IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6442-d408803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Ways of Working? A Rapid Exploration of Emerging Evidence Regarding the Care of Older People during COVID19

Author

Listed:
  • Éidín Ní Shé

    (School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield 4 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Deirdre O’Donnell

    (School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield 4 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Marie O’Shea

    (School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield 4 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Diarmuid Stokes

    (Liaison Librarian for Health and Science, University College Dublin, Belfield 4 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Health and social care staff have had to quickly adapt, respond and improve teamwork, as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to rapidly summarize the emerging evidence of new ways of working in the care of older people during this period. We conducted an exploration of the emerging evidence within the timeframe of 1 March 2020 to 11 May 2020. To capture a broad perspective, we undertook thematic analysis of Twitter data which was extracted through a broad search for new ways of working in health and social care. For a more in-depth focus on the health and social care of older people, we undertook a systematic scoping of newspapers using the Nexis UK database. We undertook a validation workshop with members of the interprofessional working group of the Irish National Integrated Care Programme for Older People, and with researchers. A total of 317 tweets were extracted related to six new ways of working. There was evidence of using telehealth to provide ongoing care to patients; interprofessional work; team meetings using online platforms; trust and collaboration within teams; as well as teams feeling empowered to change at a local level. 34 newspaper articles were extracted related to new ways of working in the care of older people, originating in England ( n = 17), Wales ( n = 6), Scotland ( n = 6), Ireland ( n = 4) and Germany ( n = 1). Four main themes were captured that focused on role expansion, innovations in communication, environmental restructuring and enablement. The results of this exploration of emerging evidence show that health and social care teams can transform very rapidly. Much of the change was based on goodwill as a response to the pandemic. Further analysis of empirical evidence of changing practices should include the perspectives of older people and should capture the resources needed to sustain innovations, as well as evaluate gaps in service provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Éidín Ní Shé & Deirdre O’Donnell & Marie O’Shea & Diarmuid Stokes, 2020. "New Ways of Working? A Rapid Exploration of Emerging Evidence Regarding the Care of Older People during COVID19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6442-:d:408803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Cesare Nurchis & Domenico Pascucci & Martina Sapienza & Leonardo Villani & Floriana D’Ambrosio & Francesco Castrini & Maria Lucia Specchia & Patrizia Laurenti & Gianfranco Damiani, 2020. "Impact of the Burden of COVID-19 in Italy: Results of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and Productivity Loss," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Cynthia Chew & Gunther Eysenbach, 2010. "Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Aspen Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2020. "Coverage of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning within Academic Literature, Canadian Newspapers, and Twitter Tweets: The Case of Disabled People," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madhan Balasubramanian & Stephanie Short, 2021. "The Future Health Workforce: Integrated Solutions and Models of Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-4, March.
    2. Sabrina Anjara & Robert Fox & Lisa Rogers & Aoife De Brún & Eilish McAuliffe, 2021. "Teamworking in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Catherine Aicken & Lisa Hodgson & Kay de Vries & Iain Wilkinson & Zena Aldridge & Kathleen Galvin, 2021. "‘This Adds Another Perspective’: Qualitative Descriptive Study Evaluating Simulation-Based Training for Health Care Assistants, to Enhance the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nisar, Sobia & Shafiq, Muhammad, 2019. "Framework for efficient utilisation of social media in Pakistan's healthcare sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 31-43.
    2. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Han, Chunjia & Yang, Mu & Piterou, Athena, 2021. "Do news media and citizens have the same agenda on COVID-19? an empirical comparison of twitter posts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Maria Lucia Specchia & Andrea Di Pilla & Martina Sapienza & Maria Teresa Riccardi & Americo Cicchetti & Gianfranco Damiani & Instant Report Group, 2021. "Dealing with COVID-19 Epidemic in Italy: Responses from Regional Organizational Models during the First Phase of the Epidemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Noraziani Khamis & Intan Syafinaz Saimy & Nor Hayati Ibrahim & Nur Khairah Badaruddin & Nor Zam Azihan Mohd Hassan & Faridah Kusnin & Sukhvinder Singh Sandhu & Masitah Mohamed, 2021. "Progression of the Pathway for Public Health Care during the COVID-19 Outbreak at District Health Office," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ of Quantum Technologies: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, March.
    7. Boonyanit Mathayomchan & Viriya Taecharungroj & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Evolution of COVID-19 tweets about Southeast Asian Countries: topic modelling and sentiment analyses," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 317-334, September.
    8. Elanor Colleoni & Nuccio Ludovico & Illia Laura & Ravindran Kiron, 2021. "Does Sharing Economy Have a Moral Capital? Comparing Semantic Networks in Social Media and News Media," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1, December.
    9. Nanath, Krishnadas & Balasubramanian, Sreejith & Shukla, Vinaya & Islam, Nazrul & Kaitheri, Supriya, 2022. "Developing a mental health index using a machine learning approach: Assessing the impact of mobility and lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Cindy Cheng & Joan Barceló & Allison Spencer Hartnett & Robert Kubinec & Luca Messerschmidt, 2020. "COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0)," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 756-768, July.
    11. Bruce Forrester, 2020. "Authentic chatter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 382-411, December.
    12. Greyling, Talita & Rossouw, Stephanie & Adhikari, Tamanna, 2020. "Happiness-lost: Did Governments make the right decisions to combat Covid-19?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 556, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Gregor Wolbring & Laiba Nasir, 2024. "Intersectionality of Disabled People through a Disability Studies, Ability-Based Studies, and Intersectional Pedagogy Lens: A Survey and a Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-77, September.
    14. Hongzhou Shen & Yue Ju & Zhijing Zhu, 2023. "Extracting Useful Emergency Information from Social Media: A Method Integrating Machine Learning and Rule-Based Classification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Gaspar, Rui & Yan, Zheng & Domingos, Samuel, 2019. "Extreme natural and man-made events and human adaptive responses mediated by information and communication technologies' use: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 125-135.
    16. David A Broniatowski & Michael J Paul & Mark Dredze, 2013. "National and Local Influenza Surveillance through Twitter: An Analysis of the 2012-2013 Influenza Epidemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    17. Jiayin Pei & Guang Yu & Xianyun Tian & Maureen Renee Donnelley, 2017. "A new method for early detection of mass concern about public health issues," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 516-532, April.
    18. Zeynep Ertem & Dorrie Raymond & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2018. "Optimal multi-source forecasting of seasonal influenza," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Jose L Herrera & Ravi Srinivasan & John S Brownstein & Alison P Galvani & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2016. "Disease Surveillance on Complex Social Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Ibrahim Musa & Hyun Woo Park & Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Keun Ho Ryu, 2018. "Global Research on Syndromic Surveillance from 1993 to 2017: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6442-:d:408803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.