IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5103-d552685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from Disability Counting in Ecuador, with a Contribution from Primary Health Care

Author

Listed:
  • Inge Debrouwere

    (Fundación Tapori Paladines de la Felicidad, Quito 170308, Ecuador)

  • Pedro Celestino Álvarez Vera

    (Fundación Tapori Paladines de la Felicidad, Quito 170308, Ecuador
    Department of Psychology, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana—Sede Quito, Quito 170308, Ecuador)

  • Ximena del Carmen Pavón Benítez

    (Fundación Tapori Paladines de la Felicidad, Quito 170308, Ecuador)

  • Celia Katherine Rosero Arboleda

    (Fundación Tapori Paladines de la Felicidad, Quito 170308, Ecuador
    Teaching Department, Hospital Voz Andes Quito, Quito 170308, Ecuador)

  • Peter Prinzie

    (Dominiek Savio Institute, Dienstencentrum GID(t)S, 8830 Hooglede-Gits, Belgium
    Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Jo Lebeer

    (Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Family Medicine & Population Health, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium)

Abstract

Disability data are essential for policy. Yet, the predominant use of disability prevalence for service planning reflects dichotomous counting, increasingly less compatible with current disability thinking. Difficulties relate to variations in rates, the lack of matching with needs, and the use of prevalence to compare disability situations. From the perspective of Primary Health Care (PHC), we explore methods for disability counting regarding the usefulness of prevalences in identifying persons with disabilities and meeting their needs with local service implementation. First, we analyze the methods and results of six national cross-sectional studies in Ecuador. Then, we present a case about an exploratory needs-driven method for disability counting in a local PHC setting. The analysis of variations in rates focuses the attention on reasons for and risks of a priori exclusion of persons with disabilities from services. Longitudinal disability counting as a collateral result of meeting needs in the PHC setting yields local disability data worthy of further exploration. Thinking about disability counting from a PHC scope in a developing country prompted reflection on the comparison of prevalences to evaluate disability situations. Findings invite further exploration of the needs-driven counting method, its contributions to planning local services, and complementarity with cross-sectional disability counting.

Suggested Citation

  • Inge Debrouwere & Pedro Celestino Álvarez Vera & Ximena del Carmen Pavón Benítez & Celia Katherine Rosero Arboleda & Peter Prinzie & Jo Lebeer, 2021. "Lessons from Disability Counting in Ecuador, with a Contribution from Primary Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5103-:d:552685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean‐Francois Trani & Mitchell Loeb, 2012. "Poverty and disability: A vicious circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24, pages 19-52, January.
    2. Beth Sprunt & Barbara McPake & Manjula Marella, 2019. "The UNICEF/Washington Group Child Functioning Module—Accuracy, Inter-Rater Reliability and Cut-Off Level for Disability Disaggregation of Fiji’s Education Management Information System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Carla Sabariego & Cornelia Oberhauser & Aleksandra Posarac & Jerome Bickenbach & Nenad Kostanjsek & Somnath Chatterji & Alana Officer & Michaela Coenen & Lay Chhan & Alarcos Cieza, 2015. "Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Katherine R. Sorsdahl & Ritsuko Kakuma & Zane Wilson & Dan J. Stein, 2012. "The internalized stigma experienced by members of a mental health advocacy group in South Africa," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(1), pages 55-61, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwok Ng & Piritta Asunta & Niko Leppä & Pauli Rintala, 2020. "Intra-Rater Test-Retest Reliability of a Modified Child Functioning Module, Self-Report Version," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Islay Mactaggart & Lena Morgon Banks & Hannah Kuper & G V S Murthy & Jayanthi Sagar & Joseph Oye & Sarah Polack, 2018. "Livelihood opportunities amongst adults with and without disabilities in Cameroon and India: A case control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Raymond Lang & Marguerite Schneider & Maria Kett & Ellie Cole & Nora Groce, 2019. "Policy development: An analysis of disability inclusion in a selection of African Union policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(2), pages 155-175, March.
    4. Flores, Gabriela & Ingenhaag, Michael & Maurer, Jürgen, 2015. "An anatomy of old-age disability: Time use, affect and experienced utility," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 150-160.
    5. Rafi Amir-ud-Din & Faisal Abbas & Sajid Amin Javed, 2018. "Poverty as Functioning Deprivation: Global Estimates," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 1077-1108, December.
    6. Ashrita Saran & Howard White & Hannah Kuper, 2020. "Evidence and gap map of studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for people with disabilities in low‐and middle‐income countries," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    7. Ute Rink & Theresa Rollwage, 2022. "Household disability and time preferences: Evidence from incentivized experiments in Vietnam," TVSEP Working Papers wp-027, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Project TVSEP.
    8. Jennifer H. Madans & Daniel Mont & Mitchell Loeb, 2015. "Comments on Sabariego et al . Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health , 2015, 12 , 10329–10351," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, December.
    9. Jeyapraba Suresh, 2023. "Poverty is Lack of Capabilities: A Literature Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(3), pages 462-476, March.
    10. Derek Asuman & Charles Godfred Ackah & Frank Agyire-Tettey, 2021. "Disability and Household Welfare in Ghana: Costs and Correlates," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 633-649, December.
    11. Eun-Young Park & Su-Jung Nam, 2018. "Influential Factors of Poverty Dynamics among Korean Households that Include the Aged with Disability," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 317-331, June.
    12. Alex Robinson & Liem Nguyen & Fleur Smith, 2021. "Use of the Washington Group Questions in Non-Government Programming," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Trani, Jean-François & Cannings, Tim I., 2013. "Child Poverty in an Emergency and Conflict Context: A Multidimensional Profile and an Identification of the Poorest Children in Western Darfur," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 48-70.
    14. Marja Eliisa Holm & Päivi Sainio & Jaana Suvisaari & Katri Sääksjärvi & Tuija Jääskeläinen & Suvi Parikka & Seppo Koskinen, 2022. "Differences in Unfavorable Lifestyle Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic between People with and without Disabilities in Finland: Psychological Distress as a Mediator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Lena Morgon Banks & Hannah Kuper & Sarah Polack, 2017. "Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Andrew Griffiths & Stevens Bechange & Hannah Loryman & Chris Iga & Elena Schmidt, 2020. "How Do Legal and Policy Frameworks Support Employment of People With Disabilities in Uganda? Findings From a Qualitative Policy Analysis Study," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1360-1378, November.
    17. Jerome E. Bickenbach & Alarcos Cieza & Carla Sabariego, 2016. "Disability and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, January.
    18. Daniel Mont & Cuong Nguyen, 2018. "Spatial Variation in the Poverty Gap Between People With and Without Disabilities: Evidence from Vietnam," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 745-763, June.
    19. Ivana Ivandic & Kaloyan Kamenov & Diego Rojas & Gloria Cerón & Dennis Nowak & Carla Sabariego, 2017. "Determinants of Work Performance in Workers with Depression and Anxiety: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, April.
    20. Igei, Kengo, 2017. "Untangling Disability and Poverty: A Matching Approach Using Large-scale Data in South Africa," Working Papers 142, JICA Research Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5103-:d:552685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.