IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1186-d1472508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities on Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pavlos Kapsalakis

    (Primary Special Education School, Ministry of Education, Religious Affairs, and Sports, 15122 Marousi, Greece
    Department of Early Childhood Education, School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece)

  • Evdoxia Nteropoulou-Nterou

    (Department of Early Childhood Education, School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Experiences of occupational participation of adults with Intellectual Disabilities (IDs) were explored through the lens of the Model of Occupational Justice (MOJ) and Critical Theory in order to shape and develop an occupation-centered model of quality of life (QoL). This qualitative study involved thirteen adults with IDs ( N = 13). A semi-structured interview, constructed based on MOJ and Critical Theory principles, was administered to explore perspectives on QoL, as well as injustices regarding occupational participation. The interviews were analyzed using QSR NVivo8 and followed a content analysis methodology. A preliminary model of Occupational Quality of Life (O-QoL), with an everyday occupations core component, has been formed. The model includes three core O-QoL domains: (i) social well-being, (ii) emotional–physical well-being, and (iii) material adequacy. Key indicators of O-QoL were identified as leisure and social activities, while socioenvironmental factors such as occupational deprivation were noted as aggravating. Specific occupations, including leisure activities, physical exercise/sports, art, video games, and vocational training, were found to be beneficial for O-QoL. Moreover, the importance of promoting and supporting the rights of people with IDs for employment, independent living, and sexual expression was highlighted. The model of O-QoL (version 1) could be a valuable alternative conceptual framework of QoL in the field of IDs; however, further research is needed to validate and refine the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavlos Kapsalakis & Evdoxia Nteropoulou-Nterou, 2024. "Perspectives of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities on Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1186-:d:1472508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paquette, G. & Bouchard, Julie & Dion, Jacinthe & Tremblay, Karine N. & Tourigny, M. & Tougas, Anne-Marie & Hélie, Sonia, 2018. "Factors associated with intellectual disabilities in maltreated children according to caseworkers in child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 38-45.
    2. Andreja Brajša-Žganec & Marina Merkaš & Iva Šverko, 2011. "Quality of Life and Leisure Activities: How do Leisure Activities Contribute to Subjective Well-Being?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 81-91, May.
    3. Laura Esteban & Patricia Navas & Miguel Ángel Verdugo & Víctor B. Arias, 2021. "Community Living, Intellectual Disability and Extensive Support Needs: A Rights-Based Approach to Assessment and Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Michael L. Wehmeyer, 2020. "The Importance of Self-Determination to the Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disability: A Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-7, September.
    5. Eva Vicente & Cristina Mumbardó-Adam & Verónica M. Guillén & Teresa Coma-Roselló & María-Ángeles Bravo-Álvarez & Sergio Sánchez, 2020. "Self-Determination in People with Intellectual Disability: The Mediating Role of Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Tufan Nayir & Ersin Uskun & Mustafa Volkan Yürekli & Hacer Devran & Ayşe Çelik & Ramazan Azim Okyay, 2016. "Does Body Image Affect Quality of Life?: A Population Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lilian Castro-Durán & Gloria Sanzana-Vallejos & Viviana Vallejos-Garcías & Rafael Zapata-Lamana & Ana Mendoza-Mardones & Loreto Dávila-Opazo & Javiera Duhart-Carrión & Inti Huaiquipan-Ortega & Igor Ci, 2024. "Linguistic and Cultural Adaptation of a Self-Determination Scale for People with Intellectual Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Alfonso Urzúa & Claudia Miranda-Castillo & Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar & Franco Mascayano, 2013. "Do Cultural Values Affect Quality of Life Evaluation?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 1295-1313, December.
    3. Fatih Terzi & Handan Türkoğlu & Fulin Bölen & Perver Baran & Tayfun Salihoğlu, 2015. "Residents’ Perception of Cultural Activities as Quality of Life in Istanbul," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 211-234, May.
    4. Change Zhu & Christine Walsh & Lulin Zhou & Xinjie Zhang, 2023. "Latent Classification Analysis of Leisure Activities and Their Impact on ADL, IADL and Cognitive Ability of Older Adults Based on CLHLS (2008–2018)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Marta Medina-García & Lina Higueras-Rodríguez & Mª del Mar García-Vita & Luis Doña-Toledo, 2021. "ICT, Disability, and Motivation: Validation of a Measurement Scale and Consequence Model for Inclusive Digital Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Seolwoo Park & Dongkyun Ahn, 2022. "Seeking Pleasure or Meaning? The Different Impacts of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Tourism Happiness on Tourists’ Life Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Philipp Schulz & Julian Schulte & Sven Raube & Hala Disouky & Christian Kandler, 2018. "The Role of Leisure Interest and Engagement for Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1135-1150, April.
    8. Majed A. Alsalem & Hana A. Alzahrani, 2023. "The Role of Institutional Practice in Promoting Inclusive Education for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students: A Critical Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    9. Sunwoo Park & Hyejin Yoon & Chulmo Koo & Won Seok Lee, 2021. "Role of the Leisure Attributes of Shared Bicycles in Promoting Leisure Benefits and Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    10. David Newman & Louis Tay & Ed Diener, 2014. "Leisure and Subjective Well-Being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 555-578, June.
    11. Oliviero Carboni & Paolo Russu, 2015. "Assessing Regional Wellbeing in Italy: An Application of Malmquist–DEA and Self-organizing Map Neural Clustering," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 677-700, July.
    12. Javier Reyes-Martínez & David Takeuchi & Oscar A. Martínez-Martínez & Margaret Lombe, 2021. "The Role of Cultural Participation on Subjective Well-Being in Mexico," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 1321-1341, June.
    13. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Conditions and Purchasing Power Parity in Determining Quality of Life among Big Asian Cities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 292-305, May.
    14. Bimonte, Salvatore & Faralla, Valeria, 2016. "Does residents' perceived life satisfaction vary with tourist season? A two-step survey in a Mediterranean destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-208.
    15. KangJae Jerry Lee & Seonghee Cho & Eui Kyung Kim & Sunhwan Hwang, 2020. "Do More Leisure Time and Leisure Repertoire Make Us Happier? An Investigation of the Curvilinear Relationships," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1727-1747, June.
    16. Linghan Zhang & Junyi Zhang, 2018. "Impacts of Leisure and Tourism on the Elderly’s Quality of Life in Intimacy: A Comparative Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Phyllis King Shui Wong & Amy Yin Man Chow, 2021. "Self-Determination Competencies, (Dis)Agreement in Decision-Making, and Personal Well-Being of Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Zhan, Weihai & Smith, Susan R. & Warner, Lynette C. & North, Fred & Wilhelm, Sara & Nowak, Amanda, 2019. "Quality of life among children and adolescents in foster family homes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Okay Gunes & Armagan Tuna Aktuna-Gunes, 2015. "Satisfactory time use elasticities of demand and measuring well-being inequality through superposed utilities," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15019, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    20. Xinyu (Judy) Hu & Larissa K. Barber & Alecia M. Santuzzi, 2021. "Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 2003-2029, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1186-:d:1472508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.