IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i1p203-d1560681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimization of the Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Performance of a Hybrid Solar–Biomass Combined Brayton/Organic Rankine Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

  • Jorge Duarte-Forero

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

  • Daniel Mendoza-Casseres

    (Programa de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

Abstract

This research proposes integrating a combined system from a supercritical Brayton cycle (SBC) at extremely high temperatures and pressures and a conventional ORC cycle. The ORC cycle was evaluated with three working fluids: acetone, toluene, and cyclohexane. Of these, the cyclohexane, thanks to its dry fluid condition, obtained the best result in the sensitivity analysis for the energetic and exergetic evaluations with the most relevant (net power and exergy destruction) for the variation in the most critical performance parameter of the system for both the configuration with reheat and the configuration with recompression. Between the two proposed configurations, the most favorable performance was obtained with a binary system with reheat and recompression; with reheat, the SBC obtained first- and second-law efficiencies of 45.8% and 25.2%, respectively, while the SBC obtained values of 54.8% and 27.9%, respectively, with reheat and recompression. Thus, an increase in overall system efficiency of 30.3% is obtained. In addition, the destroyed exergy is reduced by 23% due to the bypass before the evaporation process. The SBC-ORC combined hybrid system with reheat and recompression has a solar radiation of 950 W/m 2 K, an exhaust heat recovery efficiency of 0.85, and a turbine inlet temperature of 1008.15 K. The high pressure is 25,000 kPa, the isentropic efficiency of the turbines is 0.8, the pressure ratio is 12, and the pinch point of the evaporator is initially 20 °C and reaches values of 45 °C in favorable supercritical conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa & Jorge Duarte-Forero & Daniel Mendoza-Casseres, 2025. "Multi-Objective Optimization of the Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Performance of a Hybrid Solar–Biomass Combined Brayton/Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:203-:d:1560681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/1/203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Mateen Afzal Awan & Aamer Bilal Asghar & Muhammad Yaqoob Javed & Zsolt Conka, 2023. "Ordering Technique for the Maximum Power Point Tracking of an Islanded Solar Photovoltaic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Seema Bhardwaj & Kiran Nair & Muhammad Usman Tariq & Asad Ahmad & Asmita Chitnis, 2023. "The State of Research in Green Marketing: A Bibliometric Review from 2005 to 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    4. Lak Kamari, Mojtaba & Maleki, Akbar & Daneshpour, Raheleh & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Alhuyi Nazari, Mohammad, 2023. "Exergy, energy and environmental evaluation of a biomass-assisted integrated plant for multigeneration fed by various biomass sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    5. Quoilin, Sylvain & Aumann, Richard & Grill, Andreas & Schuster, Andreas & Lemort, Vincent & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Dynamic modeling and optimal control strategy of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2183-2190, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    2. Sedighi, Mohammadreza & Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Alamdari, Pedram & Lake, Maree & Rose, Andrew & Izadgoshasb, Iman & Taylor, Robert A., 2020. "A novel high-temperature (>700 °C), volumetric receiver with a packed bed of transparent and absorbing spheres," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Fu, Qianmei & Ding, Jing & Lao, Jiewei & Wang, Weilong & Lu, Jianfeng, 2019. "Thermal-hydraulic performance of printed circuit heat exchanger with supercritical carbon dioxide airfoil fin passage and molten salt straight passage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 594-604.
    4. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    5. Roberto Pili & Hartmut Spliethoff & Christoph Wieland, 2017. "Dynamic Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle—Detailed Model of a Kettle Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Pili, Roberto & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2019. "Simulation of Organic Rankine Cycle – Quasi-steady state vs dynamic approach for optimal economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 619-640.
    7. Xiao, Gang & Zheng, Guanghua & Ni, Dong & Li, Qiang & Qiu, Min & Ni, Mingjiang, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of solar photon-enhanced thermionic conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 134-145.
    8. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    9. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & Palombo, Adolfo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2015. "Energy and economic analysis of geothermal–solar trigeneration systems: A case study for a hotel building in Ischia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 224-241.
    10. Fatigati, Fabio & Di Bartolomeo, Marco & Cipollone, Roberto, 2024. "Model-based optimisation of solar-assisted ORC-based power unit for domestic micro-cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    11. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    12. Sun, Lei & Liu, Tianyuan & Wang, Ding & Huang, Chengming & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Deep learning method based on graph neural network for performance prediction of supercritical CO2 power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    13. Georgică Gheorghe & Petronela Tudorache & Ioan Mihai Roşca, 2023. "The Contribution of Green Marketing in the Development of a Sustainable Destination through Advanced Clustering Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Pili, Roberto & Wieland, Christoph & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2018. "Analysis and comparison of dynamic behavior of heat exchangers for direct evaporation in ORC waste heat recovery applications from fluctuating sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 724-740.
    15. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    16. Dora Villada-Castillo & Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa & Jorge Duarte-Forero, 2023. "Thermohydraulic and Economic Evaluation of a New Design for Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers in Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    18. Zhu, Sipeng & Ma, Zetai & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "Energy and exergy analysis of the combined cycle power plant recovering waste heat from the marine two-stroke engine under design and off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Lisheng Pan & Huaixin Wang, 2019. "Experimental Investigation on Performance of an Organic Rankine Cycle System Integrated with a Radial Flow Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:203-:d:1560681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.