IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i10p2227-d174958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Measurement Scale of Gender-Friendly Hospital Environments: An Exploratory Study of Customer Perceptions in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Ying-Chyi Chou

    (Department of Business Administration, Tunghai University, Taichung 40704, Taiwan)

  • Van Thac Dang

    (Business School, Research Institute for Guangdong-Taiwan Business Cooperation, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China)

  • Hsin-Yi Yen

    (Department of International Business, Providence University, Taichung 43301, Taiwan)

  • Pi-Shan Hsu

    (Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taichung 40704, Taiwan)

Abstract

According to the United Nations, males and females should be given equal treatment in physical and psychological services, and healthcare institutions should exert greater efforts to reduce the gap in gender equality. However, this issue has been largely ignored in previous literature on healthcare environments. Designing a hospital environment that focuses on gender differences is critical to academic researchers and practical managers in all healthcare institutions. Thus, as an exploratory effort, this study aims to develop a measurement to assess customer perceptions of gender-friendly hospital environments. To identify and refine the structure of the instrument, two studies are conducted at different hospitals in Taiwan. The exploratory evidence shows there are five factors (i.e., physical design, functional design, marking design, gender perception, and gender-friendly services) and 28 items in the measurement scale of gender-friendly hospital environments. Results also show that gender-friendly hospital environments affect customers’ loyalty and willingness to pay. Based on our findings, hospital practitioners and researchers can adopt the measurement instrument used in this study to deal with the gap of gender equality in healthcare environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying-Chyi Chou & Van Thac Dang & Hsin-Yi Yen & Pi-Shan Hsu, 2018. "Developing a Measurement Scale of Gender-Friendly Hospital Environments: An Exploratory Study of Customer Perceptions in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2227-:d:174958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anselmsson, Johan & Burt, Steve & Tunca, Burak, 2017. "An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Vishwas Maheshwari & George Lodorfos & Siril Jacobsen, 2014. "Determinants of Brand Loyalty: A Study of the Experience-Commitment-Loyalty Constructs," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(6), pages 13-23, November.
    4. Chan Choi, S., 2017. "Defensive strategy against a private label: Building brand premium for retailer cooperation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 335-339.
    5. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    6. Sandra Maria Correia Loureiro & Rui Lopes & Hans Ruediger Kaufmann, 2014. "How brand personality, brand identification and service quality influence service brand equity," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-1, October.
    7. Sri Setyo Iriani, 2021. "Do you (still) hire celebrities to increase purchase intention?," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 3(3), pages 38-45, July.
    8. Kunal Swani & Lauren I. Labrecque, 2020. "Like, Comment, or Share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 279-298, September.
    9. Allah Wasaya & Bilal Khan & Muhammad Shafee & Mirza Sajid Mahmood, 2016. "Impact of Brand Equity, Advertisement and Hedonic Consumption Tendencies on Cognitive Dissonance: A Mediation Study," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 154-162, June.
    10. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    11. Willems, Kim, 2022. "Brand personality appeal in retailing: Comparing fashion- and grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Boisvert, Jean & Christodoulides, George & Sajid Khan, M., 2023. "Toward a better understanding of key determinants and consequences of masstige consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Jalal Hanaysha, 2016. "The Importance of Product Innovation in Driving Brand Success: An Empirical Study on Automotive Industry," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 8(1), pages 35-43, March.
    14. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    15. Anne Schmitz & Nieves Villaseñor-Román, 2018. "Do Brands Matter in Unlisted Firms? An Empirical Study of the Association between Brand Equity and Financial Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Factors affecting Indian shoppers׳ attitude and purchase intention: An empirical check," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 561-569.
    17. Beyza GÜLTEKİN & Kadir YAĞIZ & Leyla ŞENTÜRK-ÖZER, 2024. "Examining Fitness Centre Members' Perceived Risk, Attitude, and Behavioural Intentions in the Context of Brand Equity during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 32(60).
    18. Beatriz Moliner-Velázquez & María Fuentes-Blasco & Irene Gil-Saura, 2019. "Effects of value and innovation on brand equity in retailing," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 658-674, November.
    19. Jahanvi, Jahanvi & Sharma, Meenakshi, 2021. "Brand respect: Conceptualization, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 115-123.
    20. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2227-:d:174958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.