IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1871-d1375391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Off-Design Characteristics and Control of an Innovative S-CO 2 Power Cycle Driven by the Flue Gas Waste Heat

Author

Listed:
  • Shaohua Hu

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yaran Liang

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Ruochen Ding

    (China Three Gorges Corporation Science and Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Lingli Xing

    (Hunan Province College Key Laboratory of Molecular Design and Green Chemistry, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China)

  • Wen Su

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Xinxing Lin

    (China Three Gorges Corporation Science and Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Naijun Zhou

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Recently, supercritical CO 2 (S-CO 2 ) has been extensively applied for the recovery of waste heat from flue gas. Although various cycle configurations have been proposed, existing studies predominantly focus on the steady analysis and optimization of different S-CO 2 structures under design conditions, and there is a noticeable deficiency in off-design research, especially for the innovative S-CO 2 cycles. Thus, in this work aimed at the proposed novel S-CO 2 power cycle, off-design characteristics and corresponding control strategies are investigated for the waste heat recovery. Based on the design parameters of the S-CO 2 cycle, structural dimensions of printed circuit heat exchangers (PCHEs) and shell-and-tube heat exchangers are determined, and design values of turbines and compressors are specified. On this basis, off-design models for these key components are formulated. By manipulating variables such as cooling water inlet temperature, cooling water mass flow rate, flue gas inlet temperature and flue gas mass flow rate, cycle performances of the system are analyzed under off-design conditions. The simulation results show that when the inlet temperature and the mass flow rate of cooling water vary separately, the thermal efficiency both can reach the maximum value of 28.43% at the design point. For the changes in heat source parameters, the optimum point is slightly deviated from the design condition. Amidst the fluctuations in flue gas inlet temperature, the thermal efficiency optimizes to a peak of 28.56% at 530 °C. In the case of variation in the flue gas mass flow rate, the highest thermal efficiency 28.75% can be obtained. Furthermore, to maintain the efficient and stable operation of the S-CO 2 power cycle, the corresponding control strategy of the cooling water mass flow rate is proposed for the cooling water inlet temperature variation. Generally, when the inlet temperature of cooling water increases from 23 °C to 27 °C, the cooling water mass flow should increase from 82.3% to 132.7% of the design value to keep the system running as much as possible at design conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaohua Hu & Yaran Liang & Ruochen Ding & Lingli Xing & Wen Su & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2024. "Research on Off-Design Characteristics and Control of an Innovative S-CO 2 Power Cycle Driven by the Flue Gas Waste Heat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1871-:d:1375391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1871/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1871/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Ruiyuan & Su, Wen & Lin, Xinxing & Zhou, Naijun & Zhao, Li, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis and parametric optimization of a novel S–CO2 power cycle for the waste heat recovery of internal combustion engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Gaylord Carrillo Caballero & Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia & Osvaldo José Venturini & Electo Eduardo Silva Lora & Anibal Alviz Meza & Luis Sebastián Mendoza Castellanos, 2023. "Unidimensional and 3D Analyses of a Radial Inflow Turbine for an Organic Rankine Cycle under Design and Off-Design Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Larjola, J., 1995. "Electricity from industrial waste heat using high-speed organic Rankine cycle (ORC)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 227-235, October.
    4. Enhua Wang & Ningjian Peng, 2023. "A Review on the Preliminary Design of Axial and Radial Turbines for Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Liang, Yaran & Lin, Xinxing & Su, Wen & Xing, Lingli & Zhou, Naijun, 2023. "Thermal-economic analysis of a novel solar power tower system with CO2-based mixtures at typical days of four seasons," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    2. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 199-211.
    3. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    4. Roy, J.P. & Misra, Ashok, 2012. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle using R-123 for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 227-235.
    5. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    6. Li, Ligeng & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Zhang, Yonghao & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Reducing the operational fluctuation via splitting CO2 transcritical power cycle in engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    7. Xia, Jiaxi & Wang, Jiangfeng & Lou, Juwei & Hu, Jianjun & Yao, Sen, 2023. "Thermodynamic, economic, environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling and power system for cascade utilization of engine waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    8. De Pascale, Andrea & Ferrari, Claudio & Melino, Francesco & Morini, Mirko & Pinelli, Michele, 2012. "Integration between a thermophotovoltaic generator and an Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 695-703.
    9. Saidur, R. & Rezaei, M. & Muzammil, W.K. & Hassan, M.H. & Paria, S. & Hasanuzzaman, M., 2012. "Technologies to recover exhaust heat from internal combustion engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5649-5659.
    10. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    11. Wang, Zhe & Jiang, Yuemao & Ma, Yue & Han, Fenghui & Ji, Yulong & Cai, Wenjian, 2022. "A partial heating supercritical CO2 nested transcritical CO2 cascade power cycle for marine engine waste heat recovery: Thermodynamic, economic, and footprint analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    12. Palma-Flores, Oscar & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Canseco-Melchorb, Graciela, 2016. "Simultaneous molecular and process design for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 32-47.
    13. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    14. Liu, Wei & Meinel, Dominik & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2014. "Investigation of hydrofluoroolefins as potential working fluids in organic Rankine cycle for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 106-116.
    15. Hyung-Seok Park & Hong-Jun Heo & Bum-Seog Choi & Kyung Chun Kim & Jang-Mok Kim, 2019. "Speed Control for Turbine-Generator of ORC Power Generation System and Experimental Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Chen, Huijuan & Yogi Goswami, D. & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of CO2- and R32-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2802-2808, August.
    17. Bin Mamat, A.M.I. & Martinez-Botas, R.F. & Rajoo, S. & Romagnoli, A. & Petrovic, S., 2015. "Waste heat recovery using a novel high performance low pressure turbine for electric turbocompounding in downsized gasoline engines: Experimental and computational analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 218-234.
    18. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Mao, Yi & Zhang, Lei & Wan, Li & Stanford, Russell J., 2022. "Proposal and assessment of a novel power and freshwater production system for the heat recovery of diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Guo, Xinru & Zhang, Houcheng & Hu, Ziyang & Hou, Shujin & Ni, Meng & Liao, Tianjun, 2021. "Energetic, exergetic and ecological evaluations of a hybrid system based on a phosphoric acid fuel cell and an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1871-:d:1375391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.