IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4680-d377964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobilizing for Community Benefits to Assess Health and Promote Environmental Justice near the Gordie Howe International Bridge

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Sampson

    (Department of Health & Human Services, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA)

  • Simone Sagovac

    (Southwest Detroit Community Benefits Coalition, Detroit, MI 48209, USA)

  • Amy Schulz

    (Health Behavior Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Lauren Fink

    (Detroit Health Department, Detroit, MI 48207, USA)

  • Graciela Mentz

    (Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Angela Reyes

    (Detroit Health Department, Detroit, MI 48207, USA)

  • Kristina Rice

    (Center for Global Health Equity, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Ricardo de Majo

    (Health Behavior Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Cindy Gamboa

    (Detroit Health Department, Detroit, MI 48207, USA)

  • Bridget Vial

    (Michigan Environmental Justice Coalition, Detroit, MI 48209, USA)

Abstract

Transportation infrastructure decisions contribute to social, economic, and health inequities in the U.S. Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) may improve understanding of potential strategies to mitigate adverse effects on quality of life from planned developments. We use the Gordie Howe International Bridge (GHIB), currently under construction in southwest Detroit, MI, as a case study to examine 15 years of community mobilization, which resulted in community benefits that included an HIA. We describe community engagement processes, household survey methods, and select findings of the baseline HIA, with a focus on their application to inform recommendations to promote quality of life. Baseline HIA results indicated significantly higher self-reported asthma rates among children living within 500 feet of trucking routes. Residents reported substantial economic (e.g., decreased home values), health (e.g., adverse outcomes, lack of health care access), and environmental (e.g., air pollution) concerns related to the GHIB. We discuss specific recommendations, based on HIA results, to reduce adverse impacts of the GHIB. These recommendations will inform ongoing community benefits negotiations. This case study provides lessons for community, academic, and government partners conducting HIAs, especially during building and operation of major infrastructure, and discusses their potential role in improving community engagement opportunities towards environmental justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Sampson & Simone Sagovac & Amy Schulz & Lauren Fink & Graciela Mentz & Angela Reyes & Kristina Rice & Ricardo de Majo & Cindy Gamboa & Bridget Vial, 2020. "Mobilizing for Community Benefits to Assess Health and Promote Environmental Justice near the Gordie Howe International Bridge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4680-:d:377964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristie M. Ellickson & Sarah M. Sevcik & Shelley Burman & Steven Pak & Frank Kohlasch & Gregory C. Pratt, 2011. "Cumulative Risk Assessment and Environmental Equity in Air Permitting: Interpretation, Methods, Community Participation and Implementation of a Unique Statute," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Sophia Christakopoulou & Jon Dawson & Aikaterini Gari, 2001. "The Community Well-Being Questionnaire: Theoretical Context and Initial Assessment of Its Reliability and Validity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 319-349, December.
    3. Andrea Hricko & Glovioell Rowland & Sandrah Eckel & Angelo Logan & Maryam Taher & John Wilson, 2014. "Global Trade, Local Impacts: Lessons from California on Health Impacts and Environmental Justice Concerns for Residents Living near Freight Rail Yards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Lisa Schweitzer & Jiangping Zhou, 2010. "Neighborhood Air Quality, Respiratory Health, and Vulnerable Populations in Compact and Sprawled Regions," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 363-371.
    5. Kim Gilhuly & Marnie Purciel & Lili Farhang & Jennifer Lucky & Emily Celia Harris & Jonathan Heller & Edmund Yet Wah Seto, 2011. "Using health impact assessment in community development to improve air quality and public health," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 193-207, April.
    6. Michael Woolcock, 2019. "When Do Development Projects Enhance Community Well-Being?," CID Working Papers 355, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Sirgy & Robin Widgery & Dong-Jin Lee & Grace Yu, 2010. "Developing a Measure of Community Well-Being Based on Perceptions of Impact in Various Life Domains," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 295-311, April.
    2. Fang Wang & Yaoyao Peng & Chunyan Jiang, 2017. "Influence of Road Patterns on PM 2.5 Concentrations and the Available Solutions: The Case of Beijing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Juwon Chung & Seung-Nam Kim & Hyungkyoo Kim, 2019. "The Impact of PM 10 Levels on Pedestrian Volume: Findings from Streets in Seoul, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Saad Saleem Bhatti & Nitin Kumar Tripathi & Masahiko Nagai & Vilas Nitivattananon, 2017. "Spatial Interrelationships of Quality of Life with Land Use/Land Cover, Demography and Urbanization," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 1193-1216, July.
    5. Iskandar Zainuddin Rela & Abd Hair Awang & Zaimah Ramli & Sarmila Md Sum & Meisanti Meisanti, 2020. "Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental well‐being perception and the mediation role of community resilience," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2176-2187, September.
    6. Jung Eun Kang & D.K. Yoon & Hyun-Joo Bae, 2019. "Evaluating the effect of compact urban form on air quality in Korea," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 179-200, January.
    7. Rista Ardy Priatama & Kenichiro Onitsuka & Ernan Rustiadi & Satoshi Hoshino, 2019. "Social Interaction of Indonesian Rural Youths in the Internet Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Forouhar, Navid & Forouhar, Amir & Hasankhani, Mahnoosh, 2022. "Commercial gentrification and neighbourhood change: A dynamic view on local residents' quality of life in Tehran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Figueroa, Maria J. & Nielsen, Thomas A. Sick & Siren, Anu, 2014. "Comparing urban form correlations of the travel patterns of older and younger adults," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 10-20.
    10. Alina Palimaru & Ron D. Hays, 2017. "Associations of Health-Related Quality of Life with Overall Quality of Life in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Project," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 241-250, June.
    11. Jones, Peter & Lucas, Karen, 2012. "The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 4-16.
    12. Peter Newman, 2014. "Density, the Sustainability Multiplier: Some Myths and Truths with Application to Perth, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Abd Hair Awang & Iskandar Zainuddin Rela & Azlan Abas & Mohamad Arfan Johari & Mohammad Effendi Marzuki & Mohd Noor Ramdan Mohd Faudzi & Adri Musa, 2021. "Peat Land Oil Palm Farmers’ Direct and Indirect Benefits from Good Agriculture Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Man Yuan & Mingrui Yan & Zhuoran Shan, 2021. "Is Compact Urban Form Good for Air Quality? A Case Study from China Based on Hourly Smartphone Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Jiansheng Wu & Junhao Zhou & Wen Zhang, 2020. "A Framework to Classify Environmental Inequity in Absolute and Relative Terms, and Its Application in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    16. McGreevy, Michael & Harris, Patrick & Delaney-Crowe, Toni & Fisher, Matt & Sainsbury, Peter & Riley, Emily & Baum, Fran, 2020. "How well do Australian government urban planning policies respond to the social determinants of health and health equity?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Patricia J. Rogers & Michael Woolcock, 2023. "Process and Implementation Evaluations: A Primer," CID Working Papers 433, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    18. Tom Rye & Anders Wretstrand, 2019. "Swedish and Scottish National Transport Policy and Spend: A Social Equity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Hedefalk, Finn & van Dijk, Ingrid K & Dribe, Martin, 2022. "Childhood neighborhoods and cause-specific adult mortality in Sweden 1939-2015," SocArXiv ynpb3_v1, Center for Open Science.
    20. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Cohen, Adam MCRP & Bayen, Alexandre PhD, 2024. "The Benefits of Carpooling," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7jx6z631, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4680-:d:377964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.