IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v51y2019i8p809-829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequity-averse shelter location for disaster preparedness

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdi Mostajabdaveh
  • Walter J. Gutjahr
  • F. Sibel Salman

Abstract

We study the problem of selecting a set of shelter locations in preparation for natural disasters. Shelters provide victims of a disaster both a safe place to stay and relief necessities such as food, water and medical support. Individuals from the affected population living in a set of population points go to, or are transported to the assigned open shelters. We aim to take both efficiency and inequity into account, thus we minimize a linear combination of: (i) the mean distance between opened shelter locations and the locations of the individuals assigned to them; and (ii) Gini’s Mean Absolute Difference of these distances. We develop a stochastic programming model with a set of scenarios that consider uncertain demand and disruptions in the transportation network. A chance constraint is defined on the total cost of opening the shelters and their capacity expansion. In this stochastic context, a weighted mean of the so-called ex ante and ex post versions of the inequity-averse objective function under uncertainty is optimized. Since the model can be solved to optimality only for small instances, we develop a tailored Genetic Algorithm (GA) that utilizes a mixed-integer programming subproblem to solve this problem heuristically for larger instances. We compare the performance of the mathematical program and the GA via benchmark instances where the model can be solved to optimality or near optimality. It turns out that the GA yields small optimality gaps in much shorter time for these instances. We run the GA also on Istanbul data to drive insights to guide decision-makers for preparation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdi Mostajabdaveh & Walter J. Gutjahr & F. Sibel Salman, 2019. "Inequity-averse shelter location for disaster preparedness," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 809-829, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:51:y:2019:i:8:p:809-829
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2018.1496372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2018.1496372
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2018.1496372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Violet Xinying & Hooker, J.N., 2022. "Combining leximax fairness and efficiency in a mathematical programming model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 235-248.
    2. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Liu, Kanglin & Yang, Liu & Zhao, Yejia & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2023. "Multi-period stochastic programming for relief delivery considering evolving transportation network and temporary facility relocation/closure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Eghbal Akhlaghi, Vahid & Campbell, Ann Melissa & de Matta, Renato E., 2021. "Fuel distribution planning for disasters: Models and case study for Puerto Rico," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Alem, Douglas & Caunhye, Aakil M. & Moreno, Alfredo, 2022. "Revisiting Gini for equitable humanitarian logistics," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    6. Bian Liang & Dapeng Yang & Xinghong Qin & Teresa Tinta, 2019. "A Risk-Averse Shelter Location and Evacuation Routing Assignment Problem in an Uncertain Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Mohammadmehdi Hakimifar & Vera C. Hemmelmayr & Fabien Tricoire, 2023. "A lexicographic maximin approach to the selective assessment routing problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 205-249, March.
    8. Violet Xinying Chen & J. N. Hooker, 2023. "A guide to formulating fairness in an optimization model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 581-619, July.
    9. Yoon Ha Lee & Ji Soo Lee & Seung Chan Baek & Won Hwa Hong, 2020. "Spatial Equity with Census Population Data vs. Floating Population Data: The Distribution of Earthquake Evacuation Shelters in Daegu, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Hengliang & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "The efficiency, equity and effectiveness of location strategies in humanitarian logistics: A robust chance-constrained approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Sarid, Adi S. & Glynn, Peter W. & Tzur, Michal, 2024. "Power distribution in developing countries — Planning for effectiveness and equity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    12. Liu, Kanglin & Liu, Changchun & Xiang, Xi & Tian, Zhili, 2023. "Testing facility location and dynamic capacity planning for pandemics with demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 150-168.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:51:y:2019:i:8:p:809-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.