine Okafor & Daniel Ter Goon, 2020. "Physical Activity Level during Pregnancy in South Africa: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7928-:d:436541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Mendinueta & Haritz Esnal & Haritz Arrieta & Miren Arrue & Nerea Urbieta & Itziar Ubillos & Kristina W. Whitworth & Xavier Delclòs-Alió & Guillem Vich & Jesus Ibarluzea, 2020. "What Accounts for Physical Activity during Pregnancy? A Study on the Sociodemographic Predictors of Self-Reported and Objectively Assessed Physical Activity during the 1st and 2nd Trimesters of Pregna," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Jovana Todorovic & Zorica Terzic-Supic & Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic & Pavle Piperac & Stefan Dugalic & Miroslava Gojnic-Dugalic, 2020. "Factors Associated with the Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA) during the First Trimester of the Pregnancy: The Cross-Sectional Study among Pregnant Women in Serbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Jeong-Won Han & Ji-Soon Kang & Hanna Lee, 2020. "Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Maria Szubert & Malwina Ilowiecka & Jacek Wilczynski & Przemyslaw Bilinski & Cezary Wojtyla, 2020. "Health-Related Behaviors of Pregnant Women Residing in Urban and Rural Areas in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uchenna Benedine Okafor & Daniel Ter Goon, 2020. "Developing a Physical Activity Intervention Strategy for Pregnant Women in Buffalo City Municipality, South Africa: A Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Ana Mendinueta & Haritz Esnal & Haritz Arrieta & Miren Arrue & Nerea Urbieta & Itziar Ubillos & Kristina W. Whitworth & Xavier Delclòs-Alió & Guillem Vich & Jesus Ibarluzea, 2020. "What Accounts for Physical Activity during Pregnancy? A Study on the Sociodemographic Predictors of Self-Reported and Objectively Assessed Physical Activity during the 1st and 2nd Trimesters of Pregna," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Asier Anabitarte & Mikel Subiza-Pérez & Jesús Ibarluzea & Kepa Azkona & Gonzalo García-Baquero & Carme Miralles-Guasch & Jon Irazusta & Kristina W. Whitworth & Guillem Vich & Aitana Lertxundi, 2020. "Testing the Multiple Pathways of Residential Greenness to Pregnancy Outcomes Model in a Sample of Pregnant Women in the Metropolitan Area of Donostia-San Sebastián," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Maria Szubert & Malwina Ilowiecka & Jacek Wilczynski & Monika Szpotanska-Sikorska & Cezary Wojtyla, 2020. "Changes in Knowledge about Umbilical Cord Blood Banking and Genetic Tests among Pregnant Women from Polish Urban and Rural Areas between 2010–2012 and 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Gema Cabrera-Domínguez & María de la Calle & Gloria Herranz Carrillo & Santiago Ruvira & Pilar Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Silvia M. Arribas & David Ramiro-Cortijo, 2022. "Women during Lactation Reduce Their Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Compared to Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7928-:d:436541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.