IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1862-d1041302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extracting Useful Emergency Information from Social Media: A Method Integrating Machine Learning and Rule-Based Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Hongzhou Shen

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
    Research Center for Information Industry Integration, Innovation and Emergency Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Yue Ju

    (School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Zhijing Zhu

    (Nottingham University Business School China, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China)

Abstract

User-generated contents (UGCs) on social media are a valuable source of emergency information (EI) that can facilitate emergency responses. However, the tremendous amount and heterogeneous quality of social media UGCs make it difficult to extract truly useful EI, especially using pure machine learning methods. Hence, this study proposes a machine learning and rule-based integration method (MRIM) and evaluates its EI classification performance and determinants. Through comparative experiments on microblog data about the “July 20 heavy rainstorm in Zhengzhou” posted on China’s largest social media platform, we find that the MRIM performs better than pure machine learning methods and pure rule-based methods, and that its performance is influenced by microblog characteristics such as the number of words, exact address and contact information, and users’ attention. This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating machine learning and rule-based methods to mine the text of social media UGCs and provides actionable suggestions for emergency information management practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongzhou Shen & Yue Ju & Zhijing Zhu, 2023. "Extracting Useful Emergency Information from Social Media: A Method Integrating Machine Learning and Rule-Based Classification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1862-:d:1041302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu (Lucy) Yan & Alfonso J. Pedraza‐Martinez, 2019. "Social Media for Disaster Management: Operational Value of the Social Conversation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(10), pages 2514-2532, October.
    2. Meesters, Kenny & Derczynski, Leon & Bontcheva, Kalina & Maynard, Diana, 2018. "Helping Crisis Responders Find the Informative Needle in the Tweet Haystack," Other publications TiSEM bbcbee10-2c0c-4f3c-a4b2-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Dionne Mitcham & Morgan Taylor & Curtis Harris, 2021. "Utilizing Social Media for Information Dispersal during Local Disasters: The Communication Hub Framework for Local Emergency Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Mingyun Gu & Haixiang Guo & Jun Zhuang & Yufei Du & Lijin Qian, 2022. "Social Media User Behavior and Emotions during Crisis Events," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Cynthia Chew & Gunther Eysenbach, 2010. "Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Purnawirawan, Nathalia & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Dens, Nathalie, 2012. "Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: How Perceived Usefulness Affects Attitudes and Intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 244-255.
    7. Clarissa C David & Jonathan Corpus Ong & Erika Fille T Legara, 2016. "Tweeting Supertyphoon Haiyan: Evolving Functions of Twitter during and after a Disaster Event," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eunae Yoo & Elliot Rabinovich & Bin Gu, 2020. "The Growth of Follower Networks on Social Media Platforms for Humanitarian Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2696-2715, December.
    2. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Kaushik, Kapil & Mishra, Rajhans & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Exploring reviews and review sequences on e-commerce platform: A study of helpful reviews on Amazon.in," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 21-32.
    4. Sanaji & Tias Andarini Indarwati & Ika Diyah Candra, 2021. "The influence of perceived ease of use, perceive usefulness, and trust on customer's intention to use "Bebas Bayar" mobile payment application in Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 726-738, June.
    5. Anton Ivanov & Zhasmina Tacheva & Abdullatif Alzaidan & Sebastian Souyris & Albert C. England, 2023. "Informational value of visual nudges during crises: Improving public health outcomes through social media engagement amid COVID‐19," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(8), pages 2400-2419, August.
    6. Dena Yadin & Inbal Yahav & Lior Zalmanson & Nira Munichor, 2024. "Resolving the Ethical Tension Between Creating a Civil Environment and Facilitating Free Expression Online: Comment Reordering as an Alternative to Comment Moderation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 261-283, June.
    7. Shi Shen & Ke Shi & Junwang Huang & Changxiu Cheng & Min Zhao, 2023. "Global online social response to a natural disaster and its influencing factors: a case study of Typhoon Haiyan," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Boonyanit Mathayomchan & Viriya Taecharungroj & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Evolution of COVID-19 tweets about Southeast Asian Countries: topic modelling and sentiment analyses," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 317-334, September.
    9. Elanor Colleoni & Nuccio Ludovico & Illia Laura & Ravindran Kiron, 2021. "Does Sharing Economy Have a Moral Capital? Comparing Semantic Networks in Social Media and News Media," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1, December.
    10. Zheng Shen, 2024. "Shall brands create their own virtual influencers? A comprehensive study of 33 virtual influencers on Instagram," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Bruce Forrester, 2020. "Authentic chatter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 382-411, December.
    12. Greyling, Talita & Rossouw, Stephanie & Adhikari, Tamanna, 2020. "Happiness-lost: Did Governments make the right decisions to combat Covid-19?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 556, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    14. Gaspar, Rui & Yan, Zheng & Domingos, Samuel, 2019. "Extreme natural and man-made events and human adaptive responses mediated by information and communication technologies' use: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 125-135.
    15. Alekh Gour & Shikha Aggarwal & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Lending ears to unheard voices: An empirical analysis of user‐generated content on social media," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2457-2476, June.
    16. Bin Guo & Shasha Zhou, 2017. "What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 585-608, December.
    17. Zeng, Guojun & Cao, Xinning & Lin, Zhibin & Xiao, Sarah H., 2020. "When online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Jiayin Pei & Guang Yu & Xianyun Tian & Maureen Renee Donnelley, 2017. "A new method for early detection of mass concern about public health issues," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 516-532, April.
    19. Zeynep Ertem & Dorrie Raymond & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2018. "Optimal multi-source forecasting of seasonal influenza," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Kong, Juan & Lou, Chen, 2023. "Do cultural orientations moderate the effect of online review features on review helpfulness? A case study of online movie reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1862-:d:1041302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.