IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i2p1594-1604d32647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability, Validity, and Significance of Assessment of Sense of Contribution in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Jiro Takaki

    (Department of Public Health and Occupational Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan)

  • Toshiyo Taniguchi

    (Department of Welfare System and Health Science, Okayama Prefectural University, 111 Kuboki Soja, Okayama 719-1197, Japan)

  • Yasuhito Fujii

    (Department of Welfare System and Health Science, Okayama Prefectural University, 111 Kuboki Soja, Okayama 719-1197, Japan)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Sense of Contribution Scale (SCS), a newly developed, 7-item questionnaire used to measure sense of contribution in the workplace. Workers at 272 organizations answered questionnaires that included the SCS. Because of non-participation or missing data, the number of subjects included in the analyses for internal consistency and validity varied from 1,675 to 2,462 (response rates 54.6%–80.2%). Fifty-four workers were included in the analysis of test–retest reliability (response rate, 77.1%). The SCS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficients in men and women were 0.85 and 0.86, respectively) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91). Significant ( p < 0.001), positive, moderate correlations were found between the SCS score and scores for organization-based self-esteem and work engagement in both genders, which support the SCS’s convergent and discriminant validity. The criterion validity of the SCS was supported by the finding that in both genders, the SCS scores were significantly ( p < 0.05) and inversely associated with psychological distress and sleep disturbance in crude and in multivariable analyses that adjusted for demographics, organization-based self-esteem, work engagement, effort–reward ratio, workplace bullying, and procedural and interactional justice. The SCS is a psychometrically satisfactory measure of sense of contribution in the workplace. The SCS provides a new and useful instrument to measure sense of contribution, which is independently associated with mental health in workers, for studies in organizational science, occupational health psychology and occupational medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiro Takaki & Toshiyo Taniguchi & Yasuhito Fujii, 2014. "Reliability, Validity, and Significance of Assessment of Sense of Contribution in the Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:1594-1604:d:32647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/1594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/1594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tara L. Gruenewald & Arun S. Karlamangla & Gail A. Greendale & Burton H. Singer & Teresa E. Seeman, 2007. "Feelings of Usefulness to Others, Disability, and Mortality in Older Adults: The MacArthur Study of Successful Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(1), pages 28-37.
    2. Kazushi Okamoto & Yuko Tanaka, 2004. "Subjective Usefulness and 6-Year Mortality Risks Among Elderly Persons in Japan," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(5), pages 246-249.
    3. Grand, A. & Grosclaude, P. & Bocquet, H. & Pous, J. & Albarede, J.L., 1988. "Predictive value of life events, psychosocial factors and self-rated health on disability in an elderly rural French population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 1337-1342, January.
    4. Elovainio, M. & Kivimäki, M. & Vahtera, J., 2002. "Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(1), pages 105-108.
    5. Tsutsumi, Akizumi & Kawakami, Norito, 2004. "A review of empirical studies on the model of effort-reward imbalance at work: reducing occupational stress by implementing a new theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(11), pages 2335-2359, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiro Takaki & Toshiyo Taniguchi & Yasuhito Fujii, 2016. "Confirmation of Maslow’s Hypothesis of Synergy: Developing an Acceptance of Selfishness at the Workplace Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Molli R. Grossman & Diana Wang & Tara L. Gruenewald, 2019. "Variations in Daily Cognitive Affective States as a Function of Variations in Daily Generative Activity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 19-34, January.
    2. Okun, Morris A. & August, Kristin J. & Rook, Karen S. & Newsom, Jason T., 2010. "Does volunteering moderate the relation between functional limitations and mortality?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(9), pages 1662-1668, November.
    3. Oshio, Takashi & Inoue, Akiomi & Tsutsumi, Akizumi, 2012. "Does workplace social capital moderate the associations between job stressors and psychological distress? A cross-sectional analysis among Japanese workers," CIS Discussion paper series 575, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Trine Filges & Anu Siren & Torben Fridberg & Bjørn C. V. Nielsen, 2020. "Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    5. McCluney, Courtney L. & Schmitz, Lauren L. & Hicken, Margaret T. & Sonnega, Amanda, 2018. "Structural racism in the workplace: Does perception matter for health inequalities?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 106-114.
    6. Chao Wang & Shuang Li & Tao Li & Shanfa Yu & Junming Dai & Xiaoman Liu & Xiaojun Zhu & Yuqing Ji & Jin Wang, 2016. "Using the Job Burden-Capital Model of Occupational Stress to Predict Depression and Well-Being among Electronic Manufacturing Service Employees in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Levine, Cynthia S. & Miller, Gregory E. & Shalowitz, Madeleine U. & Story, Rachel E. & Manczak, Erika M. & Hayen, Robin & Hoffer, Lauren C. & Le, Van & Vause, Katherine J. & Chen, Edith, 2019. "Academic disparities and health: How gender-based disparities in schools relate to boys' and girls’ health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 126-134.
    8. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    9. Trujillo Flores Mara Maricela & Rivas Tovar Luis Arturo & Lambarry Vilchis Fernando, 2014. "Mobbing: A theoretical model quantifying factors affecting the role of women executives in the institutions of public education in Mexico," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 59(1), pages 195-228, enero-mar.
    10. Heponiemi, Tarja & Manderbacka, Kristiina & Vänskä, Jukka & Elovainio, Marko, 2013. "Can organizational justice help the retention of general practitioners?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 22-28.
    11. Robert Giacalone & Mark Promislo, 2010. "Unethical and Unwell: Decrements in Well-Being and Unethical Activity at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 275-297, January.
    12. Guillaume Soenen & Tessa Melkonian & Maureen L. Ambrose, 2017. "To Shift or Not to Shift? : Determinants and Consequences of Phase-Shifting on Justice Judgments," Post-Print hal-02276701, HAL.
    13. Cokkie Verschuren & Maria Tims & Annet H. De Lange, 2023. "Beyond Bullying, Aggression, Discrimination, and Social Safety: Development of an Integrated Negative Work Behavior Questionnaire (INWBQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Henseke, Golo, 2011. "Retirement effects of heavy job demands," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 118, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    15. Yumiko Kobayashi & Naoki Kondo, 2019. "Organizational justice, psychological distress, and stress-related behaviors by occupational class in female Japanese employees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Shor, Eran & Roelfs, David J., 2015. "Social contact frequency and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis and meta-regression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 76-86.
    17. Martin Gächter & David A. Savage & Benno Torgler, 2009. "Gender Variations of Physiolocical and Psychological Stress Among Police Officers," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-27, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    18. Erebouni Arakelian & Sofia Paulsson & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "How Human Resources Index, Relational Justice, and Perceived Productivity Change after Reorganization at a Hospital in Sweden That Uses a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Manag," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Siegrist, Johannes & Shackelton, Rebecca & Link, Carol & Marceau, Lisa & von dem Knesebeck, Olaf & McKinlay, John, 2010. "Work stress of primary care physicians in the US, UK and German health care systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 298-304, July.
    20. Elena Christina Schreibauer & Melina Hippler & Stephanie Burgess & Monika A. Rieger & Esther Rind, 2020. "Work-Related Psychosocial Stress in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:1594-1604:d:32647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.