IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i20p4007-d278322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk-Averse Shelter Location and Evacuation Routing Assignment Problem in an Uncertain Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Bian Liang

    (School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Dapeng Yang

    (School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xinghong Qin

    (School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Teresa Tinta

    (Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

Abstract

Disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods continue to have devastating socioeconomic impacts and endanger millions of lives. Shelters are safe zones that protect victims from possible damage, and evacuation routes are the paths from disaster zones toward shelter areas. To enable the timely evacuation of disaster zones, decisions regarding shelter location and routing assignment (i.e., traffic assignment) should be considered simultaneously. In this work, we propose a risk-averse stochastic programming model with a chance constraint that takes into account the uncertainty in the demand of disaster sites while minimizing the total evacuation time. The total evacuation time reflects the efficacy of emergency management from a system optimal (SO) perspective. A conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) is incorporated into the objective function to account for risk measures in the presence of uncertain post-disaster demand. We resolve the non-linear travel time function of traffic flow by employing a second-order cone programming (SOCP) approach and linearizing the non-linear chance constraints into a new mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) reformulation so that the problem can be directly solved by state-of-the-art optimization solvers. We illustrate the application of our model using two case studies. The first case study is used to demonstrate the difference between a risk-neutral model and our proposed model. An extensive computational study provides practical insight into the proposed modeling approach using another case study concerning the Black Saturday bushfire in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Bian Liang & Dapeng Yang & Xinghong Qin & Teresa Tinta, 2019. "A Risk-Averse Shelter Location and Evacuation Routing Assignment Problem in an Uncertain Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4007-:d:278322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4007/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/4007/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahdi Mostajabdaveh & Walter J. Gutjahr & F. Sibel Salman, 2019. "Inequity-averse shelter location for disaster preparedness," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 809-829, August.
    2. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    3. Bish, Douglas R. & Sherali, Hanif D., 2013. "Aggregate-level demand management in evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 79-92.
    4. Lee D. Han & Fang Yuan & Shih-Miao Chin & Holing Hwang, 2006. "Global Optimization of Emergency Evacuation Assignments," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 502-513, December.
    5. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Yetis Kara, Bahar & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Correia, Isabel, 2018. "Modeling the shelter site location problem using chance constraints: A case study for Istanbul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 132-145.
    6. Ben-Porath, Elchanan & Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1997. "On the Measurement of Inequality under Uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 194-204, July.
    7. Hengjie Zhang & Fang Wang & Huali Tang & Yucheng Dong, 2019. "An Optimization-Based Approach to Social Network Group Decision Making with an Application to Earthquake Shelter-Site Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Jin Y. Yen, 1971. "Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(11), pages 712-716, July.
    9. Gino J. Lim & Mukesh Rungta & Ayda Davishan, 2019. "A robust chance constraint programming approach for evacuation planning under uncertain demand distribution," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 589-604, June.
    10. Qinpeng Wang & Longfei He, 2018. "Managing Risk Aversion for Low-Carbon Supply Chains with Emission Abatement Outsourcing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Elçi, Özgün & Noyan, Nilay, 2018. "A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic programming model for humanitarian relief network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 55-83.
    12. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Pan, Cheng, 2014. "A method for designing centralized emergency supply network to respond to large-scale natural disasters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 284-305.
    13. Ng, ManWo & Waller, S. Travis, 2010. "Reliable evacuation planning via demand inflation and supply deflation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1086-1094, November.
    14. Halit Üster & Jyotirmoy Dalal, 2017. "Strategic emergency preparedness network design integrating supply and demand sides in a multi-objective approach," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 395-413, April.
    15. Goerigk, Marc & Deghdak, Kaouthar & T’Kindt, Vincent, 2015. "A two-stage robustness approach to evacuation planning with buses," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 66-82.
    16. Kılcı, Fırat & Kara, Bahar Yetiş & Bozkaya, Burçin, 2015. "Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 323-332.
    17. Lim, Gino J. & Zangeneh, Shabnam & Reza Baharnemati, M. & Assavapokee, Tiravat, 2012. "A capacitated network flow optimization approach for short notice evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 234-245.
    18. Pillac, Victor & Van Hentenryck, Pascal & Even, Caroline, 2016. "A conflict-based path-generation heuristic for evacuation planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 136-150.
    19. Goerigk, Marc & Deghdak, Kaouthar & Heßler, Philipp, 2014. "A comprehensive evacuation planning model and genetic solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 82-97.
    20. Li, Anna C.Y. & Nozick, Linda & Xu, Ningxiong & Davidson, Rachel, 2012. "Shelter location and transportation planning under hurricane conditions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 715-729.
    21. Kimms, A. & Maiwald, M., 2018. "Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1122-1136.
    22. Hediye Tuydes-Yaman & Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos, 2014. "Modeling demand management strategies for evacuations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 491-512, June.
    23. Bayram, Vedat & Tansel, Barbaros Ç. & Yaman, Hande, 2015. "Compromising system and user interests in shelter location and evacuation planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 146-163.
    24. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    25. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    26. Shahparvari, Shahrooz & Chhetri, Prem & Abbasi, Babak & Abareshi, Ahmad, 2016. "Enhancing emergency evacuation response of late evacuees: Revisiting the case of Australian Black Saturday bushfire," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-176.
    27. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay, 2015. "Evacuation Planning with Endogenous Transportation Network Degradations: A Stochastic Cell-Based Model and Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 677-696, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shengjie Long & Dezhi Zhang & Shuangyan Li & Shuanglin Li, 2023. "Two-Stage Multi-Objective Stochastic Model on Patient Transfer and Relief Distribution in Lockdown Area of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Aghaie, Sepide & Karimi, Behrooz, 2022. "Location-allocation-routing for emergency shelters based on geographical information system (ArcGIS) by NSGA-II (case study: Earthquake occurrence in Tehran (District-1))," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Irem Sahmutoglu & Alev Taskin & Ertugrul Ayyildiz, 2023. "Assembly area risk assessment methodology for post-flood evacuation by integrated neutrosophic AHP-CODAS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 1071-1103, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bayram, Vedat & Yaman, Hande, 2024. "A joint demand and supply management approach to large scale urban evacuation planning: Evacuate or shelter-in-place, staging and dynamic resource allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 171-191.
    2. Esposito Amideo, A. & Scaparra, M.P. & Kotiadis, K., 2019. "Optimising shelter location and evacuation routing operations: The critical issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 279-295.
    3. Vedat Bayram & Hande Yaman, 2018. "Shelter Location and Evacuation Route Assignment Under Uncertainty: A Benders Decomposition Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 416-436, March.
    4. Wang, Qingyi & Wallace, Stein W., 2022. "Non-compliance in transit-based evacuation pick-up point assignments," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    5. Xuedong Yan & Xiaobing Liu & Yulei Song, 2018. "Optimizing evacuation efficiency under emergency with consideration of social fairness based on a cell transmission model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Liu, Kanglin & Liu, Changchun & Xiang, Xi & Tian, Zhili, 2023. "Testing facility location and dynamic capacity planning for pandemics with demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 150-168.
    7. Alizadeh, Morteza & Amiri-Aref, Mehdi & Mustafee, Navonil & Matilal, Sumohon, 2019. "A robust stochastic Casualty Collection Points location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 965-983.
    8. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Wang, Qingyi & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for emergency supply planning considering transportation network mitigation and traffic congestion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Liu, Kanglin & Yang, Liu & Zhao, Yejia & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2023. "Multi-period stochastic programming for relief delivery considering evolving transportation network and temporary facility relocation/closure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Kimms, A. & Maiwald, M., 2018. "Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1122-1136.
    12. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Xiaozheng He & Hong Zheng & Srinivas Peeta & Yongfu Li, 2018. "Network Design Model to Integrate Shelter Assignment with Contraflow Operations in Emergency Evacuation Planning," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1027-1050, December.
    14. Ghasemi, Peiman & Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh, 2021. "A robust simulation-optimization approach for pre-disaster multi-period location–allocation–inventory planning," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 69-95.
    15. Jiang-Hua Zhang & Hai-Yue Liu & Rui Zhu & Yang Liu, 2017. "Emergency Evacuation of Hazardous Chemical Accidents Based on Diffusion Simulation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, December.
    16. Hasti Seraji & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Sobhan Asian & Harpreet Kaur, 2022. "An integrative location-allocation model for humanitarian logistics with distributive injustice and dissatisfaction under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 211-257, December.
    17. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Yi, Wenqi & Nozick, Linda & Davidson, Rachel & Blanton, Brian & Colle, Brian, 2017. "Optimization of the issuance of evacuation orders under evolving hurricane conditions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 285-304.
    19. Rambha, Tarun & Nozick, Linda K. & Davidson, Rachel & Yi, Wenqi & Yang, Kun, 2021. "A stochastic optimization model for staged hospital evacuation during hurricanes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Yiping Jiang & Yufei Yuan, 2019. "Emergency Logistics in a Large-Scale Disaster Context: Achievements and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:4007-:d:278322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.