IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v7y2015i1p26-49d45465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aspects to Be Considered when Implementing Technology-Enhanced Learning Approaches: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Schweighofer

    (Information Technologies & Business Informatics, CAMPUS 02 University of Applied Science, Körblergasse 126, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Martin Ebner

    (Social Learning, Graz University of Technology, Münzgrabenstraße 35A/I, 8010 Graz, Austria)

Abstract

The significance of approaches to technology-enhanced learning (TEL) has increased rapidly during the last few years. Nowadays in education different approaches such as game-based learning, web-based learning, video-based online courses, and many others are used on a daily basis. However, what defines the success of technology-enhanced learning approaches and how can such approaches be developed in a structured way? Furthermore, what different aspects have to be considered while doing so? To answer these questions, 4567 publications were analyzed in this present literature review in order to recognize the different aspects of implementing technology-enhanced learning approaches. Finally, 20 categories are defined in four main areas that summarize all the aspects in the field of technology-enhanced learning. Moreover, the study also reveals research areas that are important but hardly investigated in the observed journals of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Schweighofer & Martin Ebner, 2015. "Aspects to Be Considered when Implementing Technology-Enhanced Learning Approaches: A Literature Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:26-49:d:45465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/7/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/7/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bullinger, Hans-Jorg & Fahnrich, Klaus-Peter & Meiren, Thomas, 2003. "Service engineering--methodical development of new service products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 275-287, September.
    2. Patrick Schweighofer & Stefan Grünwald & Martin Ebner, 2015. "Technology Enhanced Learning and the Digital Economy: A Literature Review," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 6(1), pages 50-62, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Ching-Chow & Chen, Shun-Hsing & Shiau, Jiun-Yan, 2007. "A DFX and concurrent engineering model for the establishment of a new department in a university," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 179-189, May.
    2. Oscar F. Bustinza & Ferrán Vendrell-Herrero & Francisco J. Sánchez-Montesinos & José Antonio Campos-Granados, 2021. "Should Manufacturers Support the Entire Product Lifecycle with Services?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Hoffmann, Antje & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2005. "Service provider - customer interactions: Key to success of innovative services," Working Papers 30, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    4. Giacomo DI FOGGIA & Valentina LAZZAROTTI, 2013. "Business Implications Of Local Development Policies: The Case Of Dubai And The Travel Industry," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 78-91, February.
    5. Winger Sei-Wo Tseng & Yung-Chuan Ma & Wing-Kwong Wong & Yi-Te Yeh & Wei-I Wang & Shih-Hung Cheng, 2020. "An Indoor Gardening Planting Table Game Design to Improve the Cognitive Performance of the Elderly with Mild and Moderate Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Opresnik, David & Taisch, Marco, 2015. "The value of Big Data in servitization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 174-184.
    7. Lars Hornuf & Milan F. Klus & Todor S. Lohwasser & Armin Schwienbacher, 2021. "How do banks interact with fintech startups?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1505-1526, October.
    8. Harry Bouwman & Jukka Heikkilä & Marikka Heikkilä & Carlo Leopold & Timber Haaker, 2018. "Achieving agility using business model stress testing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 149-162, May.
    9. Ling-Zhong Lin & Tsuen-Ho Hsu, 2008. "The Qualitative and Quantitative Models for Performance Measurement Systems: The Agile Service Development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 445-476, August.
    10. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2012. "An evolutionary framework for service innovation: Insights of complexity theory for service science," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 813-822.
    11. Cruz-Ros, Sonia & Gonzalez-Cruz, Tomas F., 2015. "Service firm capabilities and performance: Contingent analysis of customer contact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1612-1621.
    12. Winger Sei-Wo Tseng & Chih-Wei Hsu, 2019. "A Smart, Caring, Interactive Chair Designed for Improving Emotional Support and Parent-Child Interactions to Promote Sustainable Relationships Between Elderly and Other Family Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    13. Schicker, Günter & Strassl, Johann, 2019. "Produktportfolio-Management im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung," Weidener Diskussionspapiere 69, University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH).
    14. Atsalakis, George S. & Atsalaki, Ioanna G. & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2018. "Forecasting the success of a new tourism service by a neuro-fuzzy technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 716-727.
    15. Rainer Alt, 2019. "Electronic Markets on digital transformation methodologies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 307-313, September.
    16. Kentaro Watanabe & Masaaki Mochimaru, 2017. "Expanding Impacts of Technology-Assisted Service Systems Through Generalization: Case Study of the Japanese Service Engineering Research Project," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 250-262, September.
    17. Tilo Böhmann & Jan Leimeister & Kathrin Möslein, 2014. "Service Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(2), pages 73-79, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:26-49:d:45465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.