IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgeogr/v2y2022i2p11-172d777583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City Living: Nest-Site Selection Preferences in Urban Herring Gulls, Larus argentatus

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlin Dalla Pria

    (Department of Geography, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland)

  • Fiona Cawkwell

    (Department of Geography, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland)

  • Stephen Newton

    (BirdWatch Ireland, A63 RW83 Kilcoole, Ireland)

  • Paul Holloway

    (Department of Geography, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland)

Abstract

Herring gulls ( Larus argentatus ) are declining globally, but there are populations who are taking advantage of the new foraging and nesting opportunities afforded to them by urban landscapes. Nest-site selection (NSS) in urban environs is understudied, despite its critical role in supporting planning policy, biodiversity conservation and the management of human–wildlife conflict. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of anthropogenic habitat features to NSS in urban populations of L. argentatus at different hierarchical levels in Fingal County, Ireland. We used generalised linear models with a logit function to investigate the relationship among nest sites, building features, street furniture (i.e., streetlights and refuse bins), landscape features, and presence of conspecifics at three different hierarchical levels, including the county, town, and colony levels. L. argentatus preferentially chose buildings that were closer to streetlights and food sources at the colony level, while avoiding streetlights when considered in isolation. Conspecific attraction at the county and colony levels indicated that individuals avoided neighbouring nest sites, yet this relationship was inverted at the town level, suggesting preference. Moreover, 75% of nests were within 30 m of each other (the average road width in the study area) when measured at the county level. Various relationships with different food sources were identified, suggesting within-population variation among preferences for nest sites. There appears to be a substantial population variation among preferences for nest sites, which does appear to be driven by the cross-scale decisions involved in nest-site selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlin Dalla Pria & Fiona Cawkwell & Stephen Newton & Paul Holloway, 2022. "City Living: Nest-Site Selection Preferences in Urban Herring Gulls, Larus argentatus," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:11-172:d:777583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/2/2/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/2/2/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Neumann & Athanasios T Vafeidis & Juliane Zimmermann & Robert J Nicholls, 2015. "Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding - A Global Assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Stéphane Thériault & Marc-André Villard & Samuel Haché, 2012. "Habitat selection in site-faithful ovenbirds and recruits in the absence of experimental attraction," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1289-1295.
    3. Luke Lambert & Fiona Cawkwell & Paul Holloway, 2021. "The Importance of Connected and Interspersed Urban Green and Blue Space for Biodiversity: A Case Study in Cork City, Ireland," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Ryan Hastings & Valerie Cummins & Paul Holloway, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Physical and Anthropogenic Environmental Factors in Determining the Habitat Suitability of Seagrass Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Paul Holloway & Richard Field, 2020. "Can Rock-Rubble Groynes Support Similar Intertidal Ecological Communities to Natural Rocky Shores?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Hastings & Valerie Cummins & Paul Holloway, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Physical and Anthropogenic Environmental Factors in Determining the Habitat Suitability of Seagrass Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Anirban Mukhopadhyay & Sugata Hazra & Debasish Mitra & C. Hutton & Abhra Chanda & Sandip Mukherjee, 2016. "Characterizing the multi-risk with respect to plausible natural hazards in the Balasore coast, Odisha, India: a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) appraisal," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1495-1513, February.
    3. Domingues, Rita & Costas, Susana & Jesus, Saul & Ferreira, Óscar, 2017. "SENSE OF PLACE, RISK PERCEPTIONS AND PREPAREDNESS OF A COASTAL POPULATION AT RISK (Faro Beach, Portugal): A qualitative content analysis," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 5(3), pages 163-175.
    4. Joseph L.-H. Tsui & Rosario Evans Pena & Monika Moir & Rhys P. D. Inward & Eduan Wilkinson & James Emmanuel San & Jenicca Poongavanan & Sumali Bajaj & Bernardo Gutierrez & Abhishek Dasgupta & Tulio Ol, 2024. "Impacts of climate change-related human migration on infectious diseases," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(8), pages 793-802, August.
    5. Zhibin Yang & Robert Stachler & Joshua S. Heyne, 2020. "Orthogonal Reference Surrogate Fuels for Operability Testing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    6. D. J. Rasmussen & Scott Kulp & Robert E. Kopp & Michael Oppenheimer & Benjamin H. Strauss, 2022. "Popular extreme sea level metrics can better communicate impacts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Maria Fabrizia Clemente, 2022. "The Future Impacts of ESL Events in Euro-Mediterranean Coastal Cities: The Coast-RiskBySea Model to Assess the Potential Economic Damages in Naples, Marseille and Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Tian Liu & Peijun Shi & Jian Fang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal variation in global floods with different affected areas and the contribution of influencing factors to flood-induced mortality (1985–2019)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2601-2625, April.
    9. Paul A. Sandifer & Alexander S. Braud & Landon C. Knapp & Judith Taylor, 2021. "Is Living in a U.S. Coastal City Good for One’s Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Rebecca Jo Stormes Newman & Claudia Capitani & Colin Courtney-Mustaphi & Jessica Paula Rose Thorn & Rebecca Kariuki & Charis Enns & Robert Marchant, 2020. "Integrating Insights from Social-Ecological Interactions into Sustainable Land Use Change Scenarios for Small Islands in the Western Indian Ocean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Martins Fernando L.C. & Giordano Fabio & Barrella Walter, 2021. "Socio-Environmental Vulnerability of Water in the Estuary of the Metropolitan Region of Santos (Brazil)," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 40(4), pages 113-125, December.
    12. Avit K. Bhowmik & Rajchandar Padmanaban & Pedro Cabral & Maria M. Romeiras, 2022. "Global Mangrove Deforestation and Its Interacting Social-Ecological Drivers: A Systematic Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Sanchayan Nath & Frank van Laerhoven & Peter P. J. Driessen, 2019. "Have Bangladesh’s Polders Decreased Livelihood Vulnerability? A Comparative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Leonid Sorokin & Gérard Mondello, 2015. "Sea Level Rise, Radical Uncertainties and Decision-Maker’s Liability: The European Coastal Airports Case," Working Papers hal-01251476, HAL.
    15. Laura Bakkensen & Quynh Nguyen & Toan Phan & Paul Schuler, 2023. "Charting the Course: How Does Information about Sea Level Rise Affect the Willingness to Migrate?," Working Paper 23-09, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    16. Sarah F. W. Taylor & Michael J. Roberts & Ben Milligan & Ronney Ncwadi, 2019. "Measurement and implications of marine food security in the Western Indian Ocean: an impending crisis?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(6), pages 1395-1415, December.
    17. R. Dean Hardy & Bryan L. Nuse, 2016. "Global sea-level rise: weighing country responsibility and risk," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 333-345, August.
    18. Kevin C. Hanegan & Duncan M. FitzGerald & Ioannis Y. Georgiou & Zoe J. Hughes, 2023. "Long-term sea level rise modeling of a basin-tidal inlet system reveals sediment sinks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Domingues, Rita & Costas, Susana & Neves Jesus, Saul & Ferreira, Óscar, 2019. "Assessing stakeholders’ risk perceptions in a vulnerable coastal tourism destination (Faro beach, Southern Portugal)," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 7(1), pages 22-38.
    20. Xuchao Yang & Lin Lin & Yizhe Zhang & Tingting Ye & Qian Chen & Cheng Jin & Guanqiong Ye, 2019. "Spatially Explicit Assessment of Social Vulnerability in Coastal China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:11-172:d:777583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.