IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i1p595-610d44553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Risk Assessment for Exposure to Benzene in Petroleum Refinery Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Edokpolo

    (Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

  • Qiming Jimmy Yu

    (Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

  • Des Connell

    (Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

Abstract

The health risk resulting from benzene exposure in petroleum refineries was calculated using data from the scientific literature from various countries throughout the world. The exposure data was collated into four scenarios from petroleum refinery environments and plotted as cumulative probability distributions (CPD) plots. Health risk was evaluated for each scenario using the Hazard Quotient (HQ) at 50% (C EXP50 ) and 95% (C EXP95 ) exposure levels. Benzene levels were estimated to pose a significant risk with HQ 50 > 1 and HQ 95 > 1 for workers exposed to benzene as base estimates for petroleum refinery workers (Scenario 1), petroleum refinery workers evaluated with personal samplers in Bulgarian refineries (Scenario 2B) and evaluated using air inside petroleum refineries in Bulgarian refineries (Scenario 3B). HQ 50 < 1 were calculated for petroleum refinery workers with personal samplers in Italian refineries (Scenario 2A), air inside petroleum refineries (Scenario 3A) and air outside petroleum refineries (Scenario 4) in India and Taiwan indicating little possible adverse health effects. Also, HQ 95 was < 1 for Scenario 4 however potential risk was evaluated for Scenarios 2A and 3A with HQ 95 > 1. The excess Cancer risk (CR) for lifetime exposure to benzene for all the scenarios was evaluated using the Slope Factor and Overall Risk Probability (ORP) methods. The result suggests a potential cancer risk for exposure to benzene in all the scenarios. However, there is a higher cancer risk at 95% (C EXP95 ) for petroleum refinery workers (2B) with a CR of 48,000 per 10 6 and exposure to benzene in air inside petroleum refineries (3B) with a CR of 28,000 per 10 6 .

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Edokpolo & Qiming Jimmy Yu & Des Connell, 2015. "Health Risk Assessment for Exposure to Benzene in Petroleum Refinery Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:1:p:595-610:d:44553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/1/595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/1/595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Edokpolo & Qiming Jimmy Yu & Des Connell, 2014. "Health Risk Assessment of Ambient Air Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene and Xylene (BTX) in Service Station Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tapani Tuomi & Henna Veijalainen & Tiina Santonen, 2018. "Managing Exposure to Benzene and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons at Two Oil Refineries 1977–2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Nerlis Pajaro-Castro & Karina Caballero-Gallardo & Jesus Olivero-Verbel, 2017. "Toxicity of Naphthalene and Benzene on Tribollium castaneum Herbst," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Sunisa Chaiklieng & Pornnapa Suggaravetsiri & Herman Autrup, 2019. "Risk Assessment on Benzene Exposure among Gasoline Station Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-9, July.
    4. Xue Bai & Kai Song & Jian Liu & Adam Khalifa Mohamed & Chenya Mou & Dan Liu, 2019. "Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater Contaminated by Oil Pollutants Based on Numerical Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Mei Wang & Deyang Kong & Lang Liu & Guoming Wen & Fan Zhang, 2024. "In Situ Conductive Heating for Thermal Desorption of Volatile Organic-Contaminated Soil Based on Solar Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Masilu Daniel Masekameni & Raeesa Moolla & Mary Gulumian & Derk Brouwer, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene Concentrations from the Combustion of Coal in a Controlled Laboratory Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunisa Chaiklieng & Pornnapa Suggaravetsiri & Herman Autrup, 2019. "Risk Assessment on Benzene Exposure among Gasoline Station Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Masilu Daniel Masekameni & Raeesa Moolla & Mary Gulumian & Derk Brouwer, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene Concentrations from the Combustion of Coal in a Controlled Laboratory Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Kristal Pech & Norma Pérez-Herrera & Ángel Antonio Vértiz-Hernández & Martín Lajous & Paulina Farías, 2023. "Health Risk Assessment in Children Occupationally and Para-Occupationally Exposed to Benzene Using a Reverse-Translation PBPK Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Raeesa Moolla & Christopher J. Curtis & Jasper Knight, 2015. "Occupational Exposure of Diesel Station Workers to BTEX Compounds at a Bus Depot," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:1:p:595-610:d:44553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.