IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6201-d404497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Determination in People with Intellectual Disability: The Mediating Role of Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Vicente

    (Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, C./Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Cristina Mumbardó-Adam

    (Psychology and Educational Sciences Studies, Open University of Catalonia, Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Verónica M. Guillén

    (Department of Education, University of Cantabria, Av./de los Castros, 52, 39005 Santander, Spain)

  • Teresa Coma-Roselló

    (Department of Education, University of Zaragoza, C./Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • María-Ángeles Bravo-Álvarez

    (Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, C./Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Sergio Sánchez

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, C./Francisco Tomas y Valiente, 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities have proclaimed the basic right of people to make one’s own choices, have an effective participation and inclusion. Research in the field of disability have stressed self-determination as a key construct because of its impact on their quality of life and the achievement of desired educational and adulthood related outcomes. Self-determination development must be promoted through specific strategies and especially, by providing tailored opportunities to practice those skills. Providing these opportunities across environments could be especially relevant as a facilitator of self-determination development. This manuscript aims to ascertain if opportunities at home and in the community to engage in self-determined actions are mediating the relationship between people intellectual disability level and their self-determination. Results have confirmed direct effects of intellectual disability level on self-determination scores. Indirect effects also predicted self-determination and almost all its related components (self-initiation, self-direction, self-regulation, self-realization, and empowerment) through opportunities in the community and at home. Autonomy was predicted by the intellectual disability level through an indirect effect of opportunities at home, but not in the community. These results highlight the need for further research to better operationalize and promote contextually rooted opportunities for people with intellectual disability to become more self-determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Vicente & Cristina Mumbardó-Adam & Verónica M. Guillén & Teresa Coma-Roselló & María-Ángeles Bravo-Álvarez & Sergio Sánchez, 2020. "Self-Determination in People with Intellectual Disability: The Mediating Role of Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6201-:d:404497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert L. Schalock & Ruth Luckasson & Karrie A. Shogren, 2020. "Going beyond Environment to Context: Leveraging the Power of Context to Produce Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phyllis King Shui Wong & Amy Yin Man Chow, 2021. "Self-Determination Competencies, (Dis)Agreement in Decision-Making, and Personal Well-Being of Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Marta Medina-García & Lina Higueras-Rodríguez & Mª del Mar García-Vita & Luis Doña-Toledo, 2021. "ICT, Disability, and Motivation: Validation of a Measurement Scale and Consequence Model for Inclusive Digital Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Pavlos Kapsalakis & Evdoxia Nteropoulou-Nterou, 2024. "Perspectives of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities on Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Alrabiah, Abdalmajeed H., 2024. "Self-determination and parents’ perceptions and practices: Opportunity and performance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Lilian Castro-Durán & Gloria Sanzana-Vallejos & Viviana Vallejos-Garcías & Rafael Zapata-Lamana & Ana Mendoza-Mardones & Loreto Dávila-Opazo & Javiera Duhart-Carrión & Inti Huaiquipan-Ortega & Igor Ci, 2024. "Linguistic and Cultural Adaptation of a Self-Determination Scale for People with Intellectual Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Swerts & Laura E. Gómez & Jessica Maeyer & Goedele Nil & Wouter Vanderplasschen, 2022. "Development of the Quality of Life in Youth Services Scale (QOLYSS): Content-Related Validity Evidence Based on Adolescents’ and Expert Reviewers’ Perspectives," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 593-612, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6201-:d:404497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.