IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i20p3847-d275432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disruptive Technologies for Environment and Health Research: An Overview of Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things

Author

Listed:
  • Frederico M. Bublitz

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Center for Strategic Technologies in Health (NUTES), State University of Paraiba (UEPB), Campina Grande, PB 58429-500, Brazil
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Arlene Oetomo

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kirti S. Sahu

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Amethyst Kuang

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Laura X. Fadrique

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pedro E. Velmovitsky

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Raphael M. Nobrega

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Plinio P. Morita

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
    Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2J 0E2, Canada
    Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive research paper is to initiate discussions on the use of innovative technologies and their potential to support the research and development of pan-Canadian monitoring and surveillance activities associated with environmental impacts on health and within the health system. Its primary aim is to provide a review of disruptive technologies and their current uses in the environment and in healthcare. Drawing on extensive experience in population-level surveillance through the use of technology, knowledge from prior projects in the field, and conducting a review of the technologies, this paper is meant to serve as the initial steps toward a better understanding of the research area. In doing so, we hope to be able to better assess which technologies might best be leveraged to advance this unique intersection of health and environment. This paper first outlines the current use of technologies at the intersection of public health and the environment, in particular, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Blockchain, and the Internet of Things (IoT). The paper provides a description for each of these technologies, along with a summary of their current applications, and a description of the challenges one might face with adopting them. Thereafter, a high-level reference architecture, that addresses the challenges of the described technologies and could potentially be incorporated into the pan-Canadian surveillance system, is conceived and presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederico M. Bublitz & Arlene Oetomo & Kirti S. Sahu & Amethyst Kuang & Laura X. Fadrique & Pedro E. Velmovitsky & Raphael M. Nobrega & Plinio P. Morita, 2019. "Disruptive Technologies for Environment and Health Research: An Overview of Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:3847-:d:275432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/20/3847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donghyun Lee & Suna Kang & Jungwoo Shin, 2017. "Using Deep Learning Techniques to Forecast Environmental Consumption Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Shripad Tuljapurkar & Nan Li & Carl Boe, 2000. "A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6788), pages 789-792, June.
    3. M. Hino & E. Benami & N. Brooks, 2018. "Machine learning for environmental monitoring," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 583-588, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baoshi Sun & Qiaoli Zhang & Shi Cao, 2020. "Development and Implementation of a Self-Optimizable Smart Lighting System Based on Learning Context in Classroom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Belfiore, Alessandra & Cuccurullo, Corrado & Aria, Massimo, 2022. "IoT in healthcare: A scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Idiano D’Adamo & Assunta Di Vaio & Alessandro Formiconi & Antonio Soldano, 2022. "European IoT Use in Homes: Opportunity or Threat to Households?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Booth, Heather, 2006. "Demographic forecasting: 1980 to 2005 in review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 547-581.
    2. Geert Zittersteyn & Jennifer Alonso-García, 2021. "Common Factor Cause-Specific Mortality Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Duncan Gillespie & Meredith Trotter & Shripad Tuljapurkar, 2014. "Divergence in Age Patterns of Mortality Change Drives International Divergence in Lifespan Inequality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 1003-1017, June.
    4. Frank T. Denton & Byron G. Spencer, 2011. "A Dynamic Extension of the Period Life Table," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 24(34), pages 831-854.
    5. de Jong, Piet & Tickle, Leonie & Xu, Jianhui, 2020. "A more meaningful parameterization of the Lee–Carter model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Blake, David & Dowd, Kevin & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2008. "Longevity risk and the Grim Reaper's toxic tail: The survivor fan charts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 1062-1066, June.
    7. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2009-015 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Hans Fehr & Sabine Jokisch & Laurence J Kotlikoff, 2006. "Will China Eat Our Lunch or Take Us to Dinner? Simulating the Transition Paths of the US, EU, Japan and China," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Christopher Kent & Anna Park & Daniel Rees (ed.),Demography and Financial Markets, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    9. Hong Li & Johnny Siu-Hang Li, 2017. "Optimizing the Lee-Carter Approach in the Presence of Structural Changes in Time and Age Patterns of Mortality Improvements," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(3), pages 1073-1095, June.
    10. Hunt, Andrew & Villegas, Andrés M., 2015. "Robustness and convergence in the Lee–Carter model with cohort effects," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 186-202.
    11. Heather Booth & Rob J Hyndman & Leonie Tickle & Piet de Jong, 2006. "Lee-Carter mortality forecasting: a multi-country comparison of variants and extensions," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 13/06, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    12. Chia, Ngee-Choon & Tsui, Albert K.C., 2005. "Medical savings accounts in Singapore: how much is adequate?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 855-875, September.
    13. Rembrandt D. Scholz & Heiner Maier, 2003. "German unification and the plasticity of mortality at older ages," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2003-031, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    14. Michael J. Weir & Thomas W. Sproul, 2019. "Identifying Drivers of Genetically Modified Seafood Demand: Evidence from a Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Jin-Young Kim & Sung-Bae Cho, 2019. "Electric Energy Consumption Prediction by Deep Learning with State Explainable Autoencoder," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Hyndman, Rob J. & Booth, Heather, 2008. "Stochastic population forecasts using functional data models for mortality, fertility and migration," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 323-342.
    17. S. Haberman & A. E. Renshaw, 2009. "Measurement of Longevity Risk Using Bootstrapping for Lee–Carter and Generalised Linear Poisson Models of Mortality," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 443-461, September.
    18. Basellini, Ugofilippo & Camarda, Carlo Giovanni & Booth, Heather, 2023. "Thirty years on: A review of the Lee–Carter method for forecasting mortality," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1033-1049.
    19. He, Lingyu & Huang, Fei & Shi, Jianjie & Yang, Yanrong, 2021. "Mortality forecasting using factor models: Time-varying or time-invariant factor loadings?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 14-34.
    20. Nico Keilman & Dinh Quang Pham & Arve Hetland, 2002. "Why population forecasts should be probabilistic - illustrated by the case of Norway," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 6(15), pages 409-454.
    21. Jackie Li, 2014. "An application of MCMC simulation in mortality projection for populations with limited data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(1), pages 1-48.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:20:p:3847-:d:275432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.