IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i2p22-d483409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Middleware-Based Approach for Multi-Scale Mobility Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier Boulet

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique SystemX, 91120 Palaiseau, France
    COSYS-GRETTIA, Université Gustave Eiffel, IFSTTAR, F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France)

  • Mahdi Zargayouna

    (COSYS-GRETTIA, Université Gustave Eiffel, IFSTTAR, F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France)

  • Gérard Scemama

    (COSYS-GRETTIA, Université Gustave Eiffel, IFSTTAR, F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France)

  • Fabien Leurent

    (LVMT, Université Gustave Eiffel, IFSTTAR, Ecole des Ponts, F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France)

Abstract

Modeling and simulation play an important role in transportation networks analysis. In the literature, authors have proposed many traffic and mobility simulations, with different features and corresponding to different contexts and objectives. They notably consider different scales of simulations. The scales refer to the represented entities, as well as to the space and the time representation of the transportation environment. However, we often need to represent different scales in the same simulation, for instance to represent a neighborhood interacting with a wider region. In this paper, we advocate for the reuse of existing simulations to build a new multi-scale simulation. To do so, we propose a middleware model to couple independent mobility simulations, working at different scales. We consider all the necessary processing and workflow to allow for a coherent orchestration of these simulations. We also propose a prototype implementation of the middleware. The results show that such a middleware is capable of creating a new multi-scale mobility simulation from existing ones, while minimizing the incoherence between them. They also suggest that, to have a maximal benefit from the middleware, existing mobility simulation platforms should allow for an external control of the simulations, allowing for executing a time step several times if necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier Boulet & Mahdi Zargayouna & Gérard Scemama & Fabien Leurent, 2021. "A Middleware-Based Approach for Multi-Scale Mobility Simulation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:22-:d:483409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/2/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/2/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco A. Ortega & Miguel A. Pozo & Justo Puerto, 2018. "On-Line Timetable Rescheduling in a Transit Line," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1106-1121, October.
    2. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    3. Martin Fellendorf & Peter Vortisch, 2010. "Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Jaume Barceló (ed.), Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, chapter 0, pages 63-93, Springer.
    4. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Roorda, Matthew J., 2017. "Impact of hourly parking pricing on travel demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 28-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chai, Huajun & Rodier, Caroline J. & Song, Jeffery W. & Zhang, Michael H. & Jaller, Miguel, 2023. "The impacts of automated vehicles on Center city parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Blanco, Víctor & Conde, Eduardo & Hinojosa, Yolanda & Puerto, Justo, 2020. "An optimization model for line planning and timetabling in automated urban metro subway networks. A case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Raadsen, Mark P.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Bell, Michael G.H., 2020. "Aggregation, disaggregation and decomposition methods in traffic assignment: historical perspectives and new trends," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 199-223.
    4. Eva König, 2020. "A review on railway delay management," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 335-361, June.
    5. Parmar, Janak & Saiyed, Gulnazbanu & Dave, Sanjaykumar, 2023. "Analysis of taste heterogeneity in commuters’ travel decisions using joint parking– and mode–choice model: A case from urban India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Yin, Jiateng & Pu, Fan & Yang, Lixing & D’Ariano, Andrea & Wang, Zhouhong, 2023. "Integrated optimization of rolling stock allocation and train timetables for urban rail transit networks: A benders decomposition approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Zipeng Zhang & Ning Zhang, 2021. "Early Bird Scheme for Parking Management: How Does Parking Play a Role in the Morning Commute Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Odolinski, Kristofer & Pyddoke, Roger, 2019. "Price elasticities of demand for (garage) parking in Stockholm," Working papers in Transport Economics 2019:2, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    9. Woojung Kim & Xiaokun (Cara) Wang, 2022. "Double parking in New York city: a comparison between commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1315-1337, October.
    10. Piotr Gołębiowski & Jolanta Żak & Ilona Jacyna-Gołda, 2020. "Approach to the Proecological Distribution of the Traffic Flow on the Transport Network from the Point of View of Carbon Dioxide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Eliasson, Jonas & Börjesson, Maria, 2022. "Costs and benefits of parking charges in residential areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 95-109.
    12. Shorshani, M. Fallah & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2016. "Microscopic Modeling for Atmospheric Urban Pollutant Dispersion in Dense Urban Road Networks," 57th Transportation Research Forum (51st CTRF) Joint Conference, Toronto, Ontario, May 1-4, 2016 319256, Transportation Research Forum.
    13. Elisabeth Bloder & Georg Jäger, 2021. "Is the Green Wave Really Green? The Risks of Rebound Effects When Implementing “Green” Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    14. Umair Hasan & Andrew Whyte & Hamad AlJassmi, 2022. "A Microsimulation Modelling Approach to Quantify Environmental Footprint of Autonomous Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-31, November.
    15. Lunacek, Monte & Williams, Lindy & Severino, Joseph & Ficenec, Karen & Ugirumurera, Juliette & Eash, Matthew & Ge, Yanbo & Phillips, Caleb, 2021. "A data-driven operational model for traffic at the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Dave, Sanjaykumar M. & Joshi, Gaurang J. & Ravinder, Kayitha & Gore, Ninad, 2019. "Data monitoring for the assessment of on-street parking demand in CBD areas of developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-171.
    17. Asplund, Disa & Pyddoke, Roger, 2021. "Optimal pricing of car use in a small city: A case study of Uppsala," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 88-103.
    18. Enrica Carbone & Vinayak V. Dixit & E. Elisabet Rutstrom, 2022. "Should I stay or should I go? Congestion pricing and equilibrium selection in a transportation network," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 535-562, October.
    19. Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Chung, Cheng-Kung, 2024. "Dissecting the visiting willingness of driving visitors facing a retail market's dual-pricing policy for parking," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Sung-Pil Hong & Kyung Min Kim & Suk-Joon Ko, 2021. "Estimating heterogeneous agent preferences by inverse optimization in a randomized nonatomic game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 207-228, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:22-:d:483409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.