IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i4p4292-4305d48388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS Analysis of Changes in Ecological Vulnerability Using a SPCA Model in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China

Author

Listed:
  • Kang Hou

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi'an Jiao tong University, Xi'an, 710049, China)

  • Xuxiang Li

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi'an Jiao tong University, Xi'an, 710049, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi'an Jiao tong University, Xi'an, 710049, China)

Abstract

Changes in ecological vulnerability were analyzed for Northern Shaanxi, China using a geographic information system (GIS). An evaluation model was developed using a spatial principal component analysis (SPCA) model containing land use, soil erosion, topography, climate, vegetation and social economy variables. Using this model, an ecological vulnerability index was computed for the research region. Using natural breaks classification (NBC), the evaluation results were divided into five types: potential, slight, light, medium and heavy. The results indicate that there is greater than average optimism about the conditions of the study region, and the ecological vulnerability index (EVI) of the southern eight counties is lower than that of the northern twelve counties. From 1997 to 2011, the ecological vulnerability index gradually decreased, which means that environmental security was gradually enhanced, although there are still some places that have gradually deteriorated over the past 15 years. In the study area, government and economic factors and precipitation are the main reasons for the changes in ecological vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang Hou & Xuxiang Li & Jing Zhang, 2015. "GIS Analysis of Changes in Ecological Vulnerability Using a SPCA Model in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:4292-4305:d:48388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/4/4292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/4/4292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hezri, Adnan A. & Dovers, Stephen R., 2006. "Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 86-99, November.
    2. Luc Anselin & Sergio J. Rey, 2010. "Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Sergio J. Rey (ed.), Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis, chapter 0, pages 1-20, Springer.
    3. Luc Anselin & Arthur Getis, 2010. "Spatial Statistical Analysis and Geographic Information Systems," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Sergio J. Rey (ed.), Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis, chapter 0, pages 35-47, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Zhang & Yue Chang & Kanhua Yu & Liyuan Zhang & Xuxiang Li, 2021. "Difference Analysis of Ecological Vulnerability and Zoning Changes of National Energy and Chemical Bases Using FAHP Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Chunsheng Wu & Gaohuan Liu & Chong Huang & Qingsheng Liu & Xudong Guan, 2018. "Ecological Vulnerability Assessment Based on Fuzzy Analytical Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process in Yellow River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunak, Yasin & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "The impact of wind farm visibility on property values: A spatial difference-in-differences analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 79-91.
    2. Schmidtner, Eva & Lippert, Christian & Dabbert, Stephan, 2015. "Does Spatial Dependence Depend on Spatial Resolution? – An Empirical Analysis of Organic Farming in Southern Germany," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(03), September.
    3. Stefania Bertazzon & Rizwan Shahid, 2017. "Schools, Air Pollution, and Active Transportation: An Exploratory Spatial Analysis of Calgary, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Yaqing Liu & Hongbing Ouyang & Xiaolu Wei, 2021. "A Spatial Panel Structural Vector Autoregressive Model with Interactive Effects and Its Simulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-8, April.
    5. F. Marta L. Di Lascio & Andrea Menapace & Roberta Pappadà, 2024. "A spatially‐weighted AMH copula‐based dissimilarity measure for clustering variables: An application to urban thermal efficiency," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    6. Sunak, Yasin & Madlener, Reinhard, 2012. "The Impact of Wind Farms on Property Values: A Geographically Weighted Hedonic Pricing Model," FCN Working Papers 3/2012, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised Mar 2013.
    7. John I. Carruthers & Selma Hepp & Gerrit-Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2012. "The American Way of Land Use," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(3), pages 267-302, July.
    8. Oumarou Zallé & Idrissa M. Ouédraogo, 2021. "Spillover effects of corruption and democracy on territorial attractiveness of foreign direct investment in sub‐Saharan Africa," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(4), pages 756-769, December.
    9. Nijkamp Peter, 2012. "Behaviour of Humans and Behaviour of Models in Dynamic Space," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 31(2), pages 7-19, June.
    10. Silvio Franco & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella, 2021. "Mapping National Environmental Sustainability Distribution by Ecological Footprint: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Friederike Behr & Gero Oertzen & Manuel Dienst, 2021. "Managing Sustainability and Carbon-Neutrality in the Public Administration—Case Report of a German State Institution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Ye, Xinyue & Yue, Wenze, 2014. "Comparative analysis of regional development: Exploratory space-time data analysis and open source implementation," Economics Discussion Papers 2014-20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. David Wittstruck & Frank Teuteberg, 2012. "Understanding the Success Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Empirical Evidence from the Electrics and Electronics Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 141-158, May.
    14. Manuel Laranja & Nuno Boavida, 2012. "The use of indicators and evidence in governance and policy development of Science, Technology and Innovation," IET Working Papers Series 07/2012, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology.
    15. Castellani, V. & Sala, S., 2010. "Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 871-880.
    16. Kajsa Borgnäs, 2017. "Indicators as ‘circular argumentation constructs’? An input–output analysis of the variable structure of five environmental sustainability country rankings," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 769-790, June.
    17. Ludger Niemann & Thomas Hoppe, 2021. "How to Sustain Sustainability Monitoring in Cities: Lessons from 49 Community Indicator Initiatives across 10 Latin American Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.
    18. repec:iab:iabjlr:v:55:i::p:art.11 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Richard R. Shaker & Joseph Aversa & Victoria Papp & Bryant M. Serre & Brian R. Mackay, 2020. "Showcasing Relationships between Neighborhood Design and Wellbeing Toronto Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Jose A. Salinas-Perez & Esteban Ruiz-Ballesteros & Auxiliadora González-Portillo, 2024. "Analysis of the funding of social services from a spatial approach in Andalusia (Spain)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    21. Alptekin Durmuşoğlu, 2017. "Effects of Clean Air Act on Patenting Activities in Chemical Industry: Learning from Past Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:4292-4305:d:48388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.