IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p724-d1583717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Efficiency in Greenhouses and Comparison of Energy Sources Used for Heating

Author

Listed:
  • Sedat Boyacı

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, 40100 Kırşehir, Türkiye)

  • Joanna Kocięcka

    (Department of Land Improvement, Environmental Development and Spatial Management, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-649 Poznań, Poland)

  • Barbara Jagosz

    (Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 31-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Atılgan Atılgan

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, 07425 Alanya, Türkiye)

Abstract

Sustainability in greenhouse farming, one of the areas where the most energy is needed in the agricultural sector, can be achieved by increasing energy efficiency. Due to increasing energy costs in Türkiye and worldwide, increasing energy efficiency in greenhouses is seen as possible using renewable energy sources that do not produce waste instead of fossil energy sources. This study determined the heat-energy demand in the provinces of Türkiye with continental (Kırşehir and Kütahya) and Mediterranean (Antalya and Mersin) climates. For this purpose, the heat-energy requirement was calculated for greenhouse types with three different insulation properties (S-1: roof and side walls polyethylene, S-2: roof polyethylene, side walls polycarbonate, and S-3: roof polyethylene, side walls polycarbonate, and thermal curtain). Then, the amount and cost of fossil (coal, fuel oil, and natural gas) and renewable energy sources (geothermal and biogas) to be used in obtaining this energy, the heating cost for unit tomato yield, and the amount of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) released into the atmosphere were compared. According to the results obtained, the highest heat-energy requirement was 356.5 kWh m −2 year −1 in the S-1 greenhouse in the Kütahya province, and the lowest was 46.3 kWh m −2 year −1 in the S-3 greenhouse in the Mersin province. Depending on energy conservation, 6% of energy savings can be achieved in S-2 and 29% in S-3 compared to S-1. The highest heating cost for producing one kilogram of tomatoes was 0.70 USD kg −1 in fuel oil and Kütahya province (S-1). The lowest was calculated as 0.06 USD kg −1 in geothermally heated greenhouses in Kırşehir and Kütahya provinces (S-3). The highest CO 2 to be released into the atmosphere with fuels was equal to 253.1 kg m −2 year −1 in coal fuel in Kütahya province (S-1). The lowest was calculated as 1.1 kg m −2 year −1 in geothermally heated greenhouses in Kırşehir and Kütahya provinces (S-3). The results of this research can be used to develop feasibility studies for greenhouse companies, greenhouse sector policies, policymakers, environmental protection, and taking precautions against the climate crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Sedat Boyacı & Joanna Kocięcka & Barbara Jagosz & Atılgan Atılgan, 2025. "Energy Efficiency in Greenhouses and Comparison of Energy Sources Used for Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:724-:d:1583717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidari, M.D. & Omid, M., 2011. "Energy use patterns and econometric models of major greenhouse vegetable productions in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 220-225.
    2. Trépanier, Marie-Pier & Gosselin, Louis & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2025. "Best combinations of energy-efficiency measures in greenhouses considering energy consumption, yield, and costs: Comparison between two cold climate cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    3. Hong, Jingke & Shen, Qiping & Xue, Fan, 2016. "A multi-regional structural path analysis of the energy supply chain in China's construction industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 56-68.
    4. Hyung-Kweon Kim & Geum-Choon Kang & Jong-Pil Moon & Tae-Seok Lee & Sung-Sik Oh, 2018. "Estimation of Thermal Performance and Heat Loss in Plastic Greenhouses with and without Thermal Curtains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Adnan Rasheed & Jong Won Lee & Hyun Woo Lee, 2018. "Development and Optimization of a Building Energy Simulation Model to Study the Effect of Greenhouse Design Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Xiaodan Zhang & Jian Lv & Jianming Xie & Jihua Yu & Jing Zhang & Chaonan Tang & Jing Li & Zhixue He & Cheng Wang, 2020. "Solar Radiation Allocation and Spatial Distribution in Chinese Solar Greenhouses: Model Development and Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    7. Anna-Maria N. Dimitropoulou & Vasileios Z. Maroulis & Eugenia N. Giannini, 2023. "A Simple and Effective Model for Predicting the Thermal Energy Requirements of Greenhouses in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Sedat Boyacı & Atilgan Atilgan & Joanna Kocięcka & Daniel Liberacki & Roman Rolbiecki & Barbara Jagosz, 2023. "Determination of the Effect of a Thermal Curtain Used in a Greenhouse on the Indoor Climate and Energy Savings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Canakci, Murad & Yasemin Emekli, N. & Bilgin, Sefai & Caglayan, Nuri, 2013. "Heating requirement and its costs in greenhouse structures: A case study for Mediterranean region of Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 483-490.
    10. Chau, J. & Sowlati, T. & Sokhansanj, S. & Preto, F. & Melin, S. & Bi, X., 2009. "Techno-economic analysis of wood biomass boilers for the greenhouse industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 364-371, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Baogang & Fan, Xinying & Liu, Ming & Hao, Wengang, 2016. "Experimental study of the burning-cave hot water soil heating system in solar greenhouse," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P3), pages 1113-1120.
    2. Anna-Maria N. Dimitropoulou & Vasileios Z. Maroulis & Eugenia N. Giannini, 2023. "A Simple and Effective Model for Predicting the Thermal Energy Requirements of Greenhouses in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Adnan Rasheed & Wook Ho Na & Jong Won Lee & Hyeon Tae Kim & Hyun Woo Lee, 2019. "Optimization of Greenhouse Thermal Screens for Maximized Energy Conservation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Mohammed Zia Uddin Kamal & Senaratne Ranamukhaarachchi & Mohammad Saiful Alam & Mohammad Khairul Alam & Mohammad Arifur Rahman Khan & Mohammad Moshiul Islam & Mohammad Ashraf, 2022. "Effects of Organic Amendments on Soil Aggregate Stability, Carbon Sequestration, and Energy Use Efficiency in Wetland Paddy Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Chen, Liming & Zhao, Yuanyuan & Xie, Rui & Su, Bin & Liu, Yue & Renfei, Xv, 2023. "Embodied energy intensity of global high energy consumption industries: A case study of the construction industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Tang, Miaohan & Hong, Jingke & Liu, Guiwen & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping, 2019. "Exploring energy flows embodied in China's economy from the regional and sectoral perspectives via combination of multi-regional input–output analysis and a complex network approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1191-1201.
    7. Pahlavan, Reza & Omid, Mahmoud & Akram, Asadollah, 2011. "Energy use efficiency in greenhouse tomato production in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6714-6719.
    8. Guan, Shihui & Han, Mengyao & Wu, Xiaofang & Guan, ChengHe & Zhang, Bo, 2019. "Exploring energy-water-land nexus in national supply chains: China 2012," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1225-1234.
    9. Delivand, Mitra Kami & Barz, Mirko & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Sajjakulnukit, Boonrod, 2011. "Economic feasibility assessment of rice straw utilization for electricity generating through combustion in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3651-3658.
    10. Toka, Agorasti & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum & Grigoriadou, Anastasia-Loukia, 2014. "Managing the diffusion of biomass in the residential energy sector: An illustrative real-world case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 56-69.
    11. Vlontzos, G. & Pardalos, P.M., 2017. "Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 155-162.
    12. Wang, Zhen & Wei, Liyuan & Niu, Beibei & Liu, Yong & Bin, Guoshu, 2017. "Controlling embedded carbon emissions of sectors along the supply chains: A perspective of the power-of-pull approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1544-1551.
    13. Zhu, Kai & Li, Xueqiang & Campana, Pietro Elia & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinyue, 2018. "Techno-economic feasibility of integrating energy storage systems in refrigerated warehouses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 348-357.
    14. Sun, Xudong & Li, Jiashuo & Qiao, Han & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Energy implications of China's regional development: New insights from multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 118-131.
    15. Barut, Zeliha Bereket & Ertekin, Can & Karaagac, Hasan Ali, 2011. "Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5466-5475.
    16. Plappally, A.K. & Lienhard V, J.H., 2012. "Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4818-4848.
    17. Liu, Lan-Cui & Cheng, Lei & Zhao, Lu-Tao & Cao, Ying & Wang, Ce, 2020. "Investigating the significant variation of coal consumption in China in 2002-2017," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    18. Wei Yang & Junnian Song, 2019. "Depicting Flows of Embodied Water Pollutant Discharge within Production System: Case of an Undeveloped Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Adedayo Johnson Ogungbile & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Ibrahim Yahaya Wuni & Jin Xue & Jingke Hong, 2021. "A Hybrid Framework for Direct CO 2 Emissions Quantification in China’s Construction Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:724-:d:1583717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.