IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5621-d394483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives Emerged from Students and Supervisory Staff Interaction in Drug Use Prevention: A Q Methodology Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Chiu-Mieh Huang

    (Institute of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Jung-Yu Liao

    (Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan)

  • Hsiao-Pei Hsu

    (Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Yu Lin

    (Department of Radio, Television & Film, Shih Hsin University, Taipei 116, Taiwan)

  • Jong-Long Guo

    (Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study aims to identify and describe the patterns of shared perspectives of students and supervisory staff associated with their interaction in drug use prevention. We applied the Q methodology to cluster participants into groups according to the similarities of their Q sorts. A total of 31 pairs of students and their supervisory staff participated in the study to rank the designed Q statements. The Q factor analysis for supervisory staff revealed a five-factor solution that accounted for 58% of the total variance. Another five-factor solution for the students explained 49% of the total variance. One similarity between the groups was the need to enhance the involvement of significant others to help the students quit drugs. A major identified difference between the groups was that whereas the students highlighted the importance of health consequences of drug use in helping them stop use, the supervisory staff did not. The elucidation of similarities and differences between supervisory staff and students could offer more insightful strategies of preventing the drug use.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiu-Mieh Huang & Jung-Yu Liao & Hsiao-Pei Hsu & Cheng-Yu Lin & Jong-Long Guo, 2020. "Perspectives Emerged from Students and Supervisory Staff Interaction in Drug Use Prevention: A Q Methodology Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5621-:d:394483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lakind, Davielle & Atkins, Marc & Eddy, J. Mark, 2015. "Youth mentoring relationships in context: Mentor perceptions of youth, environment, and the mentor role," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 52-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li-Ting Lu & Chiu-Mieh Huang & Su-Fei Huang & Shu-I Wu & Jong-Long Guo, 2020. "Perspectives of the Elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment Living Alone on Participating in a Dementia Prevention Program: A Q Methodology Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-11, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Downey, Sarah K. & Lyons, Michael D. & Williams, Joanna L., 2022. "The role of family relationships in youth mentoring: An ecological perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. McMorris, Barbara J. & Doty, Jennifer L. & Weiler, Lindsey M. & Beckman, Kara J. & Garcia-Huidobro, Diego, 2018. "A typology of school-based mentoring relationship quality: Implications for recruiting and retaining volunteer mentors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 149-157.
    3. Busse, Heide & Campbell, Rona & Kipping, Ruth, 2018. "Examining the wider context of formal youth mentoring programme development, delivery and maintenance: A qualitative study with mentoring managers and experts in the United Kingdom," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-108.
    4. Yoo-Yeong Seonwoo & Yun-Duk Jeong, 2021. "Exploring Factors That Influence Taekwondo Student Athletes’ Intentions to Pursue Careers Contributing to the Sustainability of the Korean Taekwondo Industry Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Dutton, Hilary & Deane, Kelsey L. & Bullen, Pat, 2018. "Distal and experiential perspectives of relationship quality from mentors, mentees, and program staff in a school-based youth mentoring program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 53-62.
    6. Limor Goldner & Adar Ben-Eliyahu, 2021. "Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-29, May.
    7. Erdem, Gizem & DuBois, David L. & Larose, Simon & De Wit, David J. & Lipman, Ellen L., 2024. "Associations of youth mentoring with parent emotional well-being and family functioning: Longitudinal findings from a study of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Eberhard Raithelhuber, 2019. "Rearranging Differential Inclusion through Civic Solidarity: Loose Coupling in Mentorship for “Unaccompanied Minors”," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 149-164.
    9. Baran, Małgorzata & Zarzycki, Roland, 2021. "Key effects of mentoring processes — multi-tool comparative analysis of the career paths of mentored employees with non-mentored employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5621-:d:394483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.