IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i12p2713-d187066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Untapped Resources: 10- to 13-Year-Old Primary Schoolchildren’s Views on Additional Physical Activity in the School Setting: A Focus Group Study

Author

Listed:
  • Vera Van den Berg

    (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Vera van den Berg and Eline E. Vos share first authorship as they contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eline E. Vos

    (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Vera van den Berg and Eline E. Vos share first authorship as they contributed equally to this work.)

  • Renate H. M. De Groot

    (Welten Institute-Research Centre for Learning, Teaching and Technology, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
    Department of Complex Genetics, School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism/Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Amika S. Singh

    (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Mai J. M. Chinapaw

    (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Schools are considered ideal venues to promote physical activity (PA) in children. However, a knowledge gap exists on how to adequately integrate PA into the school day and in particular, on the preferences of children regarding additional PA in school. Therefore, the aim of our qualitative study was to gain comprehensive insight into 10–13-year-old primary schoolchildren’s perspectives on how to increase PA in the school setting. We conducted nine focus groups (32 girls and 20 boys) with children attending the final two grades of primary school in the Netherlands. We used inductive thematic analysis to analyze the data. The results showed that children were enthusiastic about additional PA in school. Children suggested various ways to increase PA, including more time for PA in the existing curriculum, e.g., physical education (PE), recess, and occasional activities, such as field trips or sports days; school playground adaptation; improving the content of PE; and implementing short PA breaks and physically active academic lessons. Children emphasized variation and being given a voice in their PA participation as a prerequisite to keep PA enjoyable and interesting in the long term. Finally, children mentioned the role of the teacher and making efforts to accommodate all children and their different preferences as important. Children have concrete ideas, acknowledging the challenges that accompany integrating additional PA in school. We therefore recommend actively involving children in efforts to increase school-based PA and to make “additional PA in school” a shared project of teachers and students.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera Van den Berg & Eline E. Vos & Renate H. M. De Groot & Amika S. Singh & Mai J. M. Chinapaw, 2018. "Untapped Resources: 10- to 13-Year-Old Primary Schoolchildren’s Views on Additional Physical Activity in the School Setting: A Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2713-:d:187066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2713/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2713/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Webster, Collin A. & Zarrett, Nicole & Cook, Brittany S. & Egan, Cate & Nesbitt, Danielle & Weaver, R. Glenn, 2017. "Movement integration in elementary classrooms: Teacher perceptions and implications for program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 134-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vera van den Berg & Amika S. Singh & Annet Komen & Chris Hazelebach & Ivo van Hilvoorde & Mai J. M. Chinapaw, 2019. "Integrating Juggling with Math Lessons: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Effects of Physically Active Learning on Maths Performance and Enjoyment in Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walker, Timothy J. & Szeszulski, Jacob & Robertson, Michael C. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Fernandez, Maria E., 2022. "Understanding implementation strategies to support classroom-based physical activity approaches in elementary schools: A qualitative study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Blake Densley & Hannah G. Calvert & Peter Boedeker & Lindsey Turner, 2021. "Implementation of Physical Activity in US Elementary Schools: The Role of Administrative Support, Financial Resources, and Champions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Adriana Nielsen-Rodríguez & Ramón Romance & Juan Carlos Dobado-Castañeda, 2021. "Teaching Methodologies and School Organization in Early Childhood Education and Its Association with Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Gabriella M. McLoughlin & Hannah G. Calvert & Lindsey Turner, 2023. "Individual and Contextual Factors Associated with Classroom Teachers’ Intentions to Implement Classroom Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Egan, Cate A. & Webster, Collin & Weaver, R. Glenn & Brian, Ali & Stodden, David & Russ, Laura & Nesbitt, Danielle & Vazou, Spyridoula, 2018. "Partnerships for Active Children in Elementary Schools (PACES): First year process evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-69.
    6. Myrto F. Mavilidi & Sue Bennett & Fred Paas & Anthony D. Okely & Spyridoula Vazou, 2021. "Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Norris, E. & Dunsmuir, S. & Duke-Williams, O. & Stamatakis, E. & Shelton, N., 2018. "Mixed method evaluation of the Virtual Traveller physically active lesson intervention: An analysis using the RE-AIM framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 107-114.
    8. Vanesa Alcántara-Porcuna & Mairena Sánchez-López & Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno & María Martínez-Andrés & Abel Ruiz-Hermosa & Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín, 2021. "Parents’ Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators of Physical Activity among Schoolchildren: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Singletary, Camelia R. & Weaver, Glenn & Carson, Russell L. & Beets, Michael W. & Pate, Russell R. & Saunders, Ruth P. & Peluso, Alexandra G. & Moore, Justin B., 2019. "Evaluation of a comprehensive school physical activity program: Be a Champion!," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 54-60.
    10. Sobolewski, Kristina Maria & Lobo, Larissa T. & Stoddart, Alexandra L. & Kerpan, Serene, 2024. "Exploring teachers’ perspectives on movement integration using a job-embedded professional development intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2713-:d:187066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.