IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i10p1859-d234518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Driving Mechanism of Waste Separation Behavior: Based on Qualitative Analysis of Chinese Urban Residents

Author

Listed:
  • Feiyu Chen

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Da Xue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hong Chen

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Da Xue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Meifen Wu

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Da Xue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shanshan Li

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Da Xue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ruyin Long

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Da Xue Road 1, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Waste source separation is the fundamental premise to ensure effective waste recycling. Whether the entire waste recycling and reduction process can be effectively carried out depends on the waste source separation. Clarifying the driving mechanism of waste separation behavior plays an important role in effectively guiding the urban residents’ waste separation behavior and achieving waste recycling. In this study, qualitative analysis was used to explore the driving mechanism of waste separation behavior. Through the open coding, axial coding and selective coding of the in-depth interview data collected from 323 Chinese urban residents, the study has proposed and verified the four-dimensional structure of waste separation behavior, namely, waste separation behavior of habit, decision, relationship, and citizen. The main driving factors of urban residents’ waste separation behavior have been clarified. On this basis, a theoretical model for the driving mechanism of waste separation behavior was constructed in this study. Ten main categories of factors have been presented, namely, value orientation, cognition of separation, regulatory focus, preferences for comfort, perception of separation empowerment, policy and standards, products and facilities, group norms, links trustworthiness, and social demography variables. Moreover, four typical relationship structures were proposed. Finally, the intervention policy suggestions were made to effectively guide the urban residents’ waste separation behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Feiyu Chen & Hong Chen & Meifen Wu & Shanshan Li & Ruyin Long, 2019. "Research on the Driving Mechanism of Waste Separation Behavior: Based on Qualitative Analysis of Chinese Urban Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1859-:d:234518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Tsung Hung & Jan, Fen-Hauh & Yang, Chung-Cheng, 2013. "Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 454-468.
    2. Steven Cooke & Jesse Vermaire, 2015. "Environmental studies and environmental science today: inevitable mission creep and integration in action-oriented transdisciplinary areas of inquiry, training and practice," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(1), pages 70-78, March.
    3. Chen, Hong & Chen, Feiyu & Huang, Xinru & Long, Ruyin & Li, Wenjie, 2017. "Are individuals’ environmental behavior always consistent?—An analysis based on spatial difference," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 25-36.
    4. Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin & Niu, Wenjing & Feng, Qun & Yang, Ranran, 2014. "How does individual low-carbon consumption behavior occur? – An analysis based on attitude process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 376-386.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guoqiang He & Tao Yu, 2023. "RETRACTED: Evaluating the Benefits and Potential of “Plastic Reduction”: A Case Study of College Students in Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Mengge Hao & Dongyong Zhang & Stephen Morse, 2020. "Waste Separation Behaviour of College Students under a Mandatory Policy in China: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Qiannan Zhuo & Chen Liu & Beiqi Wang & Wanglin Yan, 2023. "Bridging Local Governments and Residents for Household Waste Source Separation Using a Business-Driven, Multi-Stakeholder Cooperative Partnership Model—A Case Study of HUGE Recycling in Yuhang, Hangzh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feiyu Chen & Hong Chen & Jiahui Yang & Ruyin Long & Qianwen Li, 2018. "Impact of Information Intervention on the Recycling Behavior of Individuals with Different Value Orientations—An Experimental Study on Express Delivery Packaging Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Xiaodong Zhu & Rongrong Gu & Bingbing Wu & Shunsuke Managi, 2017. "Does Hazy Weather Influence Earnings Management of Heavy-Polluting Enterprises? A Chinese Empirical Study from the Perspective of Negative Social Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Pappas, Nikolaos & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2017. "Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece: Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 31-41.
    5. Carlos Sánchez‐Camacho & Rocío Carranza & David Martín‐Consuegra & Estrella Díaz, 2022. "Evolution, trends and future research lines in corporate social responsibility and tourism: A bibliometric analysis and science mapping," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 462-476, June.
    6. Qian-Qian Huang & Hong-Jian Qu & Pei Li, 2022. "The Influence of Virtual Idol Characteristics on Consumers’ Clothing Purchase Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Sangmin Lee & Donghan Kim & Sunwoo Park & Wonseok Lee, 2021. "A Study on the Strategic Decision Making Used in the Revitalization of Fishing Village Tourism: Using A’WOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Licheng Sun & Qunwei Wang & Shilong Ge, 2018. "Urban resident energy-saving behavior: a case study under the A2SC framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(2), pages 515-536, March.
    9. Bob Foster & Zikri Muhammad & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Juhari Noor Faezah & Muhamad Deni Johansyah & Jing Yi Yong & Adnan ul-Haque & Jumadil Saputra & Thurasamy Ramayah & Olawole Fawehinmi, 2022. "Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the Workplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Mihai F. Băcilă & Raluca Ciornea & Luiza M. Souca & Alexandra M. Drule, 2022. "Content Analysis on Sustainability Dimensions in DMOs’ Social Media Videos Advertising the World’s Most Visited Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Šimková Eva & Kořínková Barbora & Obršálová Kristýna, 2023. "Environmental Education of Tourists for Sustainable Tourism Development," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 12(1-2), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Sakshi Goyal & Praveen Goyal, 2024. "The evolution of pro‐environmental behavior research in three decades using bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4133-4153, September.
    13. Ping Li & Fuyuan Wang & Xin Zheng & Jinku Huang, 2020. "Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Urban Community Tourism Development: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Emily A. Royse & Amanda D. Manzanares & Heqiao Wang & Kevin C. Haudek & Caterina Belle Azzarello & Lydia R. Horne & Daniel L. Druckenbrod & Megan Shiroda & Sol R. Adams & Ennea Fairchild & Shirley Vin, 2024. "FEW questions, many answers: using machine learning to assess how students connect food–energy–water (FEW) concepts," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Meng-Tsung Lee & Jen-Ming Liu & Elaine Q. Borazon, 2020. "Evaluating the Effect of Perceived Value of Ecosystem Services on Tourists’ Behavioral Intentions for Aogu Coastal Wetland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Min-Seong Kim & Jinwon Kim & Brijesh Thapa, 2018. "Influence of Environmental Knowledge on Affect, Nature Affiliation and Pro-Environmental Behaviors among Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Geng, Jichao & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2016. "Impact of information intervention on travel mode choice of urban residents with different goal frames: A controlled trial in Xuzhou, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 134-147.
    18. Xia, Senmao & Ling, Yantao & de Main, Leanne & Lim, Ming K. & Li, Gendao & Zhang, Peter & Cao, Mengqiu, 2022. "Creating a low carbon economy through green supply chain management: investigation of willingness-to-pay for green products from a consumer’s perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Liu, Diyi & Du, Huibin & Southworth, Frank & Ma, Shoufeng, 2017. "The influence of social-psychological factors on the intention to choose low-carbon travel modes in Tianjin, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 42-53.
    20. Olivier Boiral & Pascal Paillé & Nicolas Raineri, 2015. "The nature of employees’ pro-environmental behaviors," Post-Print hal-03795985, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1859-:d:234518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.