IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i9p10329-10351d54756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Sabariego

    (Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology—IBE, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich 81377, Germany)

  • Cornelia Oberhauser

    (Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology—IBE, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich 81377, Germany)

  • Aleksandra Posarac

    (Social Protection and Labor, Human Development Network, The World Bank, Washington, DC 20433, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jerome Bickenbach

    (Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil 6207, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nenad Kostanjsek

    (Classification, Terminology and Standards, Department of Health Statistics and Informatics, World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Somnath Chatterji

    (Department of Health Statistics and Information Systems, World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alana Officer

    (Ageing and Life Course Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Michaela Coenen

    (Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology—IBE, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich 81377, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lay Chhan

    (National Institute of Statistics, Phnom Penh 12301, Cambodia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alarcos Cieza

    (Blindness and Deafness Prevention, Disability and Rehabilitation (BDD), World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland)

Abstract

The usual approach in disability surveys is to screen persons with disability upfront and then ask questions about everyday problems. The objectives of this paper are to demonstrate the impact of screeners on disability rates, to challenge the usual exclusion of persons with mild and moderate disability from disability surveys and to demonstrate the advantage of using an a posteriori cut-off. Using data of a pilot study of the WHO Model Disability Survey (MDS) in Cambodia and the polytomous Rasch model, metric scales of disability were built. The conventional screener approach based on the short disability module of the Washington City Group and the a posteriori cut-off method described in the World Disability Report were compared regarding disability rates. The screener led to imprecise rates and classified persons with mild to moderate disability as non-disabled, although these respondents already experienced important problems in daily life. The a posteriori cut-off applied to the general population sample led to a more precise disability rate and allowed for a differentiation of the performance and needs of persons with mild, moderate and severe disability. This approach can be therefore considered as an inclusive approach suitable to monitor the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Sabariego & Cornelia Oberhauser & Aleksandra Posarac & Jerome Bickenbach & Nenad Kostanjsek & Somnath Chatterji & Alana Officer & Michaela Coenen & Lay Chhan & Alarcos Cieza, 2015. "Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:9:p:10329-10351:d:54756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/9/10329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/9/10329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Masters, 1982. "A rasch model for partial credit scoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 149-174, June.
    2. Mair, Patrick & Hatzinger, Reinhold, 2007. "Extended Rasch Modeling: The eRm Package for the Application of IRT Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i09).
    3. Choi, Seung W. & Gibbons, Laura E. & Crane, Paul K., 2011. "lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i08).
    4. Robert Jennrich & Peter Bentler, 2011. "Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 537-549, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marja Eliisa Holm & Päivi Sainio & Jaana Suvisaari & Katri Sääksjärvi & Tuija Jääskeläinen & Suvi Parikka & Seppo Koskinen, 2022. "Differences in Unfavorable Lifestyle Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic between People with and without Disabilities in Finland: Psychological Distress as a Mediator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Eric Emerson & Gwynnyth Llewellyn, 2022. "Disability among Women and Men Who Married in Childhood: Evidence from Cross-Sectional Nationally Representative Surveys Undertaken in 37 Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Jerome E. Bickenbach & Alarcos Cieza & Carla Sabariego, 2016. "Disability and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, January.
    4. Verena Loidl & Cornelia Oberhauser & Carolina Ballert & Michaela Coenen & Alarcos Cieza & Carla Sabariego, 2016. "Which Environmental Factors Have the Highest Impact on the Performance of People Experiencing Difficulties in Capacity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Gołata Elżbieta & Dehnel Grażyna, 2021. "Credibility of disability estimates from the 2011 population census in Poland," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 41-65, June.
    6. Inge Debrouwere & Pedro Celestino Álvarez Vera & Ximena del Carmen Pavón Benítez & Celia Katherine Rosero Arboleda & Peter Prinzie & Jo Lebeer, 2021. "Lessons from Disability Counting in Ecuador, with a Contribution from Primary Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Islay Mactaggart & Ammar Hasan Bek & Lena Morgon Banks & Tess Bright & Carlos Dionicio & Shaffa Hameed & Shailes Neupane & GVS Murthy & Ahmed Orucu & Joseph Oye & Jonathan Naber & Tom Shakespeare & An, 2021. "Interrogating and Reflecting on Disability Prevalence Data Collected Using the Washington Group Tools: Results from Population-Based Surveys in Cameroon, Guatemala, India, Maldives, Nepal, Turkey and ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Kwok Ng & Piritta Asunta & Niko Leppä & Pauli Rintala, 2020. "Intra-Rater Test-Retest Reliability of a Modified Child Functioning Module, Self-Report Version," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Jennifer H. Madans & Daniel Mont & Mitchell Loeb, 2015. "Comments on Sabariego et al . Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health , 2015, 12 , 10329–10351," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, December.
    10. Ivana Ivandic & Kaloyan Kamenov & Diego Rojas & Gloria Cerón & Dennis Nowak & Carla Sabariego, 2017. "Determinants of Work Performance in Workers with Depression and Anxiety: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Manjula Marella & Donna Koolmees & Chandalin Vongvilay & Bernard Frank & Wesley Pryor & Fleur Smith, 2021. "Development of a Digital Case Management Tool for Community Based Inclusive Development Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rikkert M. van der Lans & Ridwan Maulana & Michelle Helms-Lorenz & Carmen-María Fernández-García & Seyeoung Chun & Thelma de Jager & Yulia Irnidayanti & Mercedes Inda-Caro & Okhwa Lee & Thys Coetze, 2021. "Student Perceptions of Teaching Quality in Five Countries: A Partial Credit Model Approach to Assess Measurement Invariance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    2. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Cervantes, Víctor H., 2017. "DFIT: An R Package for Raju's Differential Functioning of Items and Tests Framework," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i05).
    4. Wenling Liu & Ziping Xu & Tianan Yang, 2018. "Health Effects of Air Pollution in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:36:c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kai Liu & Longfei Zhang & Dongbo Tu & Yan Cai, 2022. "Developing an Item Bank of Computerized Adaptive Testing for Eating Disorders in Chinese University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    7. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:35:i12 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Torbjørn Torsheim & Franco Cavallo & Kate Ann Levin & Christina Schnohr & Joanna Mazur & Birgit Niclasen & Candace Currie, 2016. "Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: a Latent Variable Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(3), pages 771-784, September.
    10. Wenjia Wang & Mickaël Guedj & Viviane Bertrand & Julie Foucquier & Elisabeth Jouve & Daniel Commenges & Cécile Proust-Lima & Niall P Murphy & Olivier Blin & Laurent Magy & Daniel Cohen & Shahram Attar, 2017. "A Rasch Analysis of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS) in a Cohort of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 1A Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Clemens Draxler & Andreas Kurz & Can Gürer & Jan Philipp Nolte, 2024. "An Improved Inferential Procedure to Evaluate Item Discriminations in a Conditional Maximum Likelihood Framework," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(3), pages 403-430, June.
    12. Carolin Strobl & Julia Kopf & Achim Zeileis, 2015. "Rasch Trees: A New Method for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 289-316, June.
    13. Anja C. Rohenkohl & Monika Bullinger & Andreas M. Pleil & Levente Kriston & Julia H. Quitmann, 2016. "A Brief Version of the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Questionnaire - the QoLISSY-Brief," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(4), pages 971-984, December.
    14. Roberto Burro & Riccardo Sartori & Giulio Vidotto, 2011. "The method of constant stimuli with three rating categories and the use of Rasch models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 43-58, January.
    15. P. A. Ferrari & S. Salini, 2008. "Measuring Service Quality: The Opinion of Europeans about Utilities," Working Papers 2008.36, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Chang, Hsin-Li & Yang, Cheng-Hua, 2008. "Explore airlines’ brand niches through measuring passengers’ repurchase motivation—an application of Rasch measurement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 105-112.
    17. Ivana Bassi & Matteo Carzedda & Enrico Gori & Luca Iseppi, 2022. "Rasch analysis of consumer attitudes towards the mountain product label," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Antonio Caronni & Marina Ramella & Pietro Arcuri & Claudia Salatino & Lucia Pigini & Maurizio Saruggia & Chiara Folini & Stefano Scarano & Rosa Maria Converti, 2023. "The Rasch Analysis Shows Poor Construct Validity and Low Reliability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Hua-Hua Chang, 1996. "The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait for polytomous IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 445-463, September.
    20. Curt Hagquist & Raili Välimaa & Nina Simonsen & Sakari Suominen, 2017. "Differential Item Functioning in Trend Analyses of Adolescent Mental Health – Illustrative Examples Using HBSC-Data from Finland," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(3), pages 673-691, September.
    21. Edward Ip & Yuchung Wang & Paul Boeck & Michel Meulders, 2004. "Locally dependent latent trait model for polytomous responses with application to inventory of hostility," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 191-216, June.
    22. Chen-Wei Liu & R Philip Chalmers, 2018. "Fitting item response unfolding models to Likert-scale data using mirt in R," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:9:p:10329-10351:d:54756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.