IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i11p14780-14799d59086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pooling Bio-Specimens in the Presence of Measurement Error and Non-Linearity in Dose-Response: Simulation Study in the Context of a Birth Cohort Investigating Risk Factors for Autism Spectrum Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Karyn Heavner

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Craig Newschaffer

    (A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Irva Hertz-Picciotto

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Deborah Bennett

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Igor Burstyn

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

Abstract

We sought to determine the potential effects of pooling on power, false positive rate (FPR), and bias of the estimated associations between hypothetical environmental exposures and dichotomous autism spectrum disorders (ASD) status. Simulated birth cohorts in which ASD outcome was assumed to have been ascertained with uncertainty were created. We investigated the impact on the power of the analysis (using logistic regression) to detect true associations with exposure (X 1 ) and the FPR for a non-causal correlate of exposure (X 2 , r = 0.7) for a dichotomized ASD measure when the pool size, sample size, degree of measurement error variance in exposure, strength of the true association, and shape of the exposure-response curve varied. We found that there was minimal change (bias) in the measures of association for the main effect (X 1 ). There is some loss of power but there is less chance of detecting a false positive result for pooled compared to individual level models. The number of pools had more effect on the power and FPR than the overall sample size. This study supports the use of pooling to reduce laboratory costs while maintaining statistical efficiency in scenarios similar to the simulated prospective risk-enriched ASD cohort.

Suggested Citation

  • Karyn Heavner & Craig Newschaffer & Irva Hertz-Picciotto & Deborah Bennett & Igor Burstyn, 2015. "Pooling Bio-Specimens in the Presence of Measurement Error and Non-Linearity in Dose-Response: Simulation Study in the Context of a Birth Cohort Investigating Risk Factors for Autism Spectrum Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:11:p:14780-14799:d:59086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/11/14780/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/11/14780/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clarice R. Weinberg & David M. Umbach, 1999. "Using Pooled Exposure Assessment to Improve Efficiency in Case-Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 718-726, September.
    2. Karyn Heavner & Igor Burstyn, 2015. "A Simulation Study of Categorizing Continuous Exposure Variables Measured with Error in Autism Research: Small Changes with Large Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, August.
    3. Emily M. Mitchell & Robert H. Lyles & Amita K. Manatunga & Michelle Danaher & Neil J. Perkins & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2014. "Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 202-211, March.
    4. Igor Burstyn & Jonathan W. Martin & Sanjay Beesoon & Fiona Bamforth & Qiaozhi Li & Yutaka Yasui & Nicola M. Cherry, 2013. "Maternal Exposure to Bisphenol-A and Fetal Growth Restriction: A Case-Referent Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Hae-Young Kim & Michael G. Hudgens & Jonathan M. Dreyfuss & Daniel J. Westreich & Christopher D. Pilcher, 2007. "Comparison of Group Testing Algorithms for Case Identification in the Presence of Test Error," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1152-1163, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Dewei & McMahan, Christopher S. & Tebbs, Joshua M. & Bilder, Christopher R., 2018. "Group testing case identification with biomarker information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 156-166.
    2. Robert H. Lyles & Dane Van Domelen & Emily M. Mitchell & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2015. "A Discriminant Function Approach to Adjust for Processing and Measurement Error When a Biomarker is Assayed in Pooled Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Hae-Young Kim & Michael G. Hudgens, 2009. "Three-Dimensional Array-Based Group Testing Algorithms," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 903-910, September.
    4. Mou, Xichen & Wang, Dewei, 2024. "Additive partially linear model for pooled biomonitoring data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Emily M. Mitchell & Robert H. Lyles & Amita K. Manatunga & Michelle Danaher & Neil J. Perkins & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2014. "Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 202-211, March.
    6. Hrayer Aprahamian & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2020. "Optimal Group Testing: Structural Properties and Robust Solutions, with Application to Public Health Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 895-911, October.
    7. Hrayer Aprahamian & Hadi El-Amine, 2022. "Optimal Screening of Populations with Heterogeneous Risk Profiles Under the Availability of Multiple Tests," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 150-164, January.
    8. Md S. Warasi & Laura L. Hungerford & Kevin Lahmers, 2022. "Optimizing Pooled Testing for Estimating the Prevalence of Multiple Diseases," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 713-727, December.
    9. Xianzheng Huang & Md Shamim Sarker Warasi, 2017. "Maximum Likelihood Estimators in Regression Models for Error-prone Group Testing Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 918-931, December.
    10. Hussein El Hajj & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish & Denise M. Kay, 2022. "Novel Pooling Strategies for Genetic Testing, with Application to Newborn Screening," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7994-8014, November.
    11. Zhiwei Zhang & Paul S. Albert, 2011. "Binary Regression Analysis with Pooled Exposure Measurements: A Regression Calibration Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 636-645, June.
    12. Peng Chen & Joshua M. Tebbs & Christopher R. Bilder, 2009. "Group Testing Regression Models with Fixed and Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1270-1278, December.
    13. Haoran Jiang & Hongshik Ahn & Xiaolin Li, 2022. "Group Testing with Consideration of the Dilution Effect," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Xinlei Zuo & Juan Ding & Junjian Zhang & Wenjun Xiong, 2024. "Nonparametric Additive Regression for High-Dimensional Group Testing Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Hrayer Aprahamian & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2019. "Optimal Risk-Based Group Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4365-4384, September.
    16. Samuel D. Lendle & Michael G. Hudgens & Bahjat F. Qaqish, 2012. "Group Testing for Case Identification with Correlated Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 532-540, June.
    17. David Hong & Rounak Dey & Xihong Lin & Brian Cleary & Edgar Dobriban, 2022. "Group testing via hypergraph factorization applied to COVID-19," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Christopher S. McMahan & Joshua M. Tebbs & Timothy E. Hanson & Christopher R. Bilder, 2017. "Bayesian regression for group testing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1443-1452, December.
    19. Christopher S. McMahan & Joshua M. Tebbs & Christopher R. Bilder, 2012. "Informative Dorfman Screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 287-296, March.
    20. Yaakov Malinovsky & Paul S. Albert & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2012. "Pooling Designs for Outcomes under a Gaussian Random Effects Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 45-52, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:11:p:14780-14799:d:59086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.